MoodyBlue

This was a response to NaughtyNatalie: Then you'll love Googling Sapiosexuality, but somehow I have a feeling you are already familiar with the term. ;) And this was my MAIN Comment on the thread. There is a common thread in all these comments and all are very accurate. Of course we all know that men especially are very visual and a woman's physical appearance seems to score higher for the average lay person out there. (Think Shallow Hal movie). HOWEVER, as I am quickly learning, some characteristics that make a woman extra sexy to me include, total honesty, open communication straight up front with nothing to hide. A woman who is passionate about her self and her identity. She makes you feel like she has known you and been in your life forever. This person is genuine, has intelligent and intimate conversations and laughs and is also a very patient teacher. She is literally on a passionate mission to make one feel special and meet needs that I might not even know I had, but she does! Attitude sums it up to a large extent. Women have many charms, the ones who are faking it or just doing it for the cash are a total turnoff (you can tell pretty quickly). On the other hand, a woman who is sexy is passionate about what they do and it comes across loud and clear as sexy to me. They are everything a man could dream of! Thank you sexy ladies, you have all my respect and then some. xo

Well, they made me switch from "Virgin" olive oil to "Coconut Oil" due to it's far superior health advantages for cooking. Having said that, what recommendations might people have for "edible" lotions and creams? (They can have very different applications of course). I mean, everybody's got to eat right? ;)

George Carlin (RIP) said it best "Elections are held to give voters the "Illusion" of control, you have no control. They own you, they own everything". They've already bought politicians, judges, all the mainstream media, police and down the chain it goes. After 45+ voting years if there is anything I've learned is that these guys (HISTORY PROVES & REPEATS THIS AGAIN & AGAIN"). 90% of the time, once in power they turn around and pull a 180 and all the promises made. Remember Obama's "Hope & Change"? The Conservatives in the past who got elected on a promise NOT to pass the much hated & protested GST as well as a promise of no new gas taxes (the 70s). Once IN, those were the first 2 promises they broke. As for Harper? He sold Canada out to his Corporate Masters and has de-regulated the hell out of all our protections and resource management. He has destroyed the Canada we once knew and loved. Today, Mr Trudeau promises to defend our rights and freedoms yet how many people remember or noticed that without his EXPLICIT backing of Harper's Bill C-51 Omnibus anti-terror bill, it would NOT have passed. This bill which basically gave us a Canadian version of the US NDAA and killed our Canadian Charter of Human Rights as the NDAA killed the US Constitution. Time to wake up and smell the coffee people. http://bit.ly/1QtsUlx Mr. Trudeau wants to maintain Canada's reputation as a peaceful, loving people and as such we will welcome Refugees. Meanwhile, we have people sleeping within short distance from Parliament Hill on the streets and through Ottawa's bitter winters. The priorities are all backwards. Maybe if instead of going overseas to bomb other countries and building a Spy Center to spy on its own Citizens and which (when operations are included) is a 4 BILLION dollar expense we could do so much good with that money. At least Trudeau's dad (who eventually screwed up with his multicultural stance) BUILT/FUNDED PUBLIC HOUSING year after year and fought for the poor to the extent he could. So now, while Canadians who were born here and who's parents and grandparents helped build and support these social safety net measures are now on 10 year+ waiting lists for public housing. (BEHIND new immigrants who get priority). (I speak from personal experience). Justin Trudeau should look back at his father's leadership when Canada was known worldwide, trusted and our military's mandate was to "KEEP THE PEACE!). They were Nobel peace prize winning peacekeepers (The infamous blue helmets). How did we ever slide into this mess? OK, Trudeau, the ball is in your court now, EVERYONE wanted Harper the little Dictator out. He sold our country out and we just became puppets of US aggressive policy. So Justin, I really look forward to what you will reverse, change, improve. I remain unconvinced. Prove me wrong please! I'm agnostic, but on this, I will pray to God for a miracle. Much LOVE to everyone on this little blue planet. We are all brothers and sisters and only WE have the power of numbers. They keep us in fear and promote hate to keep us divided and fighting each other. "United we stand, divided we fall" If we can ever agree on anything to change this world for the better, they fear our numbers!. You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. "Imagine" by John Lenon "BE the change you want to see."~Gandhi Namaste.

Great tips, thanks for all this useful info. I've been "burned" several times, especially before I discovered Lyla.com (Cerb back then). So I think it's very revealing just how extensive these fraudsters are who are literally stealing or extorting your hard earned money. You also have to be careful about "outcalls" to your residence. I once had my "date" show up and let's just say, she was "scary". In most of these cases, including incalls to bad areas, there will be "muscle" lurking in the background. If you start to complain, they will confront you for a minimum chunk of change and also of course the cost of transportation. Talk about a scam. The second part of this thread taught me something new and very practical as well. When someone (SP) PMs me asking to know more about me, I tend to provide TMI (too much info). I've been known to ramble. I had always THOUGHT that most SPs DID NOT LIKE OR OFTEN HAVE TIME FOR CALLS. But really, it makes so much sense and is so much more efficient. Talking reveals much more and as we know, texting is known to sometimes lose something in translation. (Can be easy to misinterpret a comment or emotion). Thanks for this thread, too many of us have been "used" this way. It's great to see the spotlight is being turned on these all too often "hidden" ripoff schemes. Your advice is invaluable.

