Brooklyn B 4601 - around for a while but no reviews?

[cptslow 0]

Has anybody ever seen Brooklyn B?

https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/nova-scotia/halifax_other_brooklyn_b_available_for_incalls-7682300

 

It seems she has been around for a while - but no reviews.

[69Handicap 1]

If you scroll down on her LL ad there is a link to some legit reviews of her here on Lyla.

Cheers!

[monogamishfun 13]

She's very pretty and has an amazing body (the pics are her). Perfectly safe encounter. Service left something to be desired, but if you want something basic and vanilla she's worth at least one visit.

[LadiesFirst 880]

11 minutes ago, monogamishfun said:

if you want something basic and vanilla she's worth at least one visit.

Sure her heart will melt over your kind words… empathy much?

[MikeyInHalifax 578]

Pretty sure she has a ton of reviews. She's 100% legit and has a great personality to match her fantastic appearance. Not one to miss

[spencer00 462]

x2 on what MikeyInHalifax said!

 

There are lots of reviews!

[cptslow 0]

5 minutes ago, spencer00 said:

x2 on what MikeyInHalifax said!

 

There are lots of reviews!

But where?

[spencer00 462]

 

 

https://www.theeroticreview.com/account_manager/viewReview.asp?ID=2748358

[cptslow 0]

16 minutes ago, spencer00 said:

 

 

https://www.theeroticreview.com/account_manager/viewReview.asp?ID=2748358

That's one review... and in the thread later on there is a mix up with another Brooklyn... so I wasn't really sure about it.

[Halifaxseeker 41]

She is beautiful and all the boxes check. But if I’m being honest she was unenthusiastic. It’s a huge turn off for me but maybe not for a lot of em. She was on her phone most of the time during the session and no eye contact what so ever. 

[cptslow 0]

22 hours ago, Halifaxseeker said:

She is beautiful and all the boxes check. But if I’m being honest she was unenthusiastic. It’s a huge turn off for me but maybe not for a lot of em. She was on her phone most of the time during the session and no eye contact what so ever. 

Thanks Halifaxseeker - totally agree. This is a no go - no matter how beautiful she is.

[MikeyInHalifax 578]

I think it's pretty evident that YMMV with this young lady. I personally had a great time. Others didn't.

 

She wasn't unenthusiastic w/me. Not on her phone. She was engaged and very vocal during our encounter. 

[LadiesFirst 880]

3 hours ago, monogamishfun said:

 

I guess my comment had as much empathy as Brooklyn had enthusiasm during our encounter.

Not trying to hurt anyone's feelings. Just trying to be objective about my experience.

If there is nothing nice to say, say nothing. Cumulative silence can be quite loud.

[Cjthomas 1630]

Apparently there needs to be more discussion concerning what ymmv actually means. Even repeat encounters with a  favourite regular provider can be lackluster. Lots of reasons for a lackluster session. Some of which can be attributed to something we the client did or didnt do. We should consider that before coming here to complain that a provider wasn’t as great as someone else found her to be. I also find it annoying when it’s assumed that because a provider hasn’t any reviews  or any recent reviews that we should be dubious of them. Not every provider wants to be reviewed and most established providers don’t need new ones to affirm their professionalism or legitimacy.  So many here have been hobbying and members for many years and yet continue to ignore the basics of this industry and common sense. 

[monogamishfun 13]

12 hours ago, LadiesFirst said:

If there is nothing nice to say, say nothing. Cumulative silence can be quite loud.

In my original comment, I provided feedback that the encounter was perfectly safe. Sometimes that has value to people who might be weary to visit. I guess next time I just won't respond.

 

8 minutes ago, Cjthomas said:

Apparently there needs to be more discussion concerning what ymmv actually means. Even repeat encounters with a  favourite regular provider can be lackluster. Lots of reasons for a lackluster session. Some of which can be attributed to something we the client did or didnt do. We should consider that before coming here to complain that a provider wasn’t as great as someone else found her to be. 

I think most here have a good understanding of YMMV. I didn't dispute anyone else's positive experiences with the provider.

[LadiesFirst 880]

24 minutes ago, Cjthomas said:

Apparently there needs to be more discussion concerning what ymmv actually means. Even repeat encounters with a  favourite regular provider can be lackluster. Lots of reasons for a lackluster session. Some of which can be attributed to something we the client did or didnt do. We should consider that before coming here to complain that a provider wasn’t as great as someone else found her to be. I also find it annoying when it’s assumed that because a provider hasn’t any reviews  or any recent reviews that we should be dubious of them. Not every provider wants to be reviewed and most established providers don’t need new ones to affirm their professionalism or legitimacy.  So many here have been hobbying and members for many years and yet continue to ignore the basics of this industry and common sense. 

Good points. 

Roughly stated, my napkin math looks something like this

Ymmv=a+b+c....+x+y+z