Jump to content

becker

General Member
  • Content Count

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by becker


  1. I met Freya a few days ago and was blown away. She is gorgeous esp. her eyes, toned, completely inviting and friendly. She is well-spoken and generous in the bedroom. Her DFK was passionate, and she was vocal and appreciative of being pleased. While she offers a CBJ, it was superb and was as good as any BBBJ I have had. She went deep with varying technique and lots of eye contact. Her nipples are responsive. One of my best "not sure what to expect" dates ever.


  2. Hi All:

     

    I was wondering who you would nominate (always some YMMV I suppose) for a provider of outstanding passionate kissing with lots of tongue play. I will say right now my nomination goes to JessyCeleste, but I would love to hear yours as it's is something I am always seeking.

    • Like 2

  3. I'm not really understanding the point of posting an ad with fake pics and info, having a guy text a bunch of questions, show up to a different girl, and walk away.....what benefit to those posting the ads? Do guys just go ahead and pay and play anyway cause they made the drive? Just not getting it.


  4. Hopefully this is not too taboo, but my present fantasy is to get a tube of the best lube money can buy, a bottle of red Masi, and call on a kinky, adventurous SP who would work her clit while I cautiously and slowly attempt to go from several fingers to fisting, all the while taking cues and direction from my partner. Of course if successful, I would love for my partner to experience an "off the charts" climax, which is very common so I understand.

    • Like 1

  5. Hey Guys - I am wondering if SPs with either a permanent incall, or, a rented one (hotel room for a few days) would ever consider "subletting" it for 1 or 2 hrs to a hobbiest with a need for an incall from time to time? Perhaps this already occurs? If not, does it make sense to get paid for your space if it is sitting empty? Perhaps you could even stay and watch. If you have a permanent incall and would be open to making arrangements to sublet it occasionally, please PM me.

     

    Thanks.


  6. Very interesting replies and perspectives. Perhaps "Contract" was too strong a word, and I should have used "Agreement" or "Understanding". For the record, I always gladly pay upon arrival and thank the provider for seeing me upon arrival. I always have a shower to assure the provider I will be fresh and clean. I always say thank you at the end, and sometimes text "thanks again......" later. I feel/hope I am a pretty good client. Also, in my experience, the chances of getting "baited and switched" so to speak are much, much greater outside of CERB. When this has happened, I never expressed my disappointment verbally or later by text....bygones were bygones....but it did incline me to start this thread.

     

    Regardless, and I am not hoping to drag this thread on for 2 more weeks, perhaps I can clarify my question as such, and it's a basically a YES or NO question, and it's an industry question, not an Ottawa CERB question.

     

    If a provider outright "baits and switches/deceives/misleads") a hobbyist who based on these mistruths books an appointment and pays in full upfront, in your opinion, should the hobbyist have any recourse other than never seeing her again....YES or NO?


  7. The scenario:

     

    Client texts or PMs the provider, giving a general overview, or, specifics on what he is looking for, and the provider agrees that she is fine with everything, and the client agrees on the price, so the client books.

     

    The client pays upfront and after the 30/60 min. session, it is obvious to the client that indeed the provider decided to not provide some items that were agreed to in the text or PM (i.e. DFK was tight lipped pecking, shared shower turned into "do you mind showering alone so I don't mess up my hair", and "yes I have lots of toys" became "I can't find my vibrator" and so on).

     

    Did the provider break the contract? Does the provider owe the client some kind of rebate? Or is the client SOL because the cash has been stashed giving the provider a sense of "mission accomplished" leaving the client with no recourse.

     

    I am curious how the members of Cerb, both providers and clients, feel not about the specific examples above, but about the concept of "you were paid in full upfront and failed to perform the agreed upon services". If the client arrives and the provider decides "I'm not showering with this person", should she not be honest and declare it upfront before payment, and allow the client to decide if he still wants to spend the same amount of money on a reduced service? Perhaps some providers reading this have do just that???

     

    Should the client have the right to say "I paid for X upfront, and you gave me x minus y, so I would appreciate a $50 dollar rebate (perhaps that also has happened).

     

    Does YMMV prevail and always cover the provider?? If yes, should YMMV have been part of the "booking conversation" i.e. Dave I only do DFK if I am attracted to you.

     

    It seems in most other businesses, if the client pays in full upfront, and the business does not provide the agreed upon services, the client is not left with a position of "oh well, I'm SOL". Everyone on Cerb would object and take some kind of action (do it again, give me some money back, small claims court, better business bureau, etc.) if their painter agreed to 2 coats and bolted after 1 - kind of a MSOG in the contracting world 8).

×
×
  • Create New...