I was rather surprised at the number of SPs and clients who prefer or take 30 min. sessions. I had no idea that many would prefer a "quickie". Personally, I would probably compromise. Someone mentioned 45 minutes, I don't see too many ads for 45 min sessions but that and this topic have me completely rethinking how I meet someone new. Because I'm not a young pup anymore, 30 minutes just might not be enough for me. LOL The idea of 45 minutes sounds like a great way to (I hate to use this term) "test drive" the chemistry or possible hostility? Had I been doing this as a rule, it would already saved me grief and money as I've discovered recently. I rate this thread 5 stars because for me, it will literally change how I do things. I can't afford to meet with ladies on frequent basis BUT I guess that as a relatively inexperienced "noob" I have learned an INVALUABLE (screening) TIP here. The biggest thing is that this will literally change my philosophy and way of doing business when meeting new SPs. You see, all this time, I always thought that 90 minute sessions would be preferable with the thinking that not having to watch the clock and the extra time would allow extra time to chat before and after. Oddly, it never really occurred to me that "What if?" once I got there, it could be like icewater. So, no more 90 minute 1st time meets. I think 45mins (possibly an hour would be ideal in my case). Without mentioning any names I met someone new and booked 90 minutes 3 times. Everything "clicked" and I was happy on the first meet. I was SOLD/HOOKED on this lady. HOWEVER, AS I LEARNED, YOU STILL HAVE TO BE CAREFUL BECAUSE YOUR NEXT MEETING OR TWO COULD FOR SOME REASON TURN OUT TO BE DISASTERS. Let's just say that it was a COSTLY LESSON fore me and I'm now on the side of shorter initial meetings, even 2 or 3 before I would commit to 90 minutes everytime. So, this thread has been a real "eye opener" for me. Thank You for starting this thread and the very good comments.

Thanks ottawaadventurer! Great group. Love it. Too many ladies think it's all about size. (No, no, not the guy's). This is one case where smaller is better. Got to confess, tiny titties often come with good sized raised nipples. I just find it all so "titilating". Thanks for this group and its treats. ;)

Finest collection of leg pics I've seen. Thanks Cato!! btw~As these and other pic will attest women have all the "real" power. We are putty in their hands and ????? Haha ;)

OMG THANK YOU! THIS WILL PROBABLY BE MY FAVOURITE GROUP. Always been a leg man, even remember one particular girl in late high school who delighted in wearing the skimpiest min-skirt combined with skin coloured panty hose. Of course our desks consisted of a table top, a flat wooden seat and wire mesh at bottom for books etc.. Suffice to say that she had nowhere to hide and I believe she was proud of her looks. Probably enjoyed driving both the guys ans our teacher to "distraction". That I can still remember her and even her name decades later says a lot. That is when I realized that legs are my favourite turn on, followed by ass, yes even ahead of boobies. (I don't mind cleavage of course). LOL Think I'll be dropping by regularly. :)

A big thank you momma's boy for providing this group and all that eye candy. Damn, those pics are hot and some of those ladies look like they mean business. :) Having trouble with some of the "click to open" pics. Tried turning off all defences on my browser, no help. I won't give up. :/

Thank you for sharing, I love them all but your pic with the "5 inch clear platform stretchy black PVC Pleaser boots" (the name says it all). Actually as part of the outfit, I would be melted butter in your presence.;)

Love high boots, thigh highs (even socks or panty hose in a thigh high style). I don't have a foot fetish per se but thigh high boots sometimes called "��� Fxx me boots is a testament to the effect they have on men. Oh and if you're into Domination, I'm all yours. ;)

These rules and conditions leave me dazed and confused to be perfectly honest. I need advice on the correct procedure for reporting someone for fraud, theft, misrepresentation. But obviously I cannot report it here as no negative posts are allowed. Not to mention the burden of proof. So, if something like this happens where you have been victimized badly, how can a client report it. I note with great interest that "Ladies - We have a private SP ONLY area for you to post bad date info. Contact the MOD for access So, why can there not be either something similar for clients? Obviously repeated reports of the same problem by multiple clients would make you want to consider options or at least raise your awareness. The reason I raise this issue is that I recently had a very negative experience which cost me a lot of money, emotional hurt to name but a few. It isn't the first time that "Honesty in Advertising" was sorely lacking. As a result of my experience, I reached out to a few friends and discovered that many of them had been "burned" badly either through failure to deliver services, misrepresentation or outright theft or fraud. I suspect there may be hundreds if not 1,000 or more clients who have suffered loss, been victims and due to their situation or embarrassment, they never reported it. Perhaps the ideal situation would be for a sticky or link where clients can report losses, embarrassment, being cheated directly to a specific MOD? This way, everything would remain anonymous and only the MOD in charge would gather this data. Then, if some people needed to be banned or disciplined in any way, they would no longer appear on Lyla as they continue to spread false advertising. This is a minority, but they are costing clients a lot of money, creating stress, emotional upset etc... We need some way for clients to receive protection from such scams. Only being able to make positive Recommendations "handcuffs" the client.