Brooklyn B 4601 - around for a while but no reviews?

[cptslow 0]

Has anybody ever seen Brooklyn B?

https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/nova-scotia/halifax_other_brooklyn_b_available_for_incalls-7682300

 

It seems she has been around for a while - but no reviews.

[69Handicap 1]

If you scroll down on her LL ad there is a link to some legit reviews of her here on Lyla.

Cheers!

[monogamishfun 14]

She's very pretty and has an amazing body (the pics are her). Perfectly safe encounter. Service left something to be desired, but if you want something basic and vanilla she's worth at least one visit.

[LadiesFirst 881]

11 minutes ago, monogamishfun said:

if you want something basic and vanilla she's worth at least one visit.

Sure her heart will melt over your kind words… empathy much?

[MikeyInHalifax 580]

Pretty sure she has a ton of reviews. She's 100% legit and has a great personality to match her fantastic appearance. Not one to miss

[spencer00 462]

x2 on what MikeyInHalifax said!

 

There are lots of reviews!

[cptslow 0]

5 minutes ago, spencer00 said:

x2 on what MikeyInHalifax said!

 

There are lots of reviews!

But where?

[spencer00 462]

 

 

https://www.theeroticreview.com/account_manager/viewReview.asp?ID=2748358

[cptslow 0]

16 minutes ago, spencer00 said:

 

 

https://www.theeroticreview.com/account_manager/viewReview.asp?ID=2748358

That's one review... and in the thread later on there is a mix up with another Brooklyn... so I wasn't really sure about it.

[Halifaxseeker 41]

She is beautiful and all the boxes check. But if I’m being honest she was unenthusiastic. It’s a huge turn off for me but maybe not for a lot of em. She was on her phone most of the time during the session and no eye contact what so ever. 

[cptslow 0]

22 hours ago, Halifaxseeker said:

She is beautiful and all the boxes check. But if I’m being honest she was unenthusiastic. It’s a huge turn off for me but maybe not for a lot of em. She was on her phone most of the time during the session and no eye contact what so ever. 

Thanks Halifaxseeker - totally agree. This is a no go - no matter how beautiful she is.

[MikeyInHalifax 580]

I think it's pretty evident that YMMV with this young lady. I personally had a great time. Others didn't.

 

She wasn't unenthusiastic w/me. Not on her phone. She was engaged and very vocal during our encounter. 

[LadiesFirst 881]

3 hours ago, monogamishfun said:

 

I guess my comment had as much empathy as Brooklyn had enthusiasm during our encounter.

Not trying to hurt anyone's feelings. Just trying to be objective about my experience.

If there is nothing nice to say, say nothing. Cumulative silence can be quite loud.

[Cjthomas 1631]

Apparently there needs to be more discussion concerning what ymmv actually means. Even repeat encounters with a  favourite regular provider can be lackluster. Lots of reasons for a lackluster session. Some of which can be attributed to something we the client did or didnt do. We should consider that before coming here to complain that a provider wasn’t as great as someone else found her to be. I also find it annoying when it’s assumed that because a provider hasn’t any reviews  or any recent reviews that we should be dubious of them. Not every provider wants to be reviewed and most established providers don’t need new ones to affirm their professionalism or legitimacy.  So many here have been hobbying and members for many years and yet continue to ignore the basics of this industry and common sense. 

[monogamishfun 14]

12 hours ago, LadiesFirst said:

If there is nothing nice to say, say nothing. Cumulative silence can be quite loud.

In my original comment, I provided feedback that the encounter was perfectly safe. Sometimes that has value to people who might be weary to visit. I guess next time I just won't respond.

 

8 minutes ago, Cjthomas said:

Apparently there needs to be more discussion concerning what ymmv actually means. Even repeat encounters with a  favourite regular provider can be lackluster. Lots of reasons for a lackluster session. Some of which can be attributed to something we the client did or didnt do. We should consider that before coming here to complain that a provider wasn’t as great as someone else found her to be. 

