should we have more post restrictions...

[Guest gagagaga]

I have been on here a while now and something is bugging me a bit. In another thread, I made vague reference to receiving extras with no mention of a dancer's name or club. One Cerb member in particular chastised me (politely, sort of..lol) for "bragging about illegal activities", and implied that i have no class.

 

I have seen multiple threads here that refer to "mp's with a vast menu", "full service mp's", "full service strip clubs", "streetwalkers" and several other topics which imply illegal activities without specification of names, etc.

 

It is clear to me that my post caused some bad feelings on the part of the person who felt compelled to knock me down a notch. I can only assume that if this thoughtful, intelligent person was bothered enough to comment, then there are probably others out there that got pissed off and just didn't say anything.

 

I guess my question/comment is:

 

If Cerb is going to continue allowing these types of threads, than a person should be able to post without fear of verbally insulting reprisal. Isn't that one of the key's to Cerb??- nothing negative...or in other words, keep your NEGATIVE opinions to yourself.

 

If not, maybe any post with even so much as a hint of illegality should not be allowed at all.

 

am I way off here??

[Meg O'Ryan 266444]

Hun, hun, hun....never bring ANYTHING illegal to the table!!!!!!!!!!

[mrrnice2 157005]

Apologies. Withdrawing my comment for reasons of staying out of controversial legal areas.

[Guest gagagaga]

so Meg, are you saying that all those posts should be deleted and that any future posts that even hint at anything illegal should be barred? you weren't totally clear to me

[twoblues 258]

I think you shouldn't worry about what anyone says to/about you on an Internet forum.

 

Don't like it? Move along to another thread.

[Kimberly-Shea 28280]

future posts that even hint at anything illegal should be barred? you weren't totally clear to me

 

That's what it states in the rules/faq section:

 

Under the heading - "Do Not Discuss Anything Illegal"

 

http://www.cerb.ca/vbulletin/faq.php?faq=vb_faq#faq_discussillegal

 

 

 

.

[Old Dog 179138]

As the ohhhhh so lovely Kimberly and Meg have stated, we have rules and one of those rules is that we don't discuss things that are illegal.

 

CERB provides a great opportunity to express views, share stories and generally have fantastic discourse between business person and client. I really believe that this industry is a pioneer in open and frank dialogue - and this outlet, our beloved CERB, is one of the safe havens where you can develop and foster a real understanding of the concerns that are out there.

 

Sometimes we all make errors in judgment. We assume that people will be on board with our personal sense of humour, our moral code, and our sense of joy or outrage at world events. We push the boundaries of good taste, we make light of other's misery, we dismiss other's beliefs because they do not align with our own. That's life. That's reality. That's also the rationale for having rules.

 

The rules, let's face it... the rules are pretty damn liberal. We talk about stuff here that would make our moms blush. It's lively, it's serious, it's lighthearted, it's sexy... and it's all ours. The few rules that we have are there to protect our collective derrieres.

 

We may not always agree. We may regret what we have written. We may have to sit in a corner for a week or two (mea culpa, mea culpa, mea culpa...) for being too lively in our discourse or intercourse (hehehehe I said intercourse!!!) - but warts and all, you will NEVER find a better group of people with a sense of commonality and community than we have at CERB.

 

That's just one cents worth... I am saving my other penny for the champagne room ;)

[Meg O'Ryan 266444]

Tried to rep you old dog...woot woot!!

[castle 38816]

I'm a little confused. We're not supposed to discuss anything illegal and yet incall encounters with SP's are discussed regularly. And even after all these years I'm a little shady on the laws surrounding this hobby, but I was always under the impression that incall encounters were illegal as where outcalls are legal. Am I missing something?

[mod 135639]

Incalls can be completely legal. If a lady does not use the same place as a common place of prostitution it is completely legal. For example, if she rents a hotel room and see's one guy at the room then leaves it's legal so saying she is entertaining or does in-calls is legal. It is only illegal if she is using the same place as a common place of prostitution. Also in most cities unless she has high traffic, multiple ladies working from the same location, drugs, pimps or anything like that involved the law tends to look the other way as everyone knows it is safer for the ladies so we do allow incalls.

 

Cerb rules clearly state nothing illegal is to be discussed. The rules also say we DO NOT discuss streetwalkers here at all (If you do your post should be reported). We do not discuss FS at massage spa's (or even any extra's that could be considered a sexual act) and we do not discuss this happening in stripclubs either as your just going to get (1) the strip club in trouble and (2) possibly yourself as the police could ask the courts to order us to release your IP information if you admit openly here that you were involved in a illegal act. Now that has never happened but it could if you talk about illegal things so your very foolish to do this either way (I erase and warn anyone who does this as our members here will flag most illegal discussions to our attention).

[Megan'sTouch 23875]

I'm a little confused. We're not supposed to discuss anything illegal and yet incall encounters with SP's are discussed regularly. And even after all these years I'm a little shady on the laws surrounding this hobby, but I was always under the impression that incall encounters were illegal as where outcalls are legal. Am I missing something?

Illegal as in the letter of the law or illegal as in what is currently practiced in Ottawa? Currently, roughly 96% of charges for prostitution are "soliciting in public or within public view" which is what joeblow1969/gagagaga was talking about. Bawdy houses are not currently being prosecuted in Ottawa unless there are exceptional circumstances. The practice of the law is much more relevant than the letter of the law.