Contact

[Lemmy Caution 159]

Holy shit. You guys are still out here patting yourselves on the back for being so respectful to the needs of providers? You're too much 😂

You can continue to give out your personal info to whomever you like. I wouldn't trust my best friend with this info. None of you must have: a girlfriend, a wife, a public-facing job, or a decent amount of money. Because the prospect of potentially ruining your life or livelihood over getting laid is insane. And sure, you go ahead and "do your homework". But at some point you'll send it to the wrong person and you will get in trouble for it. Hell, it might not have to be the fault of the provider. Ask Google, or Canadian Tire, or the fucking federal government. Digital data is not secure.

I've had no issues seeing plenty of people and keeping it as anonymous as possible. And I'm super respectful, I assure you. Often to the point of limiting my own pleasure at the risk of doing something to make them at all uncomfortable.

But I will be doing so anonymously.

[Cjthomas 1626]

48 minutes ago, Lemmy Caution said:

Holy shit. You guys are still out here patting yourselves on the back for being so respectful to the needs of providers? You're too much 😂

You can continue to give out your personal info to whomever you like. I wouldn't trust my best friend with this info. None of you must have: a girlfriend, a wife, a public-facing job, or a decent amount of money. Because the prospect of potentially ruining your life or livelihood over getting laid is insane. And sure, you go ahead and "do your homework". But at some point you'll send it to the wrong person and you will get in trouble for it. Hell, it might not have to be the fault of the provider. Ask Google, or Canadian Tire, or the fucking federal government. Digital data is not secure.

I've had no issues seeing plenty of people and keeping it as anonymous as possible. And I'm super respectful, I assure you. Often to the point of limiting my own pleasure at the risk of doing something to make them at all uncomfortable.

But I will be doing so anonymously.

And yet here you are, again! Let me caution you Lemmy Caution. Once you are on the web you are not anonymous. Anyone with the right amount of experience can find you if they truly wanted to. The few of  you who keep trying to impress upon others that you’ve some how protected yourselves by contacting escorts who don’t screen while posting here under your pseudonyms is laughable. What I don’t understand is your irreverence towards those who screen and your constant need to come here to tell everyone why you won’t see those escorts. Why not just hire who you prefer and go about your day. Some of you are starting to sound like paranoid, petty jerks who can’t stand seeing women having the ability and right to run their business as they see fit.

[LadiesFirst 876]

1 hour ago, Lemmy Caution said:

Holy shit. You guys are still out here patting yourselves on the back for being so respectful to the needs of providers? You're too much 😂

You can continue to give out your personal info to whomever you like. I wouldn't trust my best friend with this info. None of you must have: a girlfriend, a wife, a public-facing job, or a decent amount of money. Because the prospect of potentially ruining your life or livelihood over getting laid is insane. And sure, you go ahead and "do your homework". But at some point you'll send it to the wrong person and you will get in trouble for it. Hell, it might not have to be the fault of the provider. Ask Google, or Canadian Tire, or the fucking federal government. Digital data is not secure.

I've had no issues seeing plenty of people and keeping it as anonymous as possible. And I'm super respectful, I assure you. Often to the point of limiting my own pleasure at the risk of doing something to make them at all uncomfortable.

But I will be doing so anonymously.

 

Refusing screening to protect their relationship which, statistically, is already halfway out the door. Truly a love story for the ages. The real threat to the relationship probably isn’t the screening form. I’m sure she’ll sleep soundly with your disclaimer and knowing you claim you’re respectful. Nothing says safety like a stranger’s self-assessment, you know, for her peace of mind and safety.

 

[Pamela Luscious 410]

Notice that the people who complain the most about screening often approach the conversation with an aggressive or undermining tone. That contrast speaks for itself.

 

That is exactly why we screen.

[Exotic Touch Danielle 31903]

3 hours ago, Lemmy Caution said:

Holy shit. You guys are still out here patting yourselves on the back for being so respectful to the needs of providers? You're too much 😂

You can continue to give out your personal info to whomever you like. I wouldn't trust my best friend with this info. None of you must have: a girlfriend, a wife, a public-facing job, or a decent amount of money. Because the prospect of potentially ruining your life or livelihood over getting laid is insane. And sure, you go ahead and "do your homework". But at some point you'll send it to the wrong person and you will get in trouble for it. Hell, it might not have to be the fault of the provider. Ask Google, or Canadian Tire, or the fucking federal government. Digital data is not secure.

I've had no issues seeing plenty of people and keeping it as anonymous as possible. And I'm super respectful, I assure you. Often to the point of limiting my own pleasure at the risk of doing something to make them at all uncomfortable.

But I will be doing so anonymously.

LMFAO you sound like a real delight to spend time with 

Deposits save me from guys like you

[Mikeyboy 27140]

God, I can't believe we are still having this discussion on this site after all these years. It's been beaten to death over and over. 

The bottom line is that there are clients who don't mind screening, and those who do. Luckily there are also both sp's who require them, and those who don't. The people on this site tend to lean toward the former in each category so you are just picking a fight to declare that people are stupid to do screening. Accept our differences and move along so we can stop having this argument over and over ad nauseam. You are entitled to your opinions but you don't need to imply that others are wrong. Enjoy the hobby on your terms and accept when others do so on theirs.

 

 

 

 

[LadiesFirst 876]

3 hours ago, Mikeyboy said:

God, I can't believe we are still having this discussion on this site after all these years. It's been beaten to death over and over. 

The bottom line is that there are clients who don't mind screening, and those who do. Luckily there are also both sp's who require them, and those who don't. The people on this site tend to lean toward the former in each category so you are just picking a fight to declare that people are stupid to do screening. Accept our differences and move along so we can stop having this argument over and over ad nauseam. You are entitled to your opinions but you don't need to imply that others are wrong. Enjoy the hobby on your terms and accept when others do so on theirs.

 

 

 

 

Totally agree with your bottom line, clients who don’t mind screening and those that do. The companions that don’t require it could likely someday want to know who they’re dealing with in case they needed recourse for some reason or another.

I will continue to imply the non screeners are wrong though, and they should be pushed back against.
 

Msmanda raised raised great points on the first page, the situation about not being able to identify the guy with all the aliases. I’m glad nobody was physically harmed but same thing could happen with someone spreading more than fake reviews (disease or violence) and it would make it more difficult to track down an anonymous random.
 

Pamela raised good points about new girls entering the industry and feeling pressured to adopt unsafe practices because they fear having too many boundaries becomes a”turn off” so the end up doing things they may end up doing things they don’t want.

 

I would have quoted them but don’t know how to do more than 1 quote.

 

 So yeah I feel it’s more than an opinion that screening is the “ right” way and the non screeners are “wrong”, for safety issues. I also agree that you’re correct, their will always be both clients and sp’s that screen and don’t. I accept it but don’t love it. 
 

I will continue to enjoy the hobby and I do accept that others will too on their own terms but I’ll give a little push back, from time to time, applaud the others for doing the same even if the argument does get tiring.