Jump to content

freestyleswimmer

General Member
  • Content Count

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by freestyleswimmer

  1. They should only provide seats for the audience................ (Just kidding :roll: )
  2. Wow, wow, 2006............................. and now History has been made. Cat is in Ottawa....................... or ???????????????? Hi Cat.! :-D
  3. Unfortunately, for the SPs that is, with today's proliferation of anonymous, generic email accounts (@gmail @yahoo @hotmail etc........) anyone can obtain as many fake identities as they want. I am even of two minds about actually posting this post that I'm writing right now (afraid I might be giving someone, somewhere, a solution as to how he (usually a 'he') can go "under cover" -NO pun intended- and get several IDs). However since "criminals" will always have a criminal mind-set and I'm not revealing the secrets of the A-bomb formula, Here Go my 0.01$ + 0.01$ I say that this is unfortunate, because no matter how well-intentioned and protective the Mods are, they cannot assume that [email protected] is the same person as [email protected] . This can only be revealed after a while (circumstancial evidence at best) when the same spelling mistakes, the same idiosyncracies -in writing- same styles, same cadences start showing up to the point where a Mod can say with a 90% chance of being right, "abc@ is the same person as xyz@" An SP's (non-public) blacklist is (apart from carrying concealed handguns ---which won't help during later stages of the "visit" when clothes are off--- or being an expert black belt in Karate, Judo, Jiu-Jitsu or what have you) is one way the "ladies" can protect or "warn" each other (and themselves). Maybe, a partial solution, to give possibly innocent guys in cases of mistaken identities and similarities in handles a chance at proving their innocence, is to have the Mod PM those whose names are on such blacklists and (kind of) hold an Internet hearing, amongst the three of them, Poster, Postee and Mod and let each present their side of the story and make a final judgment call. And in cases of repeat "listings" of the same handle, this fact could be an influencing factor. (I know that Mod is one busy person without having to add this additional role, but .......... who else has the Power?) Once a blacklist inductee is outed, there could be a short "termination list" publically posted by Mods and a period where possible "character witnesses for the defence" could come forward to the Mod (or by PM to the Mod) and attest that "A" is no way like the "a" that they all know and like. Some one could come forward and say, "Hey, fss is not FSS." We can see how this could happen. I am affectionately (I hope, affectionately) being called (nicknamed) FSS. And I wouldn't want to be banned because of FuriousSexSadist's actions. I know that this is no joking matter, but when I put in a light touch, to me, and to those who know me, this shows that I care profoundly about the subject. I guess all of you readers, hobbyists and SPs alike (include Mod) know what I mean. However, I would caution that it will always be safer to err on the side of protecting the SPs. This migh save someone's life, livelihood or avoid her ending up in an Emergency Room. Error against an innocent postee, on the other hand, although a miscarriage of justice, will just prevent a certain gentleman from getting "dates" on this board. So what? I know that the SPs on this board are precious gems, but there are other jewellers in town (albeit of less carats.) I'm now ready to start dodging sniper fire (if not AK47 volleys). There are no appropriate smileys for a subject about peoples' safety, wellbeing and lives.
  4. Cat, as always you are the voice of reason (and of other things as well, and you're the only one who can use my handle's acronym without making it sound like it belongs on the FAQ). I didn't want to start getting into an argument. I find that explaining a joke makes things worse. Back to the subject at hand: Regarding taking a girl (or lady) shopping: If a lady is to model for me from where I take her shopping, it'll always be a perfume store (or body lotion..............). Need I add, modelling nothing else but the recent acquisition? :D
  5. Aren't we all glad to learn that all kinds of crime have been eliminated in Ottawa so that the Police can finally devote all their man(and girl)power to fight the evil, obscene deeds committed by consenting adults (in private). Now, finally, we know that there are no drugs anywhere within the NCC region, that street gangs have all been sent to Devil's Island (or the Chateau d'If), that nobody in any Ministry (even DND) embezzles millions, that every single driver obeys all the traffic laws, by-laws, signs and indicators, that rape, murder, theft, burglaries, jaywalking, arson and (Yes, even) graffitti have been eradicated and that graft and corruption in HIGH places are a thing of the past. That child molesters are all in the prisons' general populations; (S.O.S. I'm running out of crimes here.............. but since they're all now vague and distant memories; let's all applaud the valiant efforts of our men (and women) in black. (I believe it is black. Right?)
