YFL Elite

[Almostoldguy 48]

I personally find it very disrespectful to rate anybody, men or women. In my opinion this form should only be used to warn of scams, bait and switch, or of danger situations. 

I have had a few bad life experiences with very reputable ladies. Unfortunately that was mostly my fault for being trusting and getting to close. But that is to be kept personal and not talked about on a forum.

I backed away for a bit and realized that there are some really nice people that I missed seeing. So why punish myself for a few bad apples. I really do miss the friendships. It appears it was one sided. Oh well live, learn and move on. 

That's my 2 cents worth. I'm sure I will be rated for having an opinion;(

[dbhalifax 14]

Sadly it seems from their page that they currently have nobody scheduled to come to Halifax.

[Reddog2402 2229]

It may have something to do with with hotel availability.  There are very few vacancies, and what is available is $300/night or more.  

[Coco1 82]

Yes I can't see YFL turning their back on Halifax. I am sure the gals do pretty well here. But summer hotel rates have gotten crazy here. They may scale back visits until prices drop in the fall. 

1 hour ago, Reddog2402 said:

It may have something to do with with hotel availability.  There are very few vacancies, and what is available is $300/night or more.  

 

[RobertDion 122]

That might be it, because "Halifax being too fancy" can't be a thing.

[AdamSandler 237]

Looks like Anna is no longer coming which is too bad. 

[dbhalifax 14]

It seems that the truly delightful Jasmine will be here instead:

 

[BenDover 299]

53 minutes ago, AdamSandler said:

Looks like Anna is no longer coming which is too bad. 

yes i was actually going to book her 

[RobertDion 122]

Has the Halifax area been cancelled? 😅 We're only a couple hours from Moncton, strange they can't go that extra mile

[TrackMan265 26]

55 minutes ago, BenDover said:

yes i was actually going to book her 

Same. But I don't do prebooks myself as my availability flutuates. So I couldn't be considered a reliable booking I guess.

[TonyK 192]

On 6/30/2025 at 10:21 PM, Pamela Luscious said:

You're still contradicting yourself, you’re literally asking, “Why pay the elite rate instead of the regular rate?” That’s the woman’s choice. No one is being shackled or forced into a category. She decides what to charge, and that’s it.

 

What you’re implying is: why pay more if you can get the same for less? And yes, that is dehumanizing. These are not factory-line products. Each woman has her own energy, her own personality, her own preferences. You’re not going to have chemistry with every single person, and you’re certainly not going to get the same experience with every provider, even if they offer a similar service label.

 

Two providers may both offer GFE, but one might be soft-spoken and nurturing, while another is bold and flirty. That difference alone can completely change the experience, because the service is rendered by a human being, not a template.

 

And no, you're not experiencing the service “through the eyes of hobbyists.” You’re experiencing your own booking, with your own expectations, preferences, and connection. Asking hobbyists if someone is “worth it” based on a label makes zero sense, because chemistry, connection, and enjoyment are all subjective. You want to know if she is worth it to you? Book her. That’s how this works.

 

You asked, “Why are they classified into two categories?” again, that’s their choice. Some ladies charge more because they want exclusivity, fewer clients, and longer dates. Others may charge less and prefer shorter dates or more volume. Both are valid. That’s a business model, not a value judgment.

 

Same with agencies, some women prefer to manage everything themselves, others would rather let someone else handle screening, marketing, and logistics so they can focus on their clients. It’s a personal business decision.

 

And finally, stop crying about your “right to ask questions.” You do have that right. And I have every right to challenge what you're saying if I believe it's rooted in a problematic mindset. You don’t get to post on a public forum and then get upset when someone disagrees with you. That’s how discussions work.

 

I don’t need to work for an agency to have an opinion when men start talking about whether women who charge more are “worth it.” You either book her, experience what she offers, and leave a review, or don’t book and move on. But constantly questioning why someone charges more, or calling the “elite” label into doubt like it’s a scam, is not curiosity, it’s entitlement. If it’s not for you, move on. Simple.

 

You keep putting your words in my mouth (which btw if you haven't noticed, is disrespectful by itself). I have never questioned a woman's choice. Any woman can charge whatever they want to. But same way, I can ask my questions as long as YFL has not clearly defined what the difference is. I am paying for the service. Not you. 

 

So what? I care about what experience I am getting if I pay more. Wotz wrong in that? Yes experience might differ but I cannot see every single person to determine which experience I like better. So I ask fellow hobbyists. Who are you to judge whether I need to experience with my own eyes and not rely on other hobbyists? This is a platform where everyone can share their experience. I am person who is okay with making a decision based on that. It's my right, my choice, my decision. 

 

You said it's a 'business model'. And for your kind information, anybody who pays to a business has the right to understand whether its worth it. I am glad that you called this out as a business and not a service. So that makes my statement and question so valid. Isn't it?