I think most here have a good understanding of YMMV. I didn't dispute anyone else's positive experiences with the provider.

[LadiesFirst 881]

24 minutes ago, Cjthomas said:

Apparently there needs to be more discussion concerning what ymmv actually means. Even repeat encounters with a  favourite regular provider can be lackluster. Lots of reasons for a lackluster session. Some of which can be attributed to something we the client did or didnt do. We should consider that before coming here to complain that a provider wasn’t as great as someone else found her to be. I also find it annoying when it’s assumed that because a provider hasn’t any reviews  or any recent reviews that we should be dubious of them. Not every provider wants to be reviewed and most established providers don’t need new ones to affirm their professionalism or legitimacy.  So many here have been hobbying and members for many years and yet continue to ignore the basics of this industry and common sense. 

Good points. 

Roughly stated, my napkin math looks something like this

Ymmv=a+b+c....+x+y+z

 

[Cjthomas 1631]

3 hours ago, monogamishfun said:

In my original comment, I provided feedback that the encounter was perfectly safe. Sometimes that has value to people who might be weary to visit. I guess next time I just won't respond.

 

I think most here have a good understanding of YMMV. I didn't dispute anyone else's positive experiences with the provider.

I can’t speak for most but after reading numerous posts which lean blame towards the provider when service is said to be lackluster  or vanilla, I’ll disagree that there is a general understanding of ymmv. What I take issue with is that making such comments can possibly cause a safe to see and real provider a detrimental loss in their business or reputation . All over something  as benign as incompatibility. Why not just move on? Dangerous people should be called out but people who are providing a service as advertised need not be. 

[MikeyInHalifax 580]

10 minutes ago, Cjthomas said:

I can’t speak for most but after reading numerous posts which lean blame towards the provider when service is said to be lackluster  or vanilla, I’ll disagree that there is a general understanding of ymmv. What I take issue with is that making such comments can possibly cause a safe to see and real provider a detrimental loss in their business or reputation . All over something  as benign as incompatibility. Why not just move on? Dangerous people should be called out but people who are providing a service as advertised need not be. 

This is why Lyla has a no negative review policy. Each encounter is different. Chemistry is real. You may be the one guy that has a bad experience and ruin the reputation of a provider who has had nothing but good experiences with other clients previously. It's one thing to discuss these instances privately among ourselves, but it's detrimental to everyone involved to publicly air these situations.

[Cjthomas 1631]

Mikey I agree with most of your reply. Although I have yet to understand the amount of talk that is shared among some of us. You”d think that some of us have nothing to do other than talk about the providers we visit. I will no longer share details about my visits and I don’t feel the need to discuss with anyone my feelings concerning any provider. I hope those I see offer me the same respect

[MikeyInHalifax 580]

33 minutes ago, Cjthomas said:

Mikey I agree with most of your reply. Although I have yet to understand the amount of talk that is shared among some of us. You”d think that some of us have nothing to do other than talk about the providers we visit. I will no longer share details about my visits and I don’t feel the need to discuss with anyone my feelings concerning any provider. I hope those I see offer me the same respect

LoL bro... I know exactly how you feel. Sometimes I think some of these new members think I'm Escort Google or something. The amount of messages I get asking about SP's is truly wild. 

 

I try to be helpful without being judgemental, and not sharing any specific details, but sometimes I get very frustrated as 99% of the things they're asking is easily found right here in the Discussions or Recommendations page. 

 

I will also admit to losing patience when they start to refer to SP's in a dehumanizing manner. I am in no way a white knight, but a little human decency goes a long way when your asking about intimate acts with another human being. I try to keep the conversation as business like as possible. I will admit I referred to one provider in unkind terms and have regretted it ever since.

 

The only reason I reply is to try and encourage a respectful attitude and safe practices. As much as possible anyway.