Sydneymale54out

anyone try her yet?

interested here too If I was in Halifax I would definitely try her

Had her years ago No GFE kinda hustles ya

I dont deposit EVER no matter how good the pics look period

So just for further reference - which SP was this? PM if you dont wanna post here

Exactly

Harboursmoke has obviously had the same experiences Ive had. The obvious positives are : less traffic on them, and Ill say it because Ive tried both. The SBs are far prettier with better bodies and by my experience far better skills with less hustling. The negative is you will invest more effort into finding the ones you wanna stick with. I do have some favorite SP's also. Lets just say there is a huge difference between an SP that can't go hard for long because she has had 10 before you that day, and a regular girl who makes an arrangement to meet and play in the evening after a work day at a regular job

Got it - just looking for a good SP in Sydney

Anyone try her? https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/nova-scotia/cape_breton_incalls_in_sydney_now_the_real_gfe_pse_dfk_daty_69-8353163

https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/nova-scotia/cape_breton_i_m_discreet_and_matured_escort_massage_provider-8672551 anybody? Ive made contact but Im skeptical I did ask her to send a selfie with er winking and she did right away says shes actually 4 foot 9

fake pics

Funny thing I have to say about that Im always concerned about this , even when I try the sugar baby sites. This one time I had this very sophisticated lady coming to my hotel. I was a little concerned so I tell her"Ill know you arent a cop if you go totally topless the minute after you enter the hotel. So she comes in and bang --- totally naked in a few seconds. She has been a regular now for years. I honestly think this is the only test even by pics or vids

We wont find out on here unless its PM

I would liketo know also

https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/nova-scotia/halifax_hosting_now_halifax_dfk_gfe_pse_dt_cob_msog_4_11_tiny-7948483?source=list