 

You have every right to challenge. Who questioned that? If anyone is crying it's you since you misunderstood my whole point. Yes this is a public forum and I have every right to post the same way you consider you have every right to challenge. It's a two way street so no point in getting offended.

 

I never said YFL is a scam, in fact I am one of their regulars. Again, don't put your words in my mouth. Constantly questioning? Can you show me another post of mine on same topic? You are just raising some false accusations to put me in a bad spot. Or maybe YFL? If I may borrow your words, this is after all a 'BUSINESS' right?

[Pamela Luscious 196]

I’ve already explained it clearly. I’m not going to repeat myself for the fourth time. Stop saying I’m putting words in your mouth when everyone here can literally read what you wrote. That tactic doesn’t work.

 

At this point, it’s not a lack of explanation, it’s a lack of understanding. I can explain it to you, but I can’t make you understand it. And I’m not going to waste more energy trying.

 

You’ve told on yourself, and that’s on you for exposing yourself publicly.

 

“I’m paying for a service, not you” tells me everything I need to know. That one sentence proves exactly the point I’ve been making this entire time.

 

You don’t see the provider as a person offering an experience. You see her as a product you pay for, which is exactly why your question came across as dehumanizing from the start. You can say you “respect women’s choices” all you want, but the language you keep using contradicts that completely.

 

[TonyK 192]

2 hours ago, Pamela Luscious said:

I’ve already explained it clearly. I’m not going to repeat myself for the fourth time. Stop saying I’m putting words in your mouth when everyone here can literally read what you wrote. That tactic doesn’t work.

 

At this point, it’s not a lack of explanation, it’s a lack of understanding. I can explain it to you, but I can’t make you understand it. And I’m not going to waste more energy trying.

 

You’ve told on yourself, and that’s on you for exposing yourself publicly.

 

“I’m paying for a service, not you” tells me everything I need to know. That one sentence proves exactly the point I’ve been making this entire time.

 

You don’t see the provider as a person offering an experience. You see her as a product you pay for, which is exactly why your question came across as dehumanizing from the start. You can say you “respect women’s choices” all you want, but the language you keep using contradicts that completely.

 

Lol! What you said is true. Its lack of understanding. But it's you who doesn't understand because you can think only from your point of view. It was you who got exposed when you said it's a 'business' model. If it's a business, then I am the customer and I have every right to ask. And you are right. I am the one paying for the service. Not you. If that offends you, I can't help.

[Pamela Luscious 196]

29 minutes ago, TonyK said:

Lol! What you said is true. Its lack of understanding. But it's you who doesn't understand because you can think only from your point of view. It was you who got exposed when you said it's a 'business' model. If it's a business, then I am the customer and I have every right to ask. And you are right. I am the one paying for the service. Not you. If that offends you, I can't help.

This isn’t Walmart. The customer isn’t always right.

 

Obviously it’s a business, anything generating revenue and paying taxes operates under a business model. That doesn’t mean you get to treat people like products or assume every experience should be “worth it” by your standards.

 

Common sense really isn’t that common, clearly.

[Yourfrenchlady 2616]

Hello everyone,

Just to clarify: all of the ladies make their own decisions regarding their donations and where they choose to tour. As booking assistants, we can offer guidance based on our experience and knowledge, but ultimately, the final choices are entirely theirs.

 

For those in the Maritimes—just a heads-up—it's become quite rare to find anyone offering rates below $300 in the rest of Canada, even in cities like Montreal. The typical range in most other provinces now tends to be between $350 and $550. Of course, there are different types of providers, and while all the ladies are beautiful, it's up to each companion to decide what "elite" means to them. That said, we encourage respect and avoid judging whether someone is "worth" a certain rate. We might even take out the term elite and just keep the donation set on each page.

 

As for Halifax touring: yes, it's become more challenging for many ladies to visit Halifax due to the high cost of flights and increasingly expensive hotels. New Brunswick is accessible by car and has more affordable accommodations. If anyone in Halifax has suggestions—such as reasonably priced hotels or short-term rentals—or is willing to contribute toward expenses to help bring a particular provider to the area, please don’t hesitate to reach out. Every bit helps and is truly appreciated 😊

 

Thanks for your understanding and continued support!

 

[TonyK 192]

On 7/2/2025 at 11:01 PM, Pamela Luscious said:

This isn’t Walmart. The customer isn’t always right.

 

Obviously it’s a business, anything generating revenue and paying taxes operates under a business model. That doesn’t mean you get to treat people like products or assume every experience should be “worth it” by your standards.

 

Common sense really isn’t that common, clearly.

Is it so? In that case the business owner is also not always right!

 

If it's a business then I dare to furnish the legal business name and GST/HST number. Any business can easily provide it as long as they are paying taxes right? You are now self mocking. 

