Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/08/25 in all areas
-
6 pointsThe problem isn't that y'all discuss us.. It's the tone used when (some of) you do đ and that's just what we can see publicly, don't get me started on the DMs here Usage on this forum has died down to what it has, and I'm sure you have noticed that providers aren't as active in the lyla community/discussions as they used to be.. Now it's just a boys club here, and the tone has changed as such This used to be a place of respect for sps, and now its losing that vibe for more of an sp411 feel.. How's that forum doing, btw? By all means, share your opinions, but do know that we use these threads for screening as well as you do đ
-
5 pointsThis argument alone. Has made me NOT want to ever see Pamela. The constant arguing and insecure need to constantly defend her postion. Which , frankly. I agree with. However, you two have taken it to another level. Its ridiculous. I wouldn't book based on this alone. I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. You two need to stop the constant back and forth. We get it. Your right. He is wrong... just let it go. You have both said your piece five times over.
-
4 pointsLet me put it simply: Letâs say you usually book providers around $300. Then you come across someone whoâs your exact type, but she charges $500. If sheâs within your budget, you either book her or you donât, no questions, no debate. Thatâs her rate. End of story. You might end up having the best experience of your life. Or maybe your favorite provider ends up being someone at $250. Thatâs how personal preference works, not price tags. But the issue is when people start complaining, dissecting, and comparing groups of women like weâre two different models of fleshlight. Thatâs not curiosity, thatâs dehumanizing. Weâre not toys. Weâre human beings. You either book or move on. It really is that simple. If you donât want to âriskâ spending more on someone at a higher rate, then donât. No oneâs forcing you. But someone else is booking her, and theyâre not turning it into a debate.
-
4 pointsI've personally given reviews and as a Gen Xer it's always been an uncomfortable thing for me to do.......so I try to keep it simple and not get too personal. The only review I look for before seeing an SP for the first time is "is she real?"......"does she lie about services?"...."is that her in the pics?" ...everything else is chemistry and often times a client's dissatisfaction can be traced back to the client himself. The term "worth it"....admittedly hits hard for me too. I have been with SP's who were very highly regarded and the experience was meh.....my ego isn't that great that I can't accept that I'm part of the reason the experience was less than perfect. My favorite SP is rarely reco'ed and I have seen her on the "scams" thread?...I assure you she's not a scam.....but someone had a less than favorable encounter with her and knowing her as I do, I know who the unfavorable person likely was.... Can you imagine if we came across a site where SP's judge their clients? Let's keep in mind that these are all wonderful ladies doing wonderful work......there are SP's I have chosen never to return to.......but having any type of intimacy with a beautiful lady is always worth it! Just my .02 cents
-
4 pointsPretty sad display from some people here. Pamela is such an amazing person, who deserves respect. I for one will always support a strong woman like her. The need for some people to have the final word is pathetic and Iâm sure sheâs happy that sheâs scared you off from booking her in the future
-
4 pointsHappy July đ Some of you may already know, but Iâm finally back after taking more than a year off for personal reasons. Itâs been a ride, but I am so so happy to be reconnecting with my favourite people and meeting new ones as well. July availability Tuesday 8th Friday 18th Monday 21st Wednesday 23rd Wednesday 30th Thursday 31st I will have pretty limited availability for the summer while I acclimate to working again, get new photos taken, and work on a website, so I really do recommend pre-booking. Iâll also be taking new clients starting this month! Text, email, DM for bookings and more information. Please keep in mind that I have a new number as of last summer, so email may be the best option if youâre unsure. Email: [email protected] Cheers, Emma xx
-
3 pointsHey everyone, Really appreciate the perspectives shared in this thread â itâs obvious people care, and thatâs a good thing. Letâs be real: yes, this is a human-to-human interaction, but itâs still a service. And whether we like it or not, if a client doesnât perceive value in whatâs being offered â whether itâs price, experience, or connection â then the product naturally becomes less desirable to them. Thatâs not a judgment of anyoneâs worth â itâs just how markets work, in any industry. At the same time, providers are absolutely entitled to set their own rates, define their value, and work on their own terms. They donât owe anyone an explanation. Just like clients get to decide what suits their needs and budget, providers get to choose what aligns with theirs. No oneâs wrong for asking questions, and no oneâs wrong for setting boundaries. So yeah â this isnât about objectifying or moralizing. Itâs about choice. Clients choose what theyâre comfortable paying for. Providers choose how they want to operate.
