Contact

[Exotic Touch Danielle 31902]

And here we go once again, this shit is never ending

Thank fck I ask for a deposit now, the guys that respect our safety and time will send and the ones that don't won't

 

[BenDover78 111]

I just had the opposite, provided the deposit and have the provider cancel on me 3 times. 

[MsManda 25992]

6 minutes ago, stevenwilson said:

Only simps and morons do that. At the end of the day, its business if you are not comfortable not sending deposits or your personal id then don't do it. There's literally hundred other options to choose from and majority of times even better. The entitlement is crazy. I do hear SPs point of view as well but just coz u have heard stories or burnt once doesn't mean you are going to treat every customer like shit. We don't deserve that. Its hard earned money i aint paying anyone a single penny up front even if i am richest man alive. Its about using common sense and having morals. You can be trusting anyone these days.

And for SPs if you don't feel comfortable taking clients without deposits and ID, go ahead don't accept any clients without it. I am pretty sure there are bunch of lonely weirdo simps who would willing give you everything. but us regular people, people who work in reputable companies and having family to back to, we cant be seen with any kind of evidence doing the deed. 

For customers, DONT EVER SEND DEPOSIT OR ID, 

For SPs, DONT ACCEPT CLIENTS IF YOU ARE NOT OK WIHTOUT DEPSOITS, its simply aint that hard.

There's always dozens of travelling SPs coming around, simps who want to give their personal identity and stay with local Sp, more power to them. But majority would prefer anonymity and privacy, and they indeed make more money offering that.

 

Thank goodness this guy doesn't dictate the norms and standards omg 🤦

[LadiesFirst 867]

41 minutes ago, stevenwilson said:

but us regular people, people who work in reputable companies and having family to back to

Perhaps we would do well to remember companions are somebody's daughter, sister, and in many cases mother, in short,  they too have families. 

 

[MsManda 25992]

5 minutes ago, LadiesFirst said:

Perhaps we would do well to remember companions are somebody's daughter, sister, and in many cases mother, in short,  they too have families. 

 

He sees us like the cops do

Nhi

No human involved 🤦

[MikeyInHalifax 545]

1 hour ago, stevenwilson said:

Only simps and morons do that. At the end of the day, its business if you are not comfortable not sending deposits or your personal id then don't do it. There's literally hundred other options to choose from and majority of times even better. The entitlement is crazy. I do hear SPs point of view as well but just coz u have heard stories or burnt once doesn't mean you are going to treat every customer like shit. We don't deserve that. Its hard earned money i aint paying anyone a single penny up front even if i am richest man alive. Its about using common sense and having morals. You can be trusting anyone these days.

And for SPs if you don't feel comfortable taking clients without deposits and ID, go ahead don't accept any clients without it. I am pretty sure there are bunch of lonely weirdo simps who would willing give you everything. but us regular people, people who work in reputable companies and having family to back to, we cant be seen with any kind of evidence doing the deed. 

For customers, DONT EVER SEND DEPOSIT OR ID, 

For SPs, DONT ACCEPT CLIENTS IF YOU ARE NOT OK WIHTOUT DEPSOITS, its simply aint that hard.

There's always dozens of travelling SPs coming around, simps who want to give their personal identity and stay with local Sp, more power to them. But majority would prefer anonymity and privacy, and they indeed make more money offering that.

 

Who hurt you?

[Skilled Hands 224]

1 hour ago, stevenwilson said:

Only simps and morons do that. At the end of the day, its business if you are not comfortable not sending deposits or your personal id then don't do it. There's literally hundred other options to choose from and majority of times even better. The entitlement is crazy. I do hear SPs point of view as well but just coz u have heard stories or burnt once doesn't mean you are going to treat every customer like shit. We don't deserve that. Its hard earned money i aint paying anyone a single penny up front even if i am richest man alive. Its about using common sense and having morals. You can be trusting anyone these days.

And for SPs if you don't feel comfortable taking clients without deposits and ID, go ahead don't accept any clients without it. I am pretty sure there are bunch of lonely weirdo simps who would willing give you everything. but us regular people, people who work in reputable companies and having family to back to, we cant be seen with any kind of evidence doing the deed. 

For customers, DONT EVER SEND DEPOSIT OR ID, 

For SPs, DONT ACCEPT CLIENTS IF YOU ARE NOT OK WIHTOUT DEPSOITS, its simply aint that hard.

