Brad

I suspect generally speaking many ladies willing would ask to review the video first or have other conditions. But to your question, I can't say with certainty it's a service she's open to but you may want to try Amelia Fox.

(Natalia Grey if anyone is curious)

Johnny, I looked back at your earlier posts too, and I think part of the difficulty with them is it doesn't come across like you've clearly stated in prior communication your intention to proceed with certain activities. You say things such as letting a lady know that you "like to please", "I state before that I enjoy it", and "I never state it has to happen". I'm not sure that's the same as asking if an activity is allowed. And phrased like that, I don't think the onus is on the lady to say it isn't or assume you have an agreement. Especially since clearly many MA's think it not part of their profile. Can you see how MA's--who have chosen specifically to offer an MA experience--may rightfully assume they don't have to proactively say No? That implying you like something and not getting a No is not the same as getting a Yes? Based on what people are saying, some MA's may indeed be open to discussing/allowing more. But clearly many do not and view such activities as outside their role. If indeed the line is blurred, is it not that much more important to be certain beforehand rather than potentially misread the situation? I think the issue here is you believe you have asked permission and been given consent, but that is not clear. Even in your own words it sounded like you thought it was, at best, implied. Comments like "if a lady leads me to it...", and "I've always taken it as an invitation especially if I told her I like it..." or "There have been times when the lady said during the booking 'no' so I wouldn't even dream of tempting my luck". Can you see how that comes across as not having clear consent or prior agreement, for otherwise how would it ever be "tempting your luck?" Why need to wonder if it was an invitation? How would it ever "backfire?" Maybe this is not how you meant it. Maybe it was a poor choice of words. But phrased the way you did it's easy to see how it reads as pushing boundaries and not "false advertisement".

.

Caterina, the spirit of your post is very well said and your points absolutely valid, but in Lycrathong's defense I don't think he personally argued or even meant to imply a woman's absolute right to her body or her restrictions should be compromised for the sake of business. There seemed to be a number of conversations going on, and I believe he was responding to a couple sentences in one specific post. Whether that poster meant to imply enjoyment played no part and it is only about the money I don't want to theorize about, as I don't mean to distract things from what is a worthwhile conversation. There is a very important discussion happening here, but I think some comments and posters are perhaps getting crossed, and to be fair to Lycrathrong I don't think it was any of his posts that implied doing anything without prior and explicit consent. More generally: This thread started with one quarry and evolved into something more. I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing, as there are issues ladies face on a daily basis that--as much as us guys may wish to think otherwise--we can be blind to. When so many people speak up about an issue it's worth taking a step back from what your gut response might be and try to listen to the intent of the argument and the experiences being shared. As hard as it can be not to feel defensive or attacked, one can try to understand the frustration women are feeling and rightfully expressing. Self reflection and consideration of these kind of issues is important, especially for those of us that take part in this. Hopefully we can keep listening to each other with empathy, to really hear and try to appreciate the experiences and frustration being shared. And to do better.

Starts with texts. If I get something flirty or extra personalized it tells me the time is going to be special and just makes the lead up more exciting (presumably after a time is officially booked or it's a regular...I realize it's not something one could do with every random inquiry). A hug and kiss at the beginning. Again, makes a lovely start and connection. What really can get me going is if the lady makes a request. What I mean is if she's clearly enjoying and as into the time as I am that she's feeling her own needs and wants them satisfied. I mean, who doesn't get a rush out of feeling like you're pleasing? While I'm not going to complain about being pampered, I'll take a session that feels more mutual any day...maybe twice a day.

That really did make me laugh out loud. Great line! :)

Xenia Shelkovskaya (thought it was the actual actress when I first saw the pic!)

I always do a short greeting/salutation. But I'm also mindful of a lady's time so try not to go on too much before setting up a date. I figure once she knows I'm not a time waster she may be more willing to chat. I can be pretty forgiving of abbreviations or spelling mistakes. But I do like replies that indicate someone affectionate and personable.

She does seem to be headed back to Nova Scotia Nov 7th at least: http://halifax.backpage.ca/FemaleEscorts/nadia-qtx-autumns-magic-sydney-november-7-8-halifax-9-11/2778003

Hey TemptedMonk, here's the original poll: http://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=193435&highlight=poll I think it's still worthwhile voting in your poll, but figured I'd post this in case anyone wanted to compare and see if the demographics have changed at all.