-
3 pointsBut we're not selling leggings that won't rip.. We're not out here touting our technical fabrics lmao We're selling personalized experiences, with more variables than if someone selected the right fit of leggings for their size/body type. đ You can show up with terrible hygiene to buy leggings and still be served a fabulous pair of leggings lol Not so much with sp experiences though
-
3 pointsNo oneâs forcing you to read or comment, yet here you are, again. Funny how you say Iâm missing the point, when the entire thread was about questioning whether a woman is âworth itâ if she charges more or calls herself elite. Thatâs what I addressed. Yâall are the ones who made it about me. If you want to stay on topic, great, do that. But stop projecting and trying to shift the narrative just because I wonât let the disrespect slide. And letâs be clear, Iâm not here to change anyoneâs mind. I already know some of you wonât get it. Iâm here to help you expose yourselves. This thread has over 8,000 views and a lot of them are from providers. Trust me, Iâm not wasting my time, Iâm doing this community a favor. So please, continue. Youâre doing a fantastic job of showing everyone exactly what kind of men weâre dealing with.
-
3 pointsTotally agree. A provider who is worth seeing and is highly sought after doesn't have the time nor the inclination to be here bickering with people.
-
3 pointsThat's totally fine! If a woman standing her ground and supporting women with respect offends you, then I'm clearly not for you. And gladly, if other hobbyists on here canât handle that either, Iâm not for them, too. But do remember, many real men love a woman with a backbone and care for her community. If you think a woman calmly defending her position is 'arguing,' maybe itâs time to ask why my tone bothers you more than the disrespect Iâm responding to. I speak up not to please everyone, but because I care. If that makes me âtoo vocalâ for some, Iâm okay with that. Swer forums need to set the bar for respect higher, and Iâll always be on the side that pushes it upward. Funny how degrading women gets a pass around here⌠but the moment one stands up for herself, thatâs what people find offensive. Priorities say a lot.
-
2 pointsThereâs clearly passion behind your words, and I respect that. That said, I think itâs worth highlighting a bit of a contradiction in your stance. On the one hand, you say clients should âbook within their means and respect our autonomy,â and that no one should question a providerâs worth. Totally fair. Autonomy and boundaries go both ways. But in the same breath, you argue that clients who choose differently â particularly those seeking more budget-aligned services â are âdehumanizingâ women by even comparing options. That seems like a double standard. Youâre defending a providerâs right to set her price (as you should), but dismissing a clientâs right to assess value â even if he does so respectfully and does his homework. Isnât that also a form of autonomy? You also call out the risk of âobjectifying,â yet imply that women charging less are somehow dragging down the others. That frames lower-cost providers as threats rather than fellow professionals making strategic decisions that suit their goals. Feels like we canât talk about rates without walking into a moral minefield â and thatâs the inconsistency. Ultimately, we should call out disrespect, but not every value-based decision is disrespectful. Sometimes itâs just economics â not a judgment on a personâs worth. Anyway, I appreciate the dialogue. These conversations arenât always comfortable, but they are necessary if we want transparency and mutual respect in a space that often lacks both.
-
2 pointsAs per usual , the common theme of this thread is " missing the piont " . That logic is obviously to complicated for you to understand. Personally , your backbone and opinion matters not to me. There is sticking up for yourself. And then there is trying to beat it to death with words. I told you. I agreed with your piont of view. Your obsession with having to convince someone that you cannot. And will never change there piont of view is inherently a waste of time. The meaning of insanity comes to mind. I for one , won't bother to respond to any other posts you make on this subject . As this matter is of little importance to me. I will leave it up to the sycophants and beta's to help convince him.
-
2 pointsMY FIRST THREESOMEđĽşđ I unleashed my inner demon and filmed the hottest content Iâve ever createdđ𼾠Warning! WILL cause immediate arousal. I always knew i wanted to experience with another girlđŠđźââ¤ď¸âđâđŠđť. Iâd say i did a pretty good job for my first timeđđŚ Can you be the judge of that for me daddy?𼺠Check out my Fansly for all our pics/videos we took! Close ups, dildos, licking, fucking, all kinds of filthy funđâŹď¸ https://fans.ly/Brooklynbaaby
-
2 pointsYou're still contradicting yourself, youâre literally asking, âWhy pay the elite rate instead of the regular rate?â Thatâs the womanâs choice. No one is being shackled or forced into a category. She decides what to charge, and thatâs it. What youâre implying is: why pay more if you can get the same for less? And yes, that is dehumanizing. These are not factory-line products. Each woman has her own energy, her own personality, her own preferences. Youâre not going to have chemistry with every single person, and youâre certainly not going to get the same experience with every provider, even if they offer a similar service label. Two providers may both offer GFE, but one might be soft-spoken and nurturing, while another is bold and flirty. That difference alone can completely change the experience, because the service is rendered by a human being, not a template. And no, you're not experiencing the service âthrough the eyes of hobbyists.â Youâre experiencing your own booking, with your own expectations, preferences, and connection. Asking hobbyists if someone is âworth itâ based on a label makes zero sense, because chemistry, connection, and enjoyment are all subjective. You want to know if she is worth it to you? Book her. Thatâs how this works. You asked, âWhy are they classified into two categories?â again, thatâs their choice. Some ladies charge more because they want exclusivity, fewer clients, and longer dates. Others may charge less and prefer shorter dates or more volume. Both are valid. Thatâs a business model, not a value judgment. Same with agencies, some women prefer to manage everything themselves, others would rather let someone else handle screening, marketing, and logistics so they can focus on their clients. Itâs a personal business decision. And finally, stop crying about your âright to ask questions.â You do have that right. And I have every right to challenge what you're saying if I believe it's rooted in a problematic mindset. You donât get to post on a public forum and then get upset when someone disagrees with you. Thatâs how discussions work. I donât need to work for an agency to have an opinion when men start talking about whether women who charge more are âworth it.â You either book her, experience what she offers, and leave a review, or donât book and move on. But constantly questioning why someone charges more, or calling the âeliteâ label into doubt like itâs a scam, is not curiosity, itâs entitlement. If itâs not for you, move on. Simple.