 

I would rather call this as a service model, not a business model. That's why girls here are often mentioned as 'Service Providers' and not 'Business Woman'. There is a difference but I guess everyone wouldn't get it, as you mentioned common sense is not that common! 

[Pamela Luscious 196]

1 hour ago, TonyK said:

Is it so? In that case the business owner is also not always right!

 

If it's a business then I dare to furnish the legal business name and GST/HST number. Any business can easily provide it as long as they are paying taxes right? You are now self mocking. 

 

I would rather call this as a service model, not a business model. That's why girls here are often mentioned as 'Service Providers' and not 'Business Woman'. There is a difference but I guess everyone wouldn't get it, as you mentioned common sense is not that common! 

You’ve now shifted the conversation from rates and value to tax IDs and terminology. Not because you’re making a point, but because you’re grasping for control after your own words betrayed your mindset.

 

For the record, “service model” vs. “business model” is a distinction without a difference in this context. Anything that involves compensation for time, energy, and skill is a business, whether independent or agency-supported. Sex work doesn’t lose legitimacy because it’s often labeled as a “service.” It still involves boundaries, strategy, marketing, client relations, and yes, business decisions.

 

But none of this sidesteps what’s been at the center of this the entire time. You exposed how you truly view providers. Reduced a human being to a transactional product, and everything since then has been an attempt to backpedal and reframe.

 

You’re not asking for clarity. You’re dodging accountability.

 

You don’t need a GST number to respect someone’s boundaries. And you certainly don’t need to redefine vocabulary to justify a post that, at its core, questioned whether women are “worth it” for charging more.

 

Each response you’ve posted has only confirmed what was obvious from the start.

[MikeyInHalifax 301]

Can you two please stop arguing. It's unseemly 

[Pamela Luscious 196]

11 minutes ago, MikeyInHalifax said:

Can you two please stop arguing. It's unseemly 

I will never be told to stay quiet when it comes to respect for women in this industry. I will always speak up when someone degrades us, because our safety, dignity, and autonomy are non-negotiable.

 

This isn’t about “arguing.”

This is about calling out behavior that puts women down and encourages others to do the same.

 

If that makes people uncomfortable, good.

It means the conversation is needed. Open your eyes to the bigger picture.

[Pamela Luscious 196]

As if I was supposed to stay quiet while someone makes a whole thread questioning whether a woman is “worth it” because she charges more or calls herself elite?

 

She could call herself a goddess, a queen, a unicorn, and charge $100K if she wants. Who TF are we to tell her she’s not “worth” that?

 

It’s her body. Her time. Her brand. Her rules.

 

No one’s forcing anyone to book her.

But the moment you start publicly debating if her rate is “justified” just because you personally wouldn’t pay it, that’s not a discussion. That’s entitlement, ego, and internalized misogyny.

 

This isn’t about arguing. This is about defending the basic right every woman has to set her value without being picked apart like she’s on sale.

 

If that makes some of you uncomfortable, good. That means it needed to be said.

[Coco1 82]

L

25 minutes ago, Pamela Luscious said:

As if I was supposed to stay quiet while someone makes a whole thread questioning whether a woman is “worth it” because she charges more or calls herself elite?

 

She could call herself a goddess, a queen, a unicorn, and charge $100K if she wants. Who TF are we to tell her she’s not “worth” that?

 

It’s her body. Her time. Her brand. Her rules.

 

No one’s forcing anyone to book her.

But the moment you start publicly debating if her rate is “justified” just because you personally wouldn’t pay it, that’s not a discussion. That’s entitlement, ego, and internalized misogyny.

 

This isn’t about arguing. This is about defending the basic right every woman has to set her value without being picked apart like she’s on sale.

 

If that makes some of you uncomfortable, good. That means it needed to be said.

Let it rest. I wish there was a moderator here, this whole thread has been high jacked with drivel. 

[Pamela Luscious 196]

Calling a respectful discussion about women’s value and autonomy ‘drivel’ just proves why it needed to happen. I stood up for respect, if that makes some people uncomfortable, so be it. I’ve said what I had to say.

[Coco1 82]

Put it in another thread then! This thread started out as a YFL discussion until you decided to make it about yourself. No one wants to read it and I bet they haven't read it. I read about one paragraph at the start and skipped through the rest. 

[Pamela Luscious 196]

2 minutes ago, Coco1 said:

Put it in another thread then! This thread started out as a YFL discussion until you decided to make it about yourself. No one wants to read it and I bet they haven't read it. I read about one paragraph at the start and skipped through the rest. 

How about you leave since you can't follow the thread. I am on topic. 

[MikeyInHalifax 301]

Your arguments are both futile. Do either of you think that you're changing anyone's opinion here? News flash! The answer is no. The most precious resource anyone in this universe has is time. And you've both wasted not only your own, but all of ours. Move. On.