Jump to content

London 2012: Will the Olympics bring more prostitutes?

Recommended Posts

London 2012: Will the Olympics bring more prostitutes?

 

Major sporting events such as World Cups and Olympic Games are often preceded by warnings about a rise in prostitution and sex trafficking as a result of the impending influx of spectators. But will prostitution in London really increase because of the 2012 Olympics?

 

It seems like every time a World Cup or an Olympics appears on the horizon, so do warnings from the international press, government ministers and police.

 

They all express fears that thousands of women will be trafficked to the host nation to satisfy the sexual desires of the crowds.

 

The same messages have long been issued for the London 2012 Olympic Games.

 

In January 2010 Tessa Jowell, then Minister for the Olympics in the previous government, told MPs: "Major sporting events can be a magnet for the global sex and trafficking industry; this is wholly unacceptable. I am determined that traffickers will not exploit London 2012."

 

And Dennis Hof, who owns the Moonlite Bunny Ranch, a large-scale brothel in Nevada, US, says he expects London to see "1,000 girls to be trafficked in by South East Asian, Albanian and African gangs, violent gangs involved in crime and drugs".

 

Hof, who wants to run a legal brothel during the Olympics, bases his prediction on what he said he saw at the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver, Canada.

 

But are such warnings accurate?

 

The 2004 Olympic Games in Athens seems to be the first major international sporting event to have invoked widespread warnings about a rise in prostitutes and sex workers. It is often reported to have seen its sex trafficking almost doubling.

 

However, a report by the Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women (GAATW) shows the number of cases in Athens during the whole of 2004 was 181, up from 93 in 2003 - a far cry from the many thousands of women said to be threatened by trafficking in these situations.

 

None of these 181 cases were linked to the Games by Greek authorities.

 

Prior to the 2006 World Cup in Germany, similar warnings were issued by media and various officials, but according to an EU report from January 2007, the German government only found five cases of trafficking cases linked to the tournament.

 

The report also states that "the increase in forced prostitution and human trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation during the 2006 World Cup in Germany which was feared by some did not materialise" with "no sign whatsoever of the alleged 40,000 prostitutes/forced prostitutes - a figure repeatedly reported, also in international media".

 

Where are you going to put them? Are you going to buy a property in east London for six weeks in order to operate this business? How are to contain all those women you have coerced into sex work especially for the Olympics?

 

There is simply no evidence that this sort of thing takes place.

 

The public authorities and police haven't quite grasped how trafficking takes place. They're attacking the wrong targets for finding those trafficking victims.

 

By being so obsessed with sex trafficking, which sells newspapers, we've ignored that cheap labour trafficking is probably a bigger problem.

 

And yet, the 2006 World Cup has been used as an example of an instance where huge numbers of prostitutes were paid for sex by large numbers of the tournament attendees.

 

Sticking with World Cups, a study funded by the United Nations Population Fund and conducted after the 2010 tournament in South Africa found there was no significant change in the numbers of men visiting prostitutes during that event.

 

But there had been broad speculation that between 40,000 and 100,000 sex workers from all over the world would enter South Africa because of that tournament.

 

The 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, held in Vancouver, Canada were also subject to similar speculation - but according to a study conducted afterwards by University of British Columbia researchers, mass trafficking didn't happen there, either.

 

The study says that "despite sensationalised media coverage" prior to the Games, there was "no evidence in this study to support concerns of an influx of sex workers or reports of trafficking of women or girls".

 

Many have used the experiences of the Greeks, Germans and South Africans to form an argument that London will have to brace itself for increased numbers of sex workers.

 

 

But more than two years later, Tessa Jowell, who once told the Commons about her determination to combat sex trafficking at London 2012, now admits that "current intelligence would suggest that we are unlikely to see large scale trafficking into London as a result of the Games".

 

"There is some anecdotal evidence to suggest that international sporting events might create demand for paid sex due to the influx of tourists, site workers, contractors, the media and indeed the athletes themselves - although this is contested."

 

Jowell also says that it is "hard to know" whether the lack of evidence for Games-related trafficking "was a result of the measures that were put in place" by her officials "or whether the threat simply hasn't materialised".

 

"We would certainly rather be having a conversation about whether the threat of trafficking was ever going to materialise rather than about it as a reality on the streets of London and we should continue to be vigilant in the face of such a threat."

