Jump to content

dread pirate roberts

Senior Member (100+ Posts)
  • Content Count

    189
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by dread pirate roberts


  1. You might ask them in advance what their goal is in talking to you. Sometimes they have a specific plan in mind - "let's interview someone from a group that supports the new law, and an expert who says it will endanger women, and someone in the industry".

     

    Maybe they are looking for a sex worker to say "Parliament does not understand the reality of sex work". Or maybe they want someone to say "I have been exploited all my life, thank heavens Parliament is helping me out". Or they might genuinely have no agenda from the start, but either way it could be worth trying to find out whether what you want to say is what they want to hear - it could matter.

     

    Also, take the lead from politicians and "stay on message". Decide what it is you want to say, and say it, no matter what. It makes no difference what their questions are, your answer should be the message you want to convey!

    • Like 5

  2. In the spirit of open discussion - why with no MM touching? I see what an MFF threesome adds to the mix, and I see what would be added to the mix in an MMFF foursome with MM touching, but I don't see what's added with no MM touching - for you, that is, I see what could be added for the FFs.

     

    Welcome to CERB, by the way - this isn't a a criticism or an attack, just a friendly question.

    • Like 1

  3. I'm not suggesting blame on anyone's part, but there is a potentially useful object lesson here for everyone who is booking a hotel and has a rendezvous in mind. It's hard to deny, I think, that some hotels are easier than others to walk into unnoticed, and it would make sense to book at one where this is easy.

     

    I recently stayed at a hotel while on a trip, and had at least contemplated inviting a local SP to visit me. It turned out, though, that my hotel had what amounted to an airlock - an inner set of automatic doors which would not open until the outer ones had shut, leaving anyone entering standing there for about ten seconds. It also had a very small lobby with the elevators located behind the reception desk. The reception staff - who couldn't help but see the people waiting in the airlock fifteen feet away - engaged in some way with everyone who came in, it seemed, making a discreet and anonymous entry essentially impossible. Had I known the physical layout in advance, I would certainly have booked at one of the many hotels into which it is easy to walk in unobserved.

     

    Actually, I think it would be a service to all (and especially to SPs) to engage in discussion (in the abstract only) about which hotels in any given locale do or do not lend themselves to anonymity. That would be unwise in cities so small that it amounts to saying "here is the only hotel SPs should stay at", but barring that unusual situation it would be a valuable resource.

    • Like 1

  4. I haven't read every post in this thread, so I apologize if this has already been mentioned.

     

    An academic study is being conducted at the moment, surveying clients of sex workers - you can find it here: http://www.sexsafetysecurity.ca/

     

    I've been planning to do it but haven't had the chance, so I can't speak in detail about the content, but it appears to be a legitimate academic study. That is, it seems like a chance for hobbyists on this board to help the public understanding of what clients actually are like, and clear up some misperceptions: in other words, just what Nathalie was asking about.

    • Like 1

  5. Honestly, I am running out of enthusiastic adjectives to describe how much you will enjoy an encounter with Annaharris - breathtaking, mind-boggling, numinous (look it up, I had to).

     

    She is in town till Saturday - you will NOT regret the decision to see her.

    • Thanks 1

  6. If you have ever toyed with the idea of having an encounter with a shemale, toy with it no longer - go see Lola and let her toy with you! To say that she is "passable" is to damn with faint praise - seeing her you would have no doubt that you are in the company of a very attractive woman. At least, you will have no doubt until things proceed to the point that it becomes abundantly clear that the "male" part in "shemale" has very real meaning here. (Imagine me gesturing, holding my hands a surprising distance apart right now!)

     

    Lola is attractive, friendly, hot, and simultaneously a beautiful woman and a really hung man, with all the permutations that makes possible. She will treat you gently if you wish, or take charge if you prefer. If you are at all hesitant about the new situation, as one might be, she will help you past that. I won't go into details here (except one - when I noted "msog", I meant Lola, not me!) but feel free to pm me.

     

    She's only here another couple of days, so don't miss your chance. You will enjoy it!

    • Like 3

  7. Exotic Touch Daneille says "I love my tits to be sucked and having a hard cock in between them!! Yeah I know I'm a naughty girl lol hell just cum all over them !"