  6. Gifts should always be from you, not from some other guy(?) named Danier................ Duh!!!!!!!!!! Otherwise it'd be too easy. I could always tell the lady, "Oh! BTW, your gift is not in this envelope; it'll be coming from Danier.........."
  7. Seems to me like you're trying to recruit here (and maybe end up a-la-Hugh-Heffner if you're lucky). Just my (Hey Mod, we need more smileys and icons -for change, like 2 cents' worth)
  8. Not always "harder to find". I did. And it was North of Latitude 45? 21' N. Actually it was at 45? 22' N -(minus) one and a half blocks South.
  9. Wow. Your first encounter and you get to her "g"! Just kidding. Too good an e-error (wrong button pressed) to pass up. Just FYI, you can always "edit" your own posts even after posting. But I'm glad you left this is one "as is/as was"................
  10. "Some" arenas might frown upon that activity. (Sorry. Had to do some editing without snipping or cutting too much off.) I'd love 2 meet u 2 but, following your advice, I might not offer any freebies but then a "gentleman" should never accept money from a lady. Regards, Oooooooooooopps.......... almost signed the post. If we can't laugh at ourselves, might as well use that straight razor and go for a full decapitation.
  11. Oh! I did have one of those back in 1972, the afternoon of my wedding night. Since it was a "facial" I had no fear then of being emasculated. My ex took care of that for the following 20 years or so. :( So might I (but I'll have to be very careful whenever I'm in the Mall. There's a Barbershop there and I might embarrass myself publicly if they're stropping a razor as I walk by.)
  12. I guess I forgot the smileys (How many am I allowed on this Forum?) Smile-smile, wink-wink. ;):D:) I just got told off (only four images).
  13. As long as no straight razors are involved. One slip and it's "to p or not to p".
  14. I am an ex-(very heavy) smoker. (BTW "heavy" refers to smoking not to my effect on a scale.) Quit six years ago. I am not self-righteous (when it comes to the smoking of others) nor am I one of those reformed born-again crusading anti-smokers. (Nor do I prosecute smokers only to be found out "smoking" on the sly and having spent $80,000 on smoking). That said, as long as the lady has taken very good care that the place doesn't reek (or even hint) of smoke-smell and that her own personal (oral) hygiene is impeccable, then I don't really care. Let me correct that: I do care and appreciate the fact that she has gone through the trouble to mask any lingering hints of smoke smell.
  15. And for all those (no specific personalities targeted) who thought I was not (kidding, that is) and that my postwasa veiled threat :rolleyes: writtenUSING newspaper clippings, I..........w.a.s...........k.i.d.d.i.n.g and NikkiStarr not only understood that I was kidding but she said it.
  16. I never said "freebie" singular; it was plural ;) Yes technically it was the "Mod" who first welcomed you. (He always does that; stealing our thunder.) Kidding aside, my (and many others', I daresay) suggestion would be to give such great service to your first visitors that they'll post glowing reviews (while they're still smiling). That, will eventually snowball to the point where Forumites will be whining about how they can't get hold of you or get a rendez-vous this decade. Good luck and may Erox smile down upon you. (I had to put an "x" there because that particular Deity's name is a no-no.)
  17. Jokes seems to be a popular topic in several Fora. "A sense of humour" as a title is not very indicative as the expression is bound to crop up (along with other things) on a lot of boards. How about renaming it to "Jokes". Therefore a search for a girl/lady/woman/SP/MP with "a Sense of humour" might point to different threads (and Parliament Hill would certainly not be one for MPs. As clients, maybe; as people with a sense of humour, no. They do laugh all the way to their retirement banks and they're great at scr$%^ing us). But I digress.
