Pamela Luscious

•Ah, so someone that goes through the screening process MUST be a 'good' client automatically? I wasn't aware it was 100% effective. -where did i say that? I even quoted myself. •do you LOOK at all the ads out there? in 5 short years it's gone from 10% fake to 90% fake, and that's not an exaggeration. -How is that our problem? You have more than enough tools other than leolist to find legit escorts. That’s a you problem. Enjoy your podcast I'm not listening to that.

•Even now, I'd say over 90% don't do screenings? -"90% don’t screen?" Then book them. You have options, so there’s no need to argue with those who do. •I was just asking "sooooo how exactly does it make you safer?" Or it doesn't ?..... and it's just a habit for your peace of mind? -We've explained it. You won't understand. The specific logistics aren’t your business. •If you admit you're still at risk, then aren't you exposing yourself to that double-satndard? Choosing to punish the innocent for the crimes of the crappy scumbags that intend to so you harm? -No. Good clients don’t feel punished, they get to spend time with us. they screen, book, and move forward. The only ones who feel punished are the ones trying to bypass screening, and they were never our clients to begin with.

The ignorance it funny at this point. You're getting these stats from where? Personal experience? Because clearly you're not getting this from actual sex workers. We don’t care about ‘potential.’ We care about who books properly. True gentlemen read, screen, and send a deposit. The rest can move along. At the end of the day, we set the rules. Whoever YOU consider a ‘good client’ isn’t necessarily a good client for someone who screens. As for ‘losing money,’ don’t worry about our wallets, we’re booked. Screening isn’t about punishing good clients. And let’s be clear: the most high-profile clients we see, CEOs, politicians, athletes, etc. have far more to lose than most, and they screen without hesitation. If they can respect the process, so can anyone else. The only men who object are the ones trying to bypass screening, and that isn’t entitlement we reward.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/murder-day-parole-eustachio-gallese-1.5439020 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/courtepatte-killer-also-guilty-of-prostitute-s-murder-1.1083335 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/serial-killer-robert-pickton-dead-1.7221260

Uhhh… yeah, that’s the whole point. Even with screening, we are still at risk, but obviously we’re going to do our best to protect ourselves. So your alternative is what? Just agree to meet anyone with a fake number, no deposit, no screening? Okay… So who’s coming to see me then? How many actually show up? How many send threats or waste my time? ‘No face, no case’.

How is this a double standard? We literally expose ourselves online every single day to prove legitimacy. Ads are verified, socials are linked, we post many photos, we collaborate with others. Our reputations are public and constantly scrutinized. You, on the other hand, are hiding behind a random phone number and nothing else. You call it ‘fear mongering,’ but the truth is we are targeted. Escorts have been stalked, assaulted, and murdered by clients. That’s not overthinking, that’s fact. You asking me to just hand out selfies, my hotel room number, or my ID is reckless. I risk losing my safety, or worse. Those are not the same stakes. And please stop comparing this to hiring a deck builder. No deck builder is meeting strangers behind closed doors in a stigmatized industry with their body on the line. Screening is not a power play. It’s a survival tool. So yes, we screen. If that makes you uncomfortable, this hobby isn’t for you. White male privilege is assuming you can dismiss women’s safety because it doesn’t affect you personally.

No one is trying to change your mind robert. Stay with your fear and leolist scam ads, we don't care... Point is. As a client it's your job to do proper research before booking. And legitimate swers have a screening process. The end. Simple as that.

There's so many amazing gentlemen out there who screen and follow our booking process without questions. They read out ads and websites and do proper research, they never been scammed. They treat us good and have an amazing time during the date. Why waste our time with the one's who give us headache with just booking lol...

Sell your identity 😂 be for real. You should worry about facebook actually selling your real life data more than us just having your name or drivers license.

It's your job to do the proper research and choose someone that makes you feel safe. A legitimate swer has already done her part proving she's real. https://www.lyla.ch/topic/214084-how-to-screen-an-indépendant/

🔸️Campbellton 20-25 🔸️Bathurst 25-26 🔸️Moncton 26-28 🔸️Halifax 28-3 🔸️Fredericton 3-8 🔥Duet with Brooklyn Allure🔥 www.pamelaluscious.com

🔸️Campbellton 20-25 🔸️Bathurst 25-26 🔸️Moncton 26-28 🔸️Halifax 28-3 🔸️Fredericton 3-8 www.pamelaluscious.com

Fredericton 1 availability left tonight! Saturday fully booked! 1 availability left Sunday mid day!

Only a few availability left! Moncton 15-17 Fredericton 17-21 Name__, Age__, City__, Day__, Time__, How long__, Service__, Incall/outcall__

I only have 2 availability left in Moncton ▪︎ Campbellton now-15 ▪︎ Bathurst canceled (no deposits) ▪︎ Moncton 15-17 ▪︎ Fredericton 17-21

You're talking about rates. I stayed on topic 😉

Gaslighting, deflection, ego stroking, power games… yawn. Textbook. It’s none of your business to ask if a woman is “worth” her rate. End of story. I don’t care how offended you are, my words weren’t meant to coddle you. If you’re offended that I support women’s rights and autonomy, that’s entirely on you. You were never my clientele to begin with. I’m uninterested and bored about your income. I’ve said what I needed to say, and I’m not entertaining it. You’ve exposed yourself clearly as a client, my job here is done.

