Is there a regulation?

[Jabba 18389]

Just musing here. I have a 2-part question.

 

1. Is there any rule of thumb or official regulation that determines the ratio of males/female for a gangbang?

 

2. Having never participated (I'm too shy to even consider it) I'm also curious about how these things actually get going. I envision everyone gets together at the room, get relaxed, have a few laughs - but who gets the courage up to ask for the 1st dance?...or is it just a free-for-all?

 

Does anyone have any actual experience to share their thoughts?

[Guest W***ledi*Time]

I've always thought that of a "gangbang" as involving many people (alias a "gang"), all focusing their attention and having sex with one single partner. I'd tend to think it would need to be a minimum of 3-on-1 to qualify.

 

As for "orgies", I'd guess the rule might be "the more the merrier", and the ideal would be a more-or-less balanced number of males and females (assuming we're talking hetero interests). As for getting it started, there's likely always someone who winds up being the instigator - be it the most outgoing person, or the horniest person of the moment. I've never participated in a gangbang or an orgy, though - so I'm presenting my impressions as an "outsider"!

[Maverick 2873]

I would imagine that at a gangbang the woman would initiate when she was comfortable, as the night is centered around her.

[qwertyaccount 15793]

Where is Charle Sheen/Harper when you need him - he'd know the answer to this in a heartbeat!

[Jabba 18389]

When was the last time anyone participated in a gangbang?

Was it at a hotel, private residence or outside?

[roamingguy 300291]

Not only have I not participated in one, I have no interest in participating.

Duos are one thing, but a gangbang, where man after man after man etc etc etc have sex with a lady...well I would want to be with a lady when she is fresh (for lack of a better word) Would a guy want to book an encounter with an sp right after she's had an encounter with another guy...and she schedules her day like that, client after client after client

Also, and I may be wrong here, but if a group of guys books a gangbang with a lady, and she's ok for the first couple guys, but then finds out it's not for her, and decides to stop, with a bunch of guys still waiting their turn...I see bad things could happen to her

But that's me

RG

[VedaSloan 119179]

Gangbangs can be very fun.

 

But as much as guys talk about liking or wanting to participate in one, when it comes down to actual booking, many chicken out. The last two I participated in, didn't even end up being gangbangs per se. The first one ended up as a threesome and the second a foursome (with another escort).

 

As I recall, we chatted for a bit prior, and then just went at it.

[Kubrickfan 12836]

There's a morning talk disk jockey at a radio station near where I live who says, on the topic of orgies, that he couldn't participate as he observes a strict "one weiner rule." That makes the math very easy.

[Miss Scarlett 25073]

With Orgies, usually there are many both men and women. Numbers are usually the more the merrier. With Gangbangs, usually it is one female taking many males. Either individually or more then one at a time. I have not participated in either events. But was at a location where an orgy was taking place. I was not comfortable enough to join in. I don't mind 3 sums and 4 sums, but more then that was too much for me.

 

Around here it is usually done in a private residence, to help with comfort levels.

 

This is just what I have seen in my area and does not define a specific way things are.

[Malika Fantasy 144625]

and 1 men and many women is a harem I guess?:cooter:

[SamanthaEvans 166766]

I've never been willing to do stag parties, graduations, team celebrations and the like. Frankly, I've been surprised to be asked at all at my age. But I do have a regular situation with three men who have been good friends for years. I see one of them each month and then all three of them, together, the fourth month. They're all in their 50s, mostly voyeuristic, I'd say, and all very nice guys. We long ago agreed that when the four of us get together, I start things whenever I'm ready. No pressure from anyone. They've agreed not to be offended by my first choice. It works. There's nothing very kinky or exotic about it. I'd say it's tamer than the individual meetings I have with each of them, on the whole.

 

They were very respectful when setting this up. One guy contacted me, told me what he was looking for, and said he'd like to book a solo appointment with me. I agreed to see him and said that I needed to have an opportunity to correspond with each of the others. I reserved the right to turn any of them down without having to explain. Beyond that, my usual restrictions applied to everyone. The whole thing has been remarkably easy. It's been going on for about a year and a half. Repeat business tends to mean happy clients! :icon_cool:

[Bethany Westbrooke 7532]

I would want to be with a lady when she is fresh (for lack of a better word) Would a guy want to book an encounter with an sp right after she's had an encounter with another guy...and she schedules her day like that, client after client after client

Also, and I may be wrong here, but if a group of guys books a gangbang with a lady, and she's ok for the first couple guys, but then finds out it's not for her, and decides to stop, with a bunch of guys still waiting their turn...I see bad things could happen to her

But that's me

RG

 

RG:Not to single you out, but this "fresh" comment is a recurring one and I have serious issues with it... So in discussing it, I would like to apologize if it seems uncalled for, I just happen to be reading this comment when I felt the need to speak out about this...

 

I see in a way that you wouldn't want to book an unkempt and overextended SP, but I don't really see the link between a gang-bang and a popular SP, not that there is anything wrong with gang-bangs.

 

As a professional, I feel that a popular SP would take the time to freshen up appropriately before meeting with you, regardless of the other men seen before you and in most cases, unless you book an early bird session, she has had sex already that day, if not the night before. And who is to say she hasn't had sex that morning with her SO?

 

Seeking a professional SP you are aware she has sex for money, and that she is likely very good at it. I understand not wanting to think about the other guys or see them in a gang bang but the reality is, most SPs can and do have sex with more than one client a day and not suffer any issues with freshness or quality. I realize that it can be a bit more of a personal service than say erotic massage, but it is a physical one, similar to erotic massage so why get fresh with the "fresh" comment? AFAIK few would comment on the "fresh"-ness of a popular MP working a 6 or 10 hour shift at a rub and tug so why is it so common in reference to SPs?

 

Re:gangbang comment, I would hope that the other men participating in the gangbang would not allow the sexually frustrated ones to harm or abuse the priviledge of the lady sharing herself with them. No means no, no matter what! To even think this scenario creeps me out more than you will ever know, makes me think of gang-rape a la Jodie Foster in "The Accused". A gang-bang is consensual adult sex and the second someone says Uncle, it should not be an issue for the participants to accept this. If it becomes one, then see above movie and call a lawyer...