Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'negative reviews'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • General Discussion
    • New to this? Things you should know...
    • General Discussion Area - all of Canada
    • Interviews With the Community
    • Member of the Month & Competitions
    • Fun Threads
    • Jokes
    • In the news
    • Tech corner
    • Legal discussion, cases & questions
    • Health & Wellness
    • COVID-19 Discussion
    • Surveys, industry research & organization announcements
  • Online Services
    • Online Advertising Schedules and Announcements
    • Online Services Recommendations
  • Ontario
    • Barrie, Muskoka & North Bay Ontario
    • Durham / York / Peel Regions Ontario
    • Belleville Ontario
    • Hamilton Ontario
    • Kingston Ontario
    • Kitchener Ontario
    • London Ontario
    • Niagara Falls Ontario
    • Ottawa Ontario
    • Peterborough And The Kawarthas in Ontario
    • Sudbury & Sault St. Marie Ontario
    • Thunder Bay Ontario
    • Timmins Ontario
    • Toronto Ontario
    • Windsor Ontario
    • Cornwall Ontario
  • British Columbia
  • Quebec
  • Alberta
  • Nova Scotia
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Manitoba
  • New Brunswick
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Northwest Territories, Nunavut & Yukon
  • Saskatchewan
  • Community (Moderators/Council)
  • International
  • Poly Party (group sex)'s Poly Party (group sex) Topics
  • Redhead Appreciation Group (RHAG)'s Redhead Appreciation Group (RHAG) Topics
  • Paying homage to the all mighty spinner's Paying homage to the all mighty spinner Topics
  • Dancers and Devotees's Dancers and Devotees Topics
  • Itty Bitty Titty Committee!'s Itty Bitty Titty Committee! Topics
  • The Feet Worshippers Group's The Feet Worshippers Group Topics
  • Alt women and those who love them's Alt women and those who love them Topics
  • Boobies --- :) real, man-made... WE LOVE THEM ALL...'s Boobies --- :) real, man-made... WE LOVE THEM ALL... Topics
  • Leg Worship's Leg Worship Topics
  • Lover of bdsm's Lover of bdsm Topics
  • Big Boob Lovers's Big Boob Lovers Topics
  • Girls who wear glasses's Girls who wear glasses Topics
  • Yoga Pants!'s Yoga Pants! Topics
  • Cleavages's Cleavages Topics
  • Big booty girls & the men who love them's Big booty girls & the men who love them Topics
  • THREESOMES!'s THREESOMES! Topics
  • I Love Ebony Girls's I Love Ebony Girls Topics
  • Uniform & Roleplay Lovers's Uniform & Roleplay Lovers Topics
  • Motorcycle Enthusiasts Social Group's Motorcycle Enthusiasts Social Group Topics
  • Coffee and Women's Coffee and Women Topics
  • Boot Lovers's Boot Lovers Topics
  • Busty and Petite's Busty and Petite Topics
  • The No Bra and No Panty Club's The No Bra and No Panty Club Topics

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Profile Welcome Message


Gender


Location


Biography


Recommendation or URL that is important to me on lyla.ch


Twitter Address


My Website:

Found 1 result

  1. Thank you, Samantha, for bringing up this topic. It's a topic which deserves review and thoughtful discussion. You mentioned a screening benefit to SPs for those clients who request an appointment and have a verified membership. What would the benefit be, exactly? Would it potentially deter verified members from providing SPs with information they require for their own independent screening? For example, if verified members provide CERB with their real name and other verifiable personal information, perhaps they will be reluctant to provide it to an SP who may/may not be less reliable? There are other websites that work like this. Perhaps some escorts who also use those websites can provide insight on this question (i.e p411). I worry because some SPs might feel pressured to see a client simply because he's paid for a verified membership and then they will have little recourse if something bad happens. Given the above situation, you suggest the information might be disclosed if the client is proven to be dangerous. I wonder what it means, exactly, to be proven as dangerous. Would the CERB council decide this? I ask because sexual assault is such a contentious issue (i.e. what is and isn't assault, who is to 'blame', what he said versus what she said, etc.). It would be awful, absolutely awful, to be doubted in these types of circumstances. It would be equally awful to have to 'prove' to CERB that I was assaulted, or felt violated, or robbed, in order to get the necessary information I need to protect myself. A few thoughts to get the conversation going.
×
×
  • Create New...