  18. The Birds and The Bees "John", sais Susan. "Our son Peter is soon turning 15. I think it's time you told him about the birds and the bees." "Do you really think I ought to? Why should I?" "Well you're his Dad and and a son and his Dad need to have that conversation." "Ok, then." He hollered, "Pete, come here. There's something I need to talk to you about." "Yes, Dad", said Pete. "Remember last Summer when the whole family was down in Spain's Costa del Sol for our Summer vacation?" "Yes." "And, do you remember when you and I were down at the Torremolinos beach and we met those two gorgeous Swedish lady tourists?" "Yeah, Dad." "And remember, we took them behind the beach-house and what we did with them?" "Sure do, Dad." "Well, Son, I guess that's what the birds and the bees do too."
  19. 4a.I asked my wife where she wanted to go for our anniversary. "Somewhere expensive," She said. So I took her to a gas station.
  20. Dear Pentho..............Oops. Dear Cerb Extremely:D Chemistry? All about which in my first post (the original review/recommendation that started this thread). Pretty accurate considering that hers are some of few photos (of SP or escorts) that show a face albeit hidden by her hair. I prefer that to a PhotoShop swirl or blur. Reality surpassed (my) expectations (but that's my own preference). I like some faces; I love some faces and I hate some runway models' or Hollywood Stars' or Stars' faces. As to services, I don't recall seeing any "menus" in her ads. In our emails and subsequent telephone conversations, I did not ask about any Menus or "Soupe du Jour" or specifics. (I like the Discovery Channel, BTW). Spotless (hotel accommodation) located at QWERTY (*&%&^........ New bar of soap in the shower. Fresh towels. Freshly made bed. Long queue at................ Sorry, that was much earlier at the Supermarket. Too many people in the showers..... Ooops that was at my pool earlier. not applicable Dear Penhouse letters. Aah! "Youth. What a wonderful thing!. Pity that it's wasted on the young". Not mine; some old geezer Philosopher -George Bernard Shaw, my memory's not altogether gone- said that.) I prefer to write poetry over fiction.
  21. Hey LoneSkater Quoting her, she said: I don't have a DO NOT REVIEW, I prefer the acronym DNRD, DO NOT REVEAL DETAILS. In other words, and I was careful to read exactly what she wrote and what she requested or didn't, she does not have a DNR policy but she prefers the acronym DNRD (and then went on to decode the acronym.) She did not say that her policy was DNRD. If you feel that I was unjustly attacking you, please accept my humblest apologies.
  22. For everyone's info, she, Cat, never asked me or told me what to reveal and what not to, not even in the most general terms. When I posted my review I never asked her if she had "impositions" or restrictions regarding details or any other pertinent (or not) info. I imposed those restrictions on myself, not wanting my review to sound like a "Dear Hustler, Dear Playboy or Dear Penthouse" letter. There are quite a lot of reviews or recommendations that smack of self-bragging more than they relate to stating a lady's PLUSES or charms or a visitor's impressions or memories (some of us may be candidates for Alzheimer's). Details of any encounter, IMHO, relate much more to the YMMV category than to anything else. I don't believe so. I give very little credence -or weight- to those who describe their encounter in such minute details that I usually expect their next sentence to be, "Not only did she say I was the largest and best she ever had, but she insisted that I take my money back." And before any Forumite starts asking for my scalp, I do not mean any "ad hominem" attacks aimed at anyone in particular on this (or other similar) forums(s). Let me reiterate (again and, Yes, I know that "reiterate again" is overkill) that Cat never imposed or asked for any kind of restrictions. Did you ever stop to consider that maybe those restrictions that I imposed on myself by not giving details, were really meant to salve my own ego? Maybe she laughed at me (she didn't or she hid it very well, that I saw, anyway) and I didn't want to shame myself in this Forum. Then don't take my word for anything I've said. I don't take anyone else's (not for 101% granted, anyway). By the same token, are we supposed to take the word of some who described their encounters in great detail and whose performances were -by their own accounts- GR8, just because they wrote in great details? I know you were on a roll writing your Point Of View (i.e., that Cat imposed restrictions on details), but ............... SHE Never Requested That I Restrict Details. I Did That All By My Self. Then blame me (and her, only as far as she agreed with how I acted --- or wrote).
×
×
  • Create New...