spud271 47779 Report post Posted June 26, 2019 Just saw this morning that Sweet Sammi, formerly of CMJ has now gone independent. Very happy for her! She is a wonderful person to be around and an amazing MA. Can't wait to check her out at the new place! https://www.meetsweetsammi.com/ @MeetSweetSammi 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Royale 504 Report post Posted July 1, 2019 Gorgeous. Too bad about her screening policy, I'm not giving my real name to a mp. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joe Blower 868 Report post Posted July 2, 2019 16 hours ago, Royale said: Gorgeous. Too bad about her screening policy, I'm not giving my real name to a mp. hell ya. and $220 for an hour! thats $40 more than a regular spa with allegedly the same service "within MA limits" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seejayen1 1004 Report post Posted July 5, 2019 Two instances that clearly demonstrate that her screening policy is working!!!! 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Royale 504 Report post Posted July 19, 2019 On 7/5/2019 at 1:14 PM, Seejayen1 said: Two instances that clearly demonstrate that her screening policy is working!!!! Ya. It worked so well I spent my $ on another MP who didnt need my ID. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
castle 38816 Report post Posted July 26, 2019 On 7/18/2019 at 11:36 PM, Royale said: Ya. It worked so well I spent my $ on another MP who didnt need my ID. To be fair, the FAQ section of her website lists three screening options, only two of which require you to divulge your name and/or ID. It indicates that her preferred method of screening is actually a "Recent reference from a past provider: her name and preferred contact method". Which, presumably, would not require you to divulge your ID. Unless, of course, you have some reason to think that someone wouldn't be willing to give her a reference on your behalf....in which case, yeah, her screening is working. Don't get me wrong, I'm not implying that you're a bad client, maybe you can't provide a recent reference because it's been well over a year since you've indulged yourself with a SP/MA (which would be my case), or maybe some other totally innocent reason,...but it's easy to see how a more challenging screening process in lieu of a simple reference would weed out a lot of the bad element. 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spud271 47779 Report post Posted July 31, 2019 On 7/5/2019 at 1:14 PM, Seejayen1 said: Two instances that clearly demonstrate that her screening policy is working!!!! Yes, and she is pretty much fully booked all the time. So clearly her policies are not deterring anyone. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