 

The Metropolitan Police Service's Human Exploitation and Organised Crime Command (SCD9) was set up at the start of 2010 to tackle vice, human trafficking and immigration crime. It has a team focusing on vice-related crime in the five Olympic host boroughs - Newham, Hackney, Waltham Forest, Tower Hamlets and Greenwich.

 

 

SCD9 was given £600,000 to tackle the potential increase in trafficking in those five boroughs in the run up to 2012.

 

However, a Met Police Authority report on SCD9 published in October 2011 said the "intelligence currently held does not support any increase in prostitution in the Olympic Boroughs and actually shows a decrease in some locations".

 

And a Met Police spokesman says SCD9 was set up "based on assessments made over three years ago" which had used "the best information available" at that time. "As time has moved on we have not seen any rise in trafficking linked with the Olympics," he adds.

 

Conservative London Assembly Member Andrew Boff has compiled the Silence of Violence report which also says there is "no strong evidence that trafficking for sexual exploitation does in fact increase during sporting events".

 

He also says raids on brothels were increasing as the Olympics approached, with 80 being closed in the Olympic borough of Newham in the last 20 months or so.

 

Sarah Walker, of the English Collective of Prostitutes, echoes this view, saying recent frequent police raids on east London brothels represent a pre-Olympics crackdown - about which the ECP is "outraged".

 

Continue reading the main story

London 2012 - One extraordinary year

 

 

The BBC's home of 2012: Latest Olympic news, sport, culture, torch relay, video and audio

 

However, the Met Police denied conducting any crackdown, saying it has "not increased operations targeting brothels in the five Olympic boroughs" and was "responding to local concerns and feedback from residents and businesses across London about street prostitution".

 

Another group representing sex workers, x:talk, is calling for a moratorium on arrests, the detention and deportation of sex workers until the end of the Olympics.

 

A spokeswoman also says police raids on brothels, particularly in east London, are driving sex workers further away from their support network of co-workers and health services, prompting the call for a pause on arrests.

 

"Ultimately, arresting these women and raiding their places of work just makes them more vulnerable," she says.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The one thing they don't do is explain where exactly all these sex workers are living/staying during this time. Isn't 10,000, 20,000, 40,000 a LOT of individual people? Even at 10 per room, doesnt' that mean, in a time of accomodation crunch, they have somehow managed to find 1,000-4,000 places to stay?

 

Is that even possible?

 

The 100,000 was a big stretch too. I know it's Texas, but that's a lot of people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect these numbers are grossly exaggerated. There may be some people already in the city who move into the business temporarily to take advantage of the demand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest W***ledi*Time

The numbers aren't exaggerated - they're complete fiction. Invented out of thin air.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The numbers aren't exaggerated - they're complete fiction. Invented out of thin air.

 

Yes, that seems more likely!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I really have to add, because I think WiT covered the most important points, is that I thoroughly despise the "sexy" topic of forced prostitution being used to sell papers and generate clicks. The feigned indignation as they howl about trafficked women with invented numbers, well, I just find it trivialises the issue. I understand that this is how the media works with everything, but it adds confusion to a serious problem when officials and the media give in to sensationalism. One case of forced prostitution is too many. Do they really think people won't care if there are "only" a few hundred women trafficked a year? If anything, it gives people a sense that it's something they can fight. Tens of thousands of women - that they can't see and can't seem to help - well that just becomes something you give up on.

 

It would be nice to move past the sounds bites on prostitution so those who need help can get it and those who are not doing harmed or being harmed have to liberty to buy and sell sex services as they will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did Sydney for the 2000 Olympics and saw a difference in #s, but wouldn't go so far as to say many were 'imported', as most seemed to come from other parts of Oz where business dropped off. Maybe some high-end international flavour was added, but the streets were not lined with workers fresh off the boat. I dare say some prostitutes even came to see the Olympics (ie: as spectators) and simply did some work in the evenings, in order to pay for their partying.

 

In the end, I even dare say more criminal 'politicians' and 'businessmen' were 'imported' than prostitutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

great, first thing i thought of was getting a major sporting event in brockville . now i read that there wont be any sp's coming. well at least the price of gas went down so off to ottawa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the usual anti-prostitution stance back home as always. Over exaggerate the facts so they have some ground to stand on over keeping it illegal. I just shake my head in shame!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...