How do you feel about 45 minute option?

[Andee 220524]

Because I am a same day, short notice booker, my most popular time spot request is 30 minutes, followed by 45 minutes and then hour requests.

 

The 45 minute option usually my most popular request when I am travelling.

[Nicolette Vaughn 294340]

I've had very good results since implementing 45 min appointments a while back. Sometimes a half hour is not enough but an hour is too much time. Especially in the middle of a work day.

Posted via Mobile Device

[Ice4fun 78396]

45 minutes is not really an option i would choose as I tend to like longer engagements. On first appointments i tend to book for an hour and usually 2 hours for any followup meetings.

 

Just my opinion

[Gentleman11 10508]

45 minutes is great for me.................as long as I can book the preceding or next 75 minutes.............

[Tempted Monk 5057]

I vote for 45 min.

1. For the first rendezvous, it is long enough to understand if there is a connection and if you want to come again. If there is a personal "click" you can feel it very quickly. And if this "click" does not happen it cannot be developed during the extra time.

2. Convenient session during the busy day when there is just no more time literally.

[Guest M****ella's C****s (retire]

I offer a variety of times, something for everyone. Some people like something quick and easy, others prefer something medium length; then there are those erotic connoisseurs, who enjoys a leisurely, drawn out, longer session. Imho I think they are all great in their own ways.

 

I will admit that I enjoy sessions which are longer in length. It's great to take your time and indulge. Warm hugs and kisses, a drink or two, maybe cook a meal. Enjoy all the nooks and crannies of each other's bodies. Massages, cuddles, showers for 2 and all the other fun things one can get up to. I like not feeling rushed, just enjoying the company of the gentleman I am entertaining. Makes things more relaxed; helps to allow the natural ambiance and the flow of a session feel organic and genuine.

 

With that being said, there are some fun things about shorter sessions as well, the thrill of ripping your clothes off as quickly as possible to get to the fun. Or after a warm hug and kiss to say hello, dropping to your knees to lavish a special member with some warm, wet, oral attention. Always a fun way to be greeted. Or a quick sprint to where the magic happens to start your play time...Sometimes a quick session can be just as intense as a long one. It all depends on the connection you have with the person and how horny you both are.

 

I feel like medium sessions offer the a little of both, a little be quick and hot with out feeling rushed. So I can completely understand why some gentlemen would enjoy a 45 minute session. Best of both worlds :)

 

I have yet to have someone request a 75 minute session, I don't think I would be opposed to it, but like most things, being open and communicating is always best. However, now my mind is wandering and thinking of all the salacious things I could get up in 75 minutes... :icon_redface:

 

Wow, I didn't realize I rambled for so long, my apologizes!

[jafo105 39057]

For me 45 minutes is way to short. Sometimes I even find two hours to be too short. The lady and I get to chatting and making a connection that we forget about the time. Before we know it - it is time for her to go. And we have not had any playtime.

[FunValerie 8573]

I have been offering 45 minute sessions for a long time. In practical terms, they have never been popular. Lovers on budgets like 30 minutes sessions. Lovers who like to relax and indulge like one hour sessions or longer.

 

A few people have asked for 75 minute sessions and I have been pleased to quote a rate on those sessions when asked. 75 minutes has not been a popular time frame.

[GingerSnap69 194]

I offer the 45 mins and think it works out well ! Its a great option and you don't feel so rushed ! I am not a clock watcher and sometimes the hh just doesn't cut it unless your wanting just a quick in and out session.

[Guest P*rry]

My preference is sixty minutes. However, I'm retired so every day is a holiday with less need to rush.

[Zachmont 3826]

I guess it's an indication of where I am in life, but 45 minutes seems too short for me. I'd prefer a 90 minute rate personally, to allow for a non-rushed time. I don't want to feel pressured like there's another batter on deck (even if there isn't, that's what a 30-45 min would feel like to me).

[paw00 114]

I think 45 mins are the best if you can .

[someguy 67067]

Wanted to bump this thread up as there was another thread discussing this now.

But I usually do 45 minutes sessions with SP's now, as it is more affordable and I usually do noon appointments. 30 minutes is just too short. but 45 seems about right for a Escort. But need an hour for a massage :)

[clearlycanadian7583 1199]

Never had a 45 min but personally I have always found 30 and 60 to short, I generally go for 90 or 2 hours, I wanna really enjoy my time.

Posted via Mobile Device

[Guest *ik****g]

45 minutes is like a particular part of my anatomy, too short. LOL

[someguy 67067]

I'm finding more women offering the 45 minute session now. And if they don't you can just asked. I find 45 minute just right for me, especially since I usually do noon. Gives me time to get there, have some fun and get back to work without being too late. 30 minutes is too short, but the extra 15 minutes gives you time to chat and kiss and cuddle if you finish early. And it fits better in my budget these days.

[johnybird 4391]

it usually takes me 30-40 minutes to get ready

on the average 20-30 minutes to get there

and another 20-30 minutes to get back....

 

45 minutes would pass in a blink of an eye! I enjoy taking my time...

 

don't get me wrong I do enjoy quickies also, but that can happen in a 2-3 hours date as well :)

[Meg O'Ryan 266444]

While I do offer 30min can't say I really enjoy it. Like more time! 45min is better :)

[Guest]

I do 45 minute appointments. It's OK - if someone is in a hurry or wants just a smidgen more than half and hour and a little bit less than an hour I'm fine with that. I can definitely make a connection with someone in that amount of time.

[someguy 67067]

These day's I am doing mostly 45 minute appointments for SP's and an a 1 Hr for MA's.

This fits my budget, and time. 30 minutes is not enough, but 45 is just about right and is more affordable.

[someguy 67067]

Just wanted to get any new opinions. I don't see why more women are not trying to offer 45 minutes if they offer a 30 minute session? 30 minutes doesn't seem like much time to me, Especially if you take a shower before and after?

[Guest st*****ens**ors]

I could see 45 minutes with someone I knew and shared a connection with, but otherwise I would rather at least an hour, and longer when I can manage it. Getting to know someone is a very large part of the attraction for me, and how do you do that in less than an hour?

 

There are providers who prefer shorter encounters precisely because they themselves are less interested in an emotional connection, or even conversation, and that's entirely fair, but I try to seek out those who are so inclined.

[GoinDown 3669]

If I share a connection with someone I'll want to spend more time not less.

[Guest st*****ens**ors]

If I share a connection with someone I'll want to spend more time not less.

 

Oh I would too! However, in a situation where you had seen someone several times, established a rapport and planned to continue, I could see stopping in for a quick hello. Then it's just part of a longer story.

[GoinDown 3669]

and its easy to blow ones ... budget !