Do you know what budgeting means? Just because someone has money doesn’t mean they want to fit a provider into their budget. I said budget, not income. There’s a difference. If you wish to discuss your income with everyone, you’re more than welcome to open a new thread bragging about your riches. To be honest, I’m uninterested and won’t be participating.

Let me put it simply: Let’s say you usually book providers around $300. Then you come across someone who’s your exact type, but she charges $500. If she’s within your budget, you either book her or you don’t, no questions, no debate. That’s her rate. End of story. You might end up having the best experience of your life. Or maybe your favorite provider ends up being someone at $250. That’s how personal preference works, not price tags. But the issue is when people start complaining, dissecting, and comparing groups of women like we’re two different models of fleshlight. That’s not curiosity, that’s dehumanizing. We’re not toys. We’re human beings. You either book or move on. It really is that simple. If you don’t want to “risk” spending more on someone at a higher rate, then don’t. No one’s forcing you. But someone else is booking her, and they’re not turning it into a debate.

Trust me, we don’t care about your income. We care about respect and proper bookings. Your budget is the last thing on our minds… actually, it’s not on our minds at all. 😉

First of all, I appreciate your ability to communicate respectfully without getting emotional, that’s rare and valuable in these discussions. That said, I want to clarify something: I never said that clients who book within their budget are dehumanizing, nor did I say that providers who charge less are “dragging down” others. What I have said, and I’ve repeated this multiple times now, is that asking whether providers who charge more are “worth it” is disrespectful and dehumanizing. That specific framing reduces a human being to a price tag and treats her work, boundaries, and self-worth as something for strangers to publicly dissect. That’s the issue. I’ve also acknowledged, repeatedly, that two providers at different price points may offer the same type of service on paper, but they are still different people. And because we are not robots or blowup dolls, the experience will be different. Our rates are based on many things beyond just the act itself, it's energy, time, boundaries, style, lifestyle, demand, and personal comfort. I fully support every provider’s right to charge what aligns with her goals, whether that’s a lower or higher rate. And yes, every client also has the autonomy to choose services within their budget. But what they don’t have is the right to pick apart women they’re not even planning to book, just because those women don’t fit their budget. You said it “feels like we can’t talk about rates.” Well… that’s kind of the point. Rates are personal and business decisions made by each provider for herself. It’s not open for public debate or cost-benefit analysis, especially by those who were never going to book her anyway. It’s her time, her energy, her sensuality, her boundaries... her. If someone doesn’t understand that or thinks he’s entitled to question her pricing like he’s shopping on Amazon, then that’s not a respectful discussion about value, that’s objectification, plain and simple. If a client can’t afford a higher rate or doesn’t personally see the value, he is always free to book within his budget. But that should never turn into a debate about the worth of women who were never on his radar to begin with, because someone else is booking her. And respecting that is the bare minimum.

A client is absolutely within his right to choose how he spends his money. It’s his personal choice to seek out a service that fits his budget. But it’s also his responsibility to do proper research, to ensure his safety and to avoid being disappointed or scammed. That means reading her website, checking her reviews, browsing her social media. all of which give a clear picture of her personality, style, and the kind of experience she offers. The issue with this thread, however, is that it lumps together a group of women who choose to charge more, and compares them to a group who charge less. That approach helps no one. It doesn't guide clients, it dehumanizes women. Each provider decides for herself what to charge. And yes, two different women might offer similar services at different rates, but they are still two different people, not interchangeable blow-up dolls. Your experience with one will naturally differ from another. So asking “why does she charge more?” has one answer: because she can. Book within your means and respect our autonomy. Stop questioning our worth. It’s that simple.

I actually have an entire thread already posted that explains how to properly screen a provider before booking her. Nowhere have I said to blindly book someone whose ad seems too good to be true. At some point, clients need to take responsibility for their own choices and safety. I’ve also said I’m not against reviews, as long as they’re done tastefully, respectfully, and not written like porn scripts. Some providers prefer a no-review policy, and that should be respected too. But there are plenty of ways to screen someone before seeing them. Here’s the link: https://www.lyla.ch/topic/214084-how-to-screen-an-indépendant/ The issue I raised is not about reviews. It’s about the disrespect of asking whether a woman is "worth it" just because she charges more or calls herself elite. This thread wasn’t a review of one person. It was a collective complaint targeting women who charge higher rates, an entire group of professionals being questioned for valuing themselves. As I said before: if you want to know if someone is "worth it," book her. Then leave a classy, respectful review. But dragging women publicly because their rates don’t match your expectations? That’s not feedback, it’s entitlement.

No one’s forcing you to read or comment, yet here you are, again. Funny how you say I’m missing the point, when the entire thread was about questioning whether a woman is ‘worth it’ if she charges more or calls herself elite. That’s what I addressed. Y’all are the ones who made it about me. If you want to stay on topic, great, do that. But stop projecting and trying to shift the narrative just because I won’t let the disrespect slide. And let’s be clear, I’m not here to change anyone’s mind. I already know some of you won’t get it. I’m here to help you expose yourselves. This thread has over 8,000 views and a lot of them are from providers. Trust me, I’m not wasting my time, I’m doing this community a favor. So please, continue. You’re doing a fantastic job of showing everyone exactly what kind of men we’re dealing with.