Amber Rose

Thank goodness I haven't had to endure that yet(not that human bowel movements are anything unusual, but it's not too sexy to smell it!), but I have had someone use one of my fresh towels to wipe his butt, and then shoved it deep under my sink so I wouldn't find it until after he left, was certainly a surprise to find! :P Posted via Mobile Device

This topic could be discussed until the end of time, and no one would ever fully come to agree on it. Perhaps it is best to let it go, as many had mentioned before :P All-in-all, I think we can agree that an SP has every right to choose who she sees, and if she is not comfortable seeing a certain race, then it is 100% her right to refuse them. Whether the reasoning behind a lady's decision is racist or not, she's allowed to see whomever she wants, and refuse whomever she wants. Some of the examples in this thread show that there are some reasons that wouldn't be classified as racism, and others would be, but whether racist or not, no one is denying that the SP has the freedom to choose with this job. Either way, perhaps we should all agree to disagree maybe? Posted via Mobile Device

Everyone is different and experiences different things, so if one lady experiences all of the items from the list above from mainly coloured men, then sure, I can see why she'd generalize them and become a bit biased. But in my short time escorting, the most unsavory, rude, unhygenic, and just all-around not pleasant have been white men, so why are they not targeted in ads? Perhaps I'm experiencing a different side of people, but just about all of the men of colour I've met have been nothing but nice, clean, and respectful. If we're going by statistical data, I might argue that white men should be the ones SP's are refusing(which they will never do as white men are pretty much the majority). Posted via Mobile Device

Unless the lady is refusing them for reasons such as not wanting to run into people from the same group, etc. then it is racism. Plain and simple, nothing else around it. It may be a "preference", but it's a racist preference. This article sums it up nicely: http://everydayfeminism.com/2013/11/racial-preferences-are-racist/ Out of curiosity, has anyone seen any SP's advertising "No White Guys"? Probably not. With all that said, I do agree the SP's have every right to pick and choose who they see and should never feel pressured to see someone they aren't comfortable with. (not trying to start a new discussion, I just feel strongly on the subject matter) Posted via Mobile Device

There seems to be a good amount of redheaded SP's in Ottawa, so you'll have your pick! Do you prefer the natural ginger look, or dyed fiery redhead, or everything in between? Posted via Mobile Device

Well, I'll throw my opinion in, and I hope I don't come off as bitter or rude! To touch on the part mentioned how it's so easy for women to have sex, no, I'm sorry, I completely disagree. Yes it is more easy to a certain extent, but why is that? Because there's a higher demand of men looking for sex, so the women have lots to choose from. Now why is that?! Well, to put it bluntly, we have to blame it on the patriarchy. But we'll get to that in a minute.. Men and women are taught at young ages very different things. Men are taught that they should be having sex, it's be all, end all in their lives, and they are praised for having it, lots of it! Women on the other hand(at least for the most part) are taught to save themselves, because if they sleep around, they loose a certain amount of their dignity(this is also a contributing factor as to why women selling sex is seen as so bad). We're taught not to sleep around or we'll be a whore, and who wants that?! So women are basically shamed into having the same carnal desires as men, so they decide to either supress them, or not care and live a fulfilling sexual life. Either way, they don't usually go looking for sex quite as much as men, since there still is that stigma and shame in the back of their mind. Another reason(not sure if I'm right or wrong with these, just spewing my ideas!) is this: for the most part, when men are choosing a provider, they at least usually try and find someone that is nice, caring, affectionate, etc. so it feels genuine to them. Men, in this sense, aren't just looking for a quick lay either, but something real, or that at least feels real. Women would be the same as well. For the most part, we don't run around screwing everything we can, we try to find someone who at least likes us before we sleep with them. This is why I have to disagree that it's so easy for women to have sex if they want it. If they're looking for really bad sex with someone they don't know and who probably doesn't even remember their first name, then yes, it's super easy! If they want to find someone to sleep with who at least slightly likes them, the odds slim down by A LOT. Trust me, I've been in the dating game for a long time, and the only availabilities are men who really could not care less about you, they just want in your pants. Now, back to the original subject.. One other huge contributing factor as to why there is such a lower demand for male escorts is simple: women don't usually make enough money to afford it. Most of the hobbiests in this business usually have a good business, or at least make a very comfortable living. I know the times are a-changin' but for the most part, the men are still the main breadwinner for most families while the women take care of the kids. Women, for the most part, do not make near as much as men, and are not nearly as high up in businesses as men(sorry, call me a feminist!), so they don't usually have hundreds to spare for pleasure. Sorry for my rambling, just my two cents on the matter! :) Posted via Mobile Device

To touch a bit on what Tanya said above.. I do agree that many times it's just a miscommunication, or men who aren't very skilled socially, but a large majority of time it's also just them being rude and insulting on purpose. When I'm having a conversation with someone who's inquiring to meet me, and I just don't feel like there will be much chemistry or something about them seems off, I politely tell them I don't think we'll connect well and would prefer not to go through with a meeting, but wish them the best all the same. When they reply with a "well you're a stupid b*tch I wouldn't even touch if you paid me." or the always lovely "well f*ck you then." that's not social awkwardness, that's just them being an asshole on purpose. And even in different situations, the similar reaction of them being rude, disrespectful, or downright insulting is not something I should have to take lightly. I'm usually quite easy-going, even if they're a bit cold with their texting, until they actually give me a reason to take offense. On another note! Another MAJOR turn off, was back when I worked for an agency, I had left an outcall at a hotel earlier than expected, and the driver was not around. For the next 20 minutes while I waited for them, a man came and told me he knew exactly what I was there for, and he wanted to take me out sometime. When I politely told him I wasn't going on a free date with him, he said "oh no, I would never pay for sex. But I'm going to take you out anyways." Uhhh, no thanks creepy stranger, maybe next time? :P Posted via Mobile Device

Agreed with Kerri! Usually when you're messaging an SP, try and think of it as "treat them as you would like to be treated." Receiving really bad first messages never makes us want to see you. Got one today that just said, "How much do you weigh? I'm looking for the fat one." Oh stop, you're gonna make me blush! ;) Posted via Mobile Device