Jump to content

WriteOn

Banned Users
  • Content Count

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by WriteOn


  1. But by using terms like fag, and faggot allowed for a dehumanizing treatment of homosexuals.......

     

     

    If you think that passing this Bill will have men who pay for sex in ANY way shape or form treated like homosexuals have been in the past and in too many cases still are treated today by society then I don't know what to say to you.

     

    Do you think there will be a wiki page like this for "John's" if the Law is passed?

     

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significant_acts_of_violence_against_LGBT_people


  2. I realize the person who wrote this was gay, but I find the comparison between homosexuals and "John's" ridiculous. Do I think that people in the public will want to murder and torture "Johns" like they have done to homosexuals in the past, I really don't think so.

     

    Will there be a "Mathew Sheppard" of "John's", I really don't think so. I think it's great that the writer is showing support, but to compare how society has treated homosexuals and WILL treat "John's" if this law passes is a bit over the line, IMO.


  3. Couple things, not sure if like Asians and also, it's been over a year since I've been in Ottawa, but there was this Asian lady on Somerset who really exercises your balls nicely and plays with your ass while you're lying on your stomach. She will do a prostate massage as well.

     

    Not sure the number on Somerset but there are 2 Asian places almost beside each other and if you're going down Somerset it is the first place on your right.

     

    Hope this is helpful.

    • Like 1

  4. A different profile of who clients and workers are needs to be presented to the public. If the public sees a valid position beyond the one-sided propaganda of the abolitionists, they may pressure the government to address the issue. That's a much louder voice than a bunch of industry insiders.

     

    I'm not sure the voices of anonymous faceless people will help either. I'm not trying to discourage anyone from doing something to try and help out but I'm not sure what exactly you're suggesting you're going to do with feedback from members here.


  5. No sadly the Tories are just being Machiavellian. Sneaky mofos.

     

    They will have committee hearings on the bill during summer recess. There will be less reporters around to cover it and we will know less about what is going on.

     

    Ok, but there won't be any votes cast in Parliament for the Bill until they return.


  6. The only problem I can see is in starting this thread instead of rebooking with her.

    I don't see anything unprofessional in having a pre-paid session, especially when you have seen her times previously and have developed a good rapport, until now.

     

     

    Like another member who left a comment on his post this thread seems to have annoyed you. Except for the fact that this thread is in the Ottawa section the MA is not identified so I'm not sure what the issue is . It seems like a perfectly legitimate question to me.

     

    It's an interesting characterization, "a pre-paid" session. For all the talk about karma the ladies here are professional business women, many I'm sure pay their bills and put food on their tables from this business.

     

    What if the guy showed up and said, I don't have any cash right now but I'll pay you double next session? Does that work?


  7. Why didn't they vote? Are they just not there? I know Libby Davies wanted to be for the debate, but had committee she had to be in instead. That is a LOT of NDP mps, that vote could have easily been defeated with only a few votes.

     

     

    I'm sure it's very common for members to miss votes for a variety of reasons. If the Government thought there was a chance they would lose then all of the Conservative members would have been present you can be sure.

    • Like 1

  8. The following Bloc members did not vote:

     

    .........

     

    The above list of people are the ones we need focus on to get them to vote NO to Bill C-36.

     

    I'm not sure that this is the best indicator on which members to focus on. There are many reasons MP's do not vote on bills. It COULD be that they don't support it or it could be they had other things to do.

     

    Bottom line is the Conservatives have a majority. I doubt any Conservative would put their political life on the line for this Bill.

    • Like 2

  9. Because it isn't just about you. It's also about the lady, her wishes, and her boundaries. And many ladies state in their websites they do not want graphic reviews. So posting on CERB (or other board) details about something you and a lady did in private and which she wishes kept private, is why it is inappropriate to talk about it in a public forum.

     

    No one was asking for graphic reviews. It was "a question for the ladies", the ladies who are not comfortable with sharing are free not to respond.

     

    I might expect this response in the BBJCIMSW thread, but I am surprised to see it here. But then again, to each their own :)

    • Like 1

  10. I would have to say that unless you have had ladies complain about how you DATY then it should be kept private. I would say most ladies will tell you if it is not working for them when you perform DATY.

     

    I would think most ladies will keep this private as one person said some guys would try everything that was posted in the original post.

     

     

    Why would you keep something private that gives you pleasure? Now if you asked women you work with the question I could see how it would be inappropriate. But, if this isn't the site where this question could/should be asked then I ask you where should a fellow go to get tips on how to pleasure a woman orally??

     

    This is a site full of women you have more experience than your average woman, they know common things that most guys do wrong, they know what things guys do that they like, why not share? Why keep it private? I honestly don't get that point of view.

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...