Gregsand

My comment was not directed to you and was more a personal opinion while agreeing with Sensual Erin's comment. I also love kissing. But when it feels forced and awkward from the lack of chemistry, I rather not do at all. Doesn't matter if a massage or full GFE. If things don't click face to face, not much can be done. Some are better than other to hide their true feelings, but in deeper intimacy the reality tends to surface. Again, it's something that should happen spontaneously and not be dealt as a checkmark on a list of options.

My sentiments exactly. A dose of sincerity is required to make a passionate kiss work. With many providers offering "a la carte" options, it makes things more forced than it should. I prefer paying for the time and let things happen. If the chemistry and other conditions are right, the experience will feel much more real. The basic stuff is an easy sell. But for more intimate things like kissing, both need to be on same page.

Considering attraction, chemistry and hygiene will make kissing welcomed and enjoyable, I'm not sure it should be considered a normal "extra". I really enjoy doing it. But if it feels more awkward than mutual, I rather not do it at all. And with MA's it should be more of a surprise than the norm. With so many SP's posing as MA's, it blurs the lines on what should be considered normal in a massage session. Unless made clear upfront, reciprocation, kissing and happy finishes should not be expected. I rather go blind and be surprised by unexpected intimacy, than plan everything in detail and end up disappointed. Even in a context of adult services, some things can't be faked and should be dealt with behind closed doors.

Instead of being a smartass, you should maybe familiarize yourself with the rules of this website. On top of the Escort and Massage discussions forums, you'll see the DNR/DND LIST(Do Not Review/Do Not Discuss): http://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/announcement.php?f=20&a=10 Even if her name is not on the list, the fact she clearly asked for privacy and not be the topic of discussions on review boards should be considered as the same. If you want to play with words and technicalities, the mod will be more than happy to help you. Take this as a friendly advice. Good night.

The last line of her ad says: "Please, no review boards as I like my privacy, thank you." Nuff said.

Harvey (1950) An old classic starring James Stewart.

Future Force (1989) An hilariously bad B movie starring the late David Carradine.

Just don't try the "David Carradine" technique. It's effective but the side effects are pretty bad and permanent. (Google it, I'm not explaining that joke here)

Yentl(1983) with Barbra Streisand.

Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story(2007) A parody of "Walk the Line"(story of Johnny Cash) starring John C. Reilly.

Supersonic Man(1979) A cheap Spanish Superman ripoff. An entertainly funny B movie starring Cameron Mitchell as the bad guy.

Queen Kong (1976) And yes, it's a real movie. Google it!

Nice sarcastic way to say you plan to break your resolution soon to prevent ladies from recommending you the sofa or proverbial "doghouse". LOL

As a fan of the two first "Alien" movies(and consider some of the others like guilty pleasures) I was looking forward to see "Alien: Covenant". And the movie was not only bad, but plain insulting. To put things in context, Ridley Scott who directed the first movie in 1979, returned to the franchise with "Prometheus(2012)". That movie was not perfect with a messy script and a confusing marketing. It was advertised as a separated story in the "Alien" universe but also kind of a prequel. The result was a visually stunning movie with an intelligent sci-fi story with themes of creation and evolution. But that was only in the first half. For the rest of the movie it became pretty dumb and confusing. But it was different with minor story problems a proper sequel could fix. And this is where "Covenant" pretty much f.. up the franchise. Without going into spoilers, "Alien: Covenant" tells a completely different story and only answer some questions through a convoluted plot, flashbacks and one-liners. And if throwing the previous movie under the bus was not bad enough, they created a completely stupid and unnecessary origin story of the xenomorph(a.k.a. the alien creature). It's not only dumb, but sucks the mystery that made it such a terrifying monster. And for the rest of the movie, it becomes a cliché slasher without any creativity. Unacceptable coming from a director like Ridley Scott. If you're unfamiliar with the franchise and want to see great sci-fi thrillers, watch "Alien" and "Aliens". As for that cinematic turkey, simply avoid.

Great. Thank you and keep up the great work. Merry holiday. ;-)

Again, It's a small nitpick and not a huge deal. As for the odds, it varies with the randomness of the pictures appearing. Like everyone here, when I see a nice thumbnail I like to know and see more. But after a series of dead ends, I just wanted to mention it. Take care and have a nice holiday.

McHale's Navy(1997) A not so great modern adaptation of a TV series of the 60's that started Ernest Borgnine. The movie stars Tom Arnold and is quite disappointing. The only saving grace is the presence of Tim Curry who delivers a great over the top performance and a small role by the legendary Bruce Campbell.

The more information, references and links, the easier the research. And if something doesn't stick, avoid her. I see it as a good thing.

I'm pretty sure I'm not the first who mention this, but the "Random Album Pictures" bar is a bit frustrating as about 50% of the pictures lead to an error message because many accounts were closed/deleted. I understand it's not a priority and not asking the mod to immediately jump on the issue. But just wanted to mention it. Have a nice holiday.

My thoughts exactly.

A link would seriously help. Additional Comments: If you're talking about her: https://ottawa.craigslist.ca/ths/d/my-hands-are-here-for-you/6433423905.html She gives very good straight massages. Her place is clean and private.

Once online it can certainly surface in job interviews, divorce proceedings or just plain blackmail. A lot of young women get tempted because it's easy money. But most find out the wrong way how much it limits their future and how little control they got over their image.

I started seeing providers in the early 90's when the idea of getting pictures and information online was pretty much in the realm of science fiction. And I can say that if you ask the right questions, listen for inconsistences and honest with yourself if things sound and look wrong, you should be able to filter out the bad apples. A 5 or 10 minute conversation on the phone is more than enough to get a good idea on who you're meeting. If things look too good to be true or a procurer tells you she can't speak on the phone, this should raise serious red flags. Up to you to know what you want and be comfortable enough to walk away if something looks wrong. Reviews are subjectives and don't always reflect someone's true nature. It's often a reaction of expectations meeting reality. If you know what you want and she can provide it, it's your loss if you use the excuse of a lack of online information to not meet her. Your a grown man , it's your call.

While the idea of secure ID websites seems like a good idea for the safety of lobbyists and providers alike, for now those should be strongly avoided. Most of those websites are fraudulent and only exist to collect personal and credit card information. If a provider can't provide you with an email or phone number and forces you into one of those websites, just ignore her.

Don't want to sound like an alarmist, but I could easily post more than a hundred reasons on why this is a bad idea. If you choose to go through with this, better do it with someone you know well and be 100% sure on how it will be filmed, edited and saved. Better live with a distorted memory than live with the consequences of those kind of souvenirs going public. It may not bother you now, but in ten or twenty years your personal and professional life could be deeply impacted by it. Take care.