YFL Elite

[Almostoldguy 48]

I personally find it very disrespectful to rate anybody, men or women. In my opinion this form should only be used to warn of scams, bait and switch, or of danger situations. 

I have had a few bad life experiences with very reputable ladies. Unfortunately that was mostly my fault for being trusting and getting to close. But that is to be kept personal and not talked about on a forum.

I backed away for a bit and realized that there are some really nice people that I missed seeing. So why punish myself for a few bad apples. I really do miss the friendships. It appears it was one sided. Oh well live, learn and move on. 

That's my 2 cents worth. I'm sure I will be rated for having an opinion;(

[dbhalifax 14]

Sadly it seems from their page that they currently have nobody scheduled to come to Halifax.

[Reddog2402 2229]

It may have something to do with with hotel availability.  There are very few vacancies, and what is available is $300/night or more.  

[Coco1 74]

Yes I can't see YFL turning their back on Halifax. I am sure the gals do pretty well here. But summer hotel rates have gotten crazy here. They may scale back visits until prices drop in the fall. 

1 hour ago, Reddog2402 said:

It may have something to do with with hotel availability.  There are very few vacancies, and what is available is $300/night or more.  

 

[RobertDion 120]

That might be it, because "Halifax being too fancy" can't be a thing.

[AdamSandler 236]

Looks like Anna is no longer coming which is too bad. 

[dbhalifax 14]

It seems that the truly delightful Jasmine will be here instead:

 

[BenDover 297]

53 minutes ago, AdamSandler said:

Looks like Anna is no longer coming which is too bad. 

yes i was actually going to book her 

[RobertDion 120]

Has the Halifax area been cancelled? 😅 We're only a couple hours from Moncton, strange they can't go that extra mile

[TrackMan265 24]

55 minutes ago, BenDover said:

yes i was actually going to book her 

Same. But I don't do prebooks myself as my availability flutuates. So I couldn't be considered a reliable booking I guess.

[TonyK 189]

On 6/30/2025 at 10:21 PM, Pamela Luscious said:

You're still contradicting yourself, you’re literally asking, “Why pay the elite rate instead of the regular rate?” That’s the woman’s choice. No one is being shackled or forced into a category. She decides what to charge, and that’s it.

 

What you’re implying is: why pay more if you can get the same for less? And yes, that is dehumanizing. These are not factory-line products. Each woman has her own energy, her own personality, her own preferences. You’re not going to have chemistry with every single person, and you’re certainly not going to get the same experience with every provider, even if they offer a similar service label.

 

Two providers may both offer GFE, but one might be soft-spoken and nurturing, while another is bold and flirty. That difference alone can completely change the experience, because the service is rendered by a human being, not a template.

 

And no, you're not experiencing the service “through the eyes of hobbyists.” You’re experiencing your own booking, with your own expectations, preferences, and connection. Asking hobbyists if someone is “worth it” based on a label makes zero sense, because chemistry, connection, and enjoyment are all subjective. You want to know if she is worth it to you? Book her. That’s how this works.

 

You asked, “Why are they classified into two categories?” again, that’s their choice. Some ladies charge more because they want exclusivity, fewer clients, and longer dates. Others may charge less and prefer shorter dates or more volume. Both are valid. That’s a business model, not a value judgment.

 

Same with agencies, some women prefer to manage everything themselves, others would rather let someone else handle screening, marketing, and logistics so they can focus on their clients. It’s a personal business decision.

 

And finally, stop crying about your “right to ask questions.” You do have that right. And I have every right to challenge what you're saying if I believe it's rooted in a problematic mindset. You don’t get to post on a public forum and then get upset when someone disagrees with you. That’s how discussions work.

 

I don’t need to work for an agency to have an opinion when men start talking about whether women who charge more are “worth it.” You either book her, experience what she offers, and leave a review, or don’t book and move on. But constantly questioning why someone charges more, or calling the “elite” label into doubt like it’s a scam, is not curiosity, it’s entitlement. If it’s not for you, move on. Simple.