There's always dozens of travelling SPs coming around, simps who want to give their personal identity and stay with local Sp, more power to them. But majority would prefer anonymity and privacy, and they indeed make more money offering that.

 

 

[Skilled Hands 224]

[Pamela Luscious 401]

No one is entitled to a SWER’s time. If someone isn’t comfortable with an escort who screens, has clear boundaries and remains selective, then they were simply never her target client. And just because you consider yourself a good client doesn’t necessarily mean you are a good client for her. A good client for her is someone who does not question her limits or her screening process.

 

Not all money is good money, and I think it’s positive to see more and more SWERs able to prioritize their safety and their standards. Being selective is a luxury and unfortunately it’s not a reality for everyone in this industry. But those who can do it are also helping normalize healthier boundaries.

 

I also think it’s powerful to see women able to choose, to be free in how they work and to decide what is right for them. Our freedom and autonomy should never be negotiable. No one has control over our choices, our limits or how we choose to manage our careers.

 

We also shouldn’t be afraid to be firm in our boundaries out of fear of blackmail, pressure or fake bad reviews. Setting clear limits from the start isn’t being difficult, it’s simply respecting yourself and protecting your safety.

 

The more we normalize screening, freedom of choice and respect for boundaries, the healthier this industry becomes for everyone.

[Skilled Hands 224]

11 hours ago, BenDover78 said:

I just had the opposite, provided the deposit and have the provider cancel on me 3 times. 

But how did it end? Did you eventually have your deposit applied and eventually were able to book? 

 

[BenDover78 111]

9 hours ago, Skilled Hands said:

But how did it end? Did you eventually have your deposit applied and eventually were able to book? 

 

I had my deposit applied to each of my bookings, and they kept canceling until the 3rd booking, then they never replied at all. Still haven't contacted me after texted and called. I've never had a SP do this to me before and it has caused me to lose trust. I understand why they ask for a deposit but ghosting a client can't be good for their business.

[minuteman06 534]

I wonder if this discussion will ever end 🤔

It's a rinse and repeat conversation that constantly comes up; just change a few of the characters and it starts all over again with no resolve.  

I'm actually amazed at the time it takes for some people to type out the length of reply they post, good for you, shows you're passionate about the topic.  However, history is doomed to repeat itself and here we are again, sigh. 

Until the end of time (in Canada anyway because I don't see any laws changing soon), we will always have clients who pay deposits, clients who don't pay deposits, each has their reasoning.  We will also have swers who require a deposit and we will have swers who don't require a deposit.  Pretty simple, not rocket science, let's move on and stop beating this dead horse.

[dadawg 161]

2 hours ago, minuteman06 said:

I wonder if this discussion will ever end 🤔

It's a rinse and repeat conversation that constantly comes up; just change a few of the characters and it starts all over again with no resolve.  

I'm actually amazed at the time it takes for some people to type out the length of reply they post, good for you, shows you're passionate about the topic.  However, history is doomed to repeat itself and here we are again, sigh. 

Until the end of time (in Canada anyway because I don't see any laws changing soon), we will always have clients who pay deposits, clients who don't pay deposits, each has their reasoning.  We will also have swers who require a deposit and we will have swers who don't require a deposit.  Pretty simple, not rocket science, let's move on and stop beating this dead horse.

True enough, but always started by lyla member,  and responded to by providers. You can see why they bite each time, safety, their safety in this wacko world, they are probably sick of saying it, and have much better things to do. While I'm on the soapbox lol, who actually sticks up for providers other than themselves? Still an underground occupation in this so called inclusive woke society, I know there are sketchy ones, but that that isn't the case on this thread.

On the upside beautiful sunny Saturday in Scotia.

[Pamela Luscious 401]

3 hours ago, minuteman06 said:

I wonder if this discussion will ever end 🤔

It's a rinse and repeat conversation that constantly comes up; just change a few of the characters and it starts all over again with no resolve.  

I'm actually amazed at the time it takes for some people to type out the length of reply they post, good for you, shows you're passionate about the topic.  However, history is doomed to repeat itself and here we are again, sigh. 

Until the end of time (in Canada anyway because I don't see any laws changing soon), we will always have clients who pay deposits, clients who don't pay deposits, each has their reasoning.  We will also have swers who require a deposit and we will have swers who don't require a deposit.  Pretty simple, not rocket science, let's move on and stop beating this dead horse.

