Jenifer Jade 6239 Report post Posted August 22, 2012 I am looking at renting a place to work downtown.. Ideally.. I would work with another escort share days/ evenings/ weekends.. I would ask for references and also give you references as well.. Looking for September or October. You can pm me or text me at 979-3272.. Thanks jen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
etasman2000 15994 Report post Posted August 25, 2012 Not picking on you here, this is perhaps the 3rd such post in the last few months. Sharing a location with another SP would fall under the 'brothel' clause from the Canadian Criminal Code especially if with another FS SP. With erotic massage you might get away with it legally, IANAL. The question is do you want to be the legal test case. Bottom line, these request are illegal and should not be discuss publically on any forum. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thompo69 198 Report post Posted August 25, 2012 Not picking on you here, this is perhaps the 3rd such post in the last few months. Sharing a location with another SP would fall under the 'brothel' clause from the Canadian Criminal Code especially if with another FS SP. With erotic massage you might get away with it legally, IANAL. The question is do you want to be the legal test case. Bottom line, these request are illegal and should not be discuss publically on any forum. The Ontario Court of Appeal would disagree with you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
etasman2000 15994 Report post Posted August 27, 2012 The Ontario Court of Appeal would disagree with you. The bawdy house ruling is to be struck down in 12 months from March 2012, we are still within that time period. Basically I'm advocating caution. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Carrie Moon 68826 Report post Posted August 29, 2012 Bawdy house charges apply to a single gal as well.. if applied it does to anyone offering incalls. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thompo69 198 Report post Posted August 30, 2012 The bawdy house ruling is to be struck down in 12 months from March 2012, we are still within that time period. Basically I'm advocating caution. Caution is fine. I'm just saying that this business model has been used for many years, and even before the Court of Appeal ruling, I am not aware of any bawdy house charges unless other factors were at play (ie. underage girls, etc.). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
