itd131

On this board "naomie79" is her handle. Her pictures are accurate and she is even more beautiful in person. She chooses nice hotels for her incall location. She is friendly, her service is great, and she is lots of fun to spend time with.

Usually I only review on the other board but with Naomie everything is positive so I can write an accurate review here as well. Definitely recommend paying her a visit.

Phaedrus, in my opinion it is quite likely things will be worse if we do end up in a "new legal environment." The old law was about controlling how prostitution took place. The new law seeks to eliminate it. I don't have the time or desire to explain all the many possibilities that come to mind but as a starting point I would look at the details of the technical paper, as well as the tone taken by the department of injustice, here:

http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/other-autre/protect/p1.html

Just to give one quick example, it lists "masturbation of a client in the context of a massage parlour" as an illegal act of prostitution. Do you really want to be found in a place that openly offers or advertises this service?

To be clear, I'm not suggesting panic, I'm simply adapting to what may be ahead. Again, many of the better run businesses and indies are doing the same.

I hope you are correct that nothing will change and I am encouraged by the response of some local and provincial governments to the new law. Having said that, I think the logic in your third paragraph may not stand up to reality. Again, do what you are comfortable with, as will I.

You make the point that we don't know what local LE may or may not choose to do. The key here is we don't know how the law will be interpreted or enforced. The one thing I'm sure of is the approach taken by the Harper CONS is concerning. Personally, I'm preparing for the worst and hoping for the best.

Here:

https://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=201956

Maybe you should go back and read the old law. They were highly illegal under those laws and I haven't heard of anybody that got arrested back then. Actually in a sense they break less laws now. So if you did go back then your post doesn't make much sense. Since the law makes it illegal to see anyone offering sexual services for money, Indy or not!

Yes, it's true that under the old law in calls were illegal but the big difference being that due to the SC declaring the old law unconstitutional it was a pretty safe bet that it wasn't being enforced.

There's a reason why quite a few of the better run TO based agencies (Cupid's, Mirage, for example) are changing their websites and business model to a different structure - they are trying to avoid "living off the avails" issues. Any mp that offers massage with pictures of semi-nude women, to me anyway, is asking for trouble.

My interpretation of the new law is that massage parlours are not safe places for clients. I'm no expert and could be wrong but I won't be going to a mp anytime soon.

If you are looking for an mp session, Angels or Paradise, I forget which one, was advertising a birthday special about a week ago. As it was close to my birthday I called and was told it was a free door fee (you still pay the in-room tip). I haven't seen it mentioned since so maybe they changed their minds but it might be worth a call to find out.

Can't remember an ass on an sp that I didn't like - sorry, I guess that doesn't narrow the search much.

Interesting cause I assumed no ad that day would mean not available that day. Then again I only recently found out that it pay to advertise. Should of known since nothing is free anymore!

Always assumed the same as well. In fact, I thought ladies might find it a bit rude to be contacted when they weren't advertising as this might be bothering them when they wanted a day off. Up until now, I have never contacted someone who's ad I didn't see that day. Maybe I should re-think that a bit.