 I just want to clarify something.

Here, we often see members say they won’t see an escort who screens or who has strict boundaries. It’s fine to have preferences. But we also need to be aware of the impact that kind of discourse can have.

When new girls in the industry constantly read that screening drives clients away or that too many boundaries are a “turn off,” it can create pressure. Especially for those who need money quickly. It can push them to lower their standards, screen less or accept things they don’t really want to accept.

And that can become dangerous. For their safety and for their mental health.

If I’m speaking about this, It’s because this is a reality most of us have experienced at one point or another. I’m speaking here for the safety of women in this industry and to normalize having strong boundaries without fear of pressure, retaliation or coercion.

[MikeyInHalifax 545]

3 hours ago, minuteman06 said:

I wonder if this discussion will ever end 🤔

It's a rinse and repeat conversation that constantly comes up; just change a few of the characters and it starts all over again with no resolve.  

I'm actually amazed at the time it takes for some people to type out the length of reply they post, good for you, shows you're passionate about the topic.  However, history is doomed to repeat itself and here we are again, sigh. 

Until the end of time (in Canada anyway because I don't see any laws changing soon), we will always have clients who pay deposits, clients who don't pay deposits, each has their reasoning.  We will also have swers who require a deposit and we will have swers who don't require a deposit.  Pretty simple, not rocket science, let's move on and stop beating this dead horse.

My bone to pick is the denigrating language used against swers. 

 

You want to use their services but look at them with scorn the second they want some small measure of knowing who they are dealing with. As if they should just open themselves up to whatever is coming through the door no questions asked.

 

Like I said before. If you don't like the things an SP requires, don't see that SP. But don't go complaining and moaning about the standards she keeps. Move on.

 

 

[LadiesFirst 867]

On 2/27/2026 at 4:10 PM, MsManda said:

He sees us like the cops do

Nhi

No human involved 🤦

I've been thinking about this. Very sad after all this time we’re blinded to the benefits of this industry. It's because of the laws that the screening burden increases.

The moral high ground is being held by politicians, politicians who are in many cases jealous women and wives who see companions as a personal threat, and men and husbands who are only voting no because their wives are watching, white-knuckling through the vote and clearing their browser history the moment they get home. SMH.

They make laws to eliminate one of the world's oldest professions, claiming the moral high ground, putting an end to trafficking and exploitation, protecting women. Giving themselves pats on the back and congratulations on the clarity of it all. All while making the very thing they're trying to prevent worse and unnecessarily more dangerous. Denying a basic human need doesn't make it disappear, it just manifests in likely more violent ways. Good grief.

The oldest of human desires, connection, touch, intimacy, they don't go away because of a law. As a result screening becomes more stringent, companions have less protection and fewer avenues for recourse. It becomes much more important to know who is coming through the door. THE LAWS MADE THE COMPANION HER OWN LAST LINE OF DEFENCE, RESPONSIBLE FORHER OWN SURVIVAL.

There is little talk of the good. I was depressed for years. Clinical settings didn't do it for me. Medication, talking about feelings, no dice. Then one day, from this very site, BAM! Now we're talking gym, diet, reading, appearance, and not to be outdone, fewer vices. This "hobbyist" one replaces those ones, and I think that's a good thing. Been giving myself, you know, all of the positive self care routine. Now that is making a positive change on health care costs for society as a whole, by leaps and bounds.

Too bad they wouldn't look at it in terms of societal benefits. I'm proof, and I'm sure there are millions of others. People should be able to charge this shit to Blue Cross and Sun Life for crying out loud. They could look at it in terms of tax revenue, it's a big industry. They did it with cannabis. It would create well paying jobs, though I believe there are very few people who can successfully pull this off, given the emotional intelligence required to be successful. Well spoken, well educated, professional. Able to compartmentalize two lives, deal with clients, uphold boundaries without stepping on toes, very talented human beings. Very pretty.

So yeah, all that rambling, I think the laws cause the screening. Please continue to screen, it's reprehensible for people to want to partake anonymously. Shame on those with the inability to put themselves in the shoes of another. 200 plus ponders coming to see hundred and nothing pound angels….anonymously wtf.

If you are short on time, apologies if you read this. If you're a companion you will not be compensated for your time reading this, you embarked on this read yourself. I'm bored apparently, but if you're reading this, I am not alone.