     

    I am happy to attest that this is indeed so. :)

     

    Comparisons are odious, so I don't want to offer an opinion on whose are "best", but judged purely on their own? Yeah, her breasts are amazing!

    • Like 2

  8. Let me add my voice to these fans of Lilly. A charming woman who can make you feel immediately welcome (in the best possible way!), and will see to your every need while providing wonderful massage and more. I'll be back!

    • Like 1

  9. So many posts about how nice Katherine is! And that's true - when she senses it's what you want. But be warned that Mistress Katherine can appear just when you least expect (but most desire) it.

     

    What a lovely greeting at the door, a kiss between old friends, so solicitous in undressing you, her nipples grazing your back as she massages you, her hands so firm yet gentle in stroking you, slipping the cuffs onto your wrists....wait. Cuffs? Katherine, why have you put...I'm sorry, I mean Mistress Katherine, my legs, you've chained them! No, wait, don't blindfold me, is that a paddle that you are hol...ouch!! That hurt, Katherine OUCH!! I mean Mistress Katherine!

     

    What are you strapping on Mistress, why are you pulling my legs so far apart, MisTRESS!! Slower please Mistr - OUCH! yes, Mistress, i will only do what you say, Mistress, I will turn over if you wish Mistress and mmph llmmff hmmmllph brmmffthh yes Mistress, I'm glad I was able to do that for you Mistress - a reward, Mistress, yes, Mistress, you are such a kind Mistress to wrap your lips around my ..around my - ohhhhh! Mistressssss... A kiss from you, Mistress, now, with your mouth filled with...yes Mmmmistresssmmmmmm!

     

    Or, you know, she'd ONLY be nice to you if you'd prefer that.


  10. Thank you, everyone, for your contributions to this thread. That one should communicate and should not assume is of course good advice. In fact it was the point my questions were aimed at in the first place.

     

    I didn't, after all, ask "what does PSE mean?" My questions were what message SPs thought they were conveying if they said it, and what message hobbyists thought they were receiving if they heard it. My guess was that those were not always the same message: the discussion seems to confirm that.

    • Like 2

  11. I'm curious about the use of this term. When an SP says, for example, "greek" ( or for that matter "no greek") pretty much all of us understand. We have a shared understanding, and hobbyists are confident that they know exactly what message the SP was intending to convey.

     

    I wonder whether that's true of "PSE". Personally I am never sure what is meant by the term, and I don't think that is because there is a shared understanding out there of which I happen to be ignorant (though of course that is what I would think if I were ignorant of it, I suppose).

     

    In any case -

     

    Ladies, what message do you understand to be conveyed by an SP saying "porn star experience"?

     

    Gentlemen, what message do you think you are receiving when you hear "porn star experience"?

     

    (Please note this is not intended as a criticism of any SP for either using or not using this term. I'm just curious.)


  12. " Some women are fine with being objectified regarding services and others like myself are not."

     

    This is actually the most important issue here for me. I have opinions about BBBJs (hey, I'm a guy, I like them, what would you expect) but I don't want to reduce my opinion of an SP to a yes/no option on a particular physical act. Yes, I really enjoy BBBJs, but only some of the SPs whose company I most enjoy are comfortable with them, and that's fine, that's part of the package.

     

    It sometimes seems, with new members, that they have not yet entirely taken on board that CERB is not simply a site for hobbyists. "Locker room talk" is not the correct standard of discourse. (Though having spent a lot of time in locker rooms, I'm willing to say that such talk isn't actually all that common there.) That said, I don't mean to criticise OP, who actually was trying to be inclusive with his initial question.

    • Like 4

  13. It's been said before, but I wonder this every time I see one of these "what about so-and-so on BP/CL" questions: why wonder about them? I mean, yes, I get the curiosity, the draw of the new - but still.

     

    Here you are on CERB. CERB is overflowing with charming and skilled SPs of every shape and size, catering to pretty much every taste. They are vouched for, reliable in their claims, and a known quantity - not to mention known quality.

     

    Why come here to ask about anonymous SPs posting in an unreliable forum? It's like going to the finest restaurant in town and then asking your fellow diners whether they know anything about the local McDonalds.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...