 

You keep putting your words in my mouth (which btw if you haven't noticed, is disrespectful by itself). I have never questioned a woman's choice. Any woman can charge whatever they want to. But same way, I can ask my questions as long as YFL has not clearly defined what the difference is. I am paying for the service. Not you. 

 

So what? I care about what experience I am getting if I pay more. Wotz wrong in that? Yes experience might differ but I cannot see every single person to determine which experience I like better. So I ask fellow hobbyists. Who are you to judge whether I need to experience with my own eyes and not rely on other hobbyists? This is a platform where everyone can share their experience. I am person who is okay with making a decision based on that. It's my right, my choice, my decision. 

 

You said it's a 'business model'. And for your kind information, anybody who pays to a business has the right to understand whether its worth it. I am glad that you called this out as a business and not a service. So that makes my statement and question so valid. Isn't it?

 

You have every right to challenge. Who questioned that? If anyone is crying it's you since you misunderstood my whole point. Yes this is a public forum and I have every right to post the same way you consider you have every right to challenge. It's a two way street so no point in getting offended.

 

I never said YFL is a scam, in fact I am one of their regulars. Again, don't put your words in my mouth. Constantly questioning? Can you show me another post of mine on same topic? You are just raising some false accusations to put me in a bad spot. Or maybe YFL? If I may borrow your words, this is after all a 'BUSINESS' right?

[Pamela Luscious 172]

I’ve already explained it clearly. I’m not going to repeat myself for the fourth time. Stop saying I’m putting words in your mouth when everyone here can literally read what you wrote. That tactic doesn’t work.

 

At this point, it’s not a lack of explanation, it’s a lack of understanding. I can explain it to you, but I can’t make you understand it. And I’m not going to waste more energy trying.

 

You’ve told on yourself, and that’s on you for exposing yourself publicly.

 

“I’m paying for a service, not you” tells me everything I need to know. That one sentence proves exactly the point I’ve been making this entire time.

 

You don’t see the provider as a person offering an experience. You see her as a product you pay for, which is exactly why your question came across as dehumanizing from the start. You can say you “respect women’s choices” all you want, but the language you keep using contradicts that completely.

 

[TonyK 189]

2 hours ago, Pamela Luscious said:

I’ve already explained it clearly. I’m not going to repeat myself for the fourth time. Stop saying I’m putting words in your mouth when everyone here can literally read what you wrote. That tactic doesn’t work.

 

At this point, it’s not a lack of explanation, it’s a lack of understanding. I can explain it to you, but I can’t make you understand it. And I’m not going to waste more energy trying.

 

You’ve told on yourself, and that’s on you for exposing yourself publicly.

 

“I’m paying for a service, not you” tells me everything I need to know. That one sentence proves exactly the point I’ve been making this entire time.

 

You don’t see the provider as a person offering an experience. You see her as a product you pay for, which is exactly why your question came across as dehumanizing from the start. You can say you “respect women’s choices” all you want, but the language you keep using contradicts that completely.

 

Lol! What you said is true. Its lack of understanding. But it's you who doesn't understand because you can think only from your point of view. It was you who got exposed when you said it's a 'business' model. If it's a business, then I am the customer and I have every right to ask. And you are right. I am the one paying for the service. Not you. If that offends you, I can't help.

[Pamela Luscious 172]

29 minutes ago, TonyK said:

Lol! What you said is true. Its lack of understanding. But it's you who doesn't understand because you can think only from your point of view. It was you who got exposed when you said it's a 'business' model. If it's a business, then I am the customer and I have every right to ask. And you are right. I am the one paying for the service. Not you. If that offends you, I can't help.

This isn’t Walmart. The customer isn’t always right.

 

Obviously it’s a business, anything generating revenue and paying taxes operates under a business model. That doesn’t mean you get to treat people like products or assume every experience should be “worth it” by your standards.

 

Common sense really isn’t that common, clearly.