-
1 pointThis is exactly why discussing rates never used to be permitted here But alas.. There are no rules to this forum anymore đ
-
1 pointI agree, level-headed conversations are rare. I feel like I'm pushing my luck with my unsolicited and rarely sought after opinion on this topic đ. I think weâre still circling around a core tension here. You say youâve never implied clients who choose based on budget are being disrespectful â but the line gets blurry when we consider your stance on how questions about pricing are received. To be blunt: youâve drawn a pretty hard line between asking âwhy does she charge more?â and âis she worth it?â, but in practice, those questions often stem from the same place, someone trying to understand value, not necessarily to diminish it. Letâs be real, every market involves some level of comparison, and while I agree no one is entitled to nitpick a provider they donât plan to book, the fact that pricing exists at all means people will assess it. Thatâs not objectification. Thatâs literally how decisions get made in any business â especially one where the experience is personal, varied, and subjective. You emphasize that providers arenât blow-up dolls,100% agreed, but suggesting that discussing value at all somehow equates to dehumanization feels like a leap. Intent matters. Tone matters. Blanket framing all public dialogue about pricing as disrespectful just reinforces the idea that some topics are off-limits, even when approached respectfully. Thatâs not protecting autonomy â thatâs policing perspective. No oneâs saying a provider owes an explanation for her rates. But if sheâs in a public space marketing a premium service, some curiosity is natural â even expected. Shutting that down entirely doesnât elevate the conversation, it just suppresses nuance. At the end of the day, autonomy cuts both ways. Youâre absolutely right, her time, her energy, her sensuality, her boundaries. No argument there. But the same courtesy should extend to those asking questions in good faith. Dismissing every value-based conversation as âAmazon-level objectificationâ erases that good faith and ironically becomes its own kind of reduction. Appreciate the exchange and will leave you to your thoughts on this topic. Kind regards.
-
1 pointFirst of all, I appreciate your ability to communicate respectfully without getting emotional, thatâs rare and valuable in these discussions. That said, I want to clarify something: I never said that clients who book within their budget are dehumanizing, nor did I say that providers who charge less are âdragging downâ others. What I have said, and Iâve repeated this multiple times now, is that asking whether providers who charge more are âworth itâ is disrespectful and dehumanizing. That specific framing reduces a human being to a price tag and treats her work, boundaries, and self-worth as something for strangers to publicly dissect. Thatâs the issue. Iâve also acknowledged, repeatedly, that two providers at different price points may offer the same type of service on paper, but they are still different people. And because we are not robots or blowup dolls, the experience will be different. Our rates are based on many things beyond just the act itself, it's energy, time, boundaries, style, lifestyle, demand, and personal comfort. I fully support every providerâs right to charge what aligns with her goals, whether thatâs a lower or higher rate. And yes, every client also has the autonomy to choose services within their budget. But what they donât have is the right to pick apart women theyâre not even planning to book, just because those women donât fit their budget. You said it âfeels like we canât talk about rates.â Well⌠thatâs kind of the point. Rates are personal and business decisions made by each provider for herself. Itâs not open for public debate or cost-benefit analysis, especially by those who were never going to book her anyway. Itâs her time, her energy, her sensuality, her boundaries... her. If someone doesnât understand that or thinks heâs entitled to question her pricing like heâs shopping on Amazon, then thatâs not a respectful discussion about value, thatâs objectification, plain and simple. If a client canât afford a higher rate or doesnât personally see the value, he is always free to book within his budget. But that should never turn into a debate about the worth of women who were never on his radar to begin with, because someone else is booking her. And respecting that is the bare minimum.
-
1 pointIt's times like this that I really miss Lydia and her forum administration. This is not the place it was a couple of years ago where a core group from both sides would come here to not only ensure everyone's safety, but also have a bit of fun and enjoyment.
-
1 pointwhile i agree that woman are absolutely allowed to charge whatever they want.. heres my take... If i go to the mall and someones selling clothing and the sign reads "the best pair on earth, will not tear when you bend over, ultra comfortable, perfect fit" but they cost twice as much . You purchase them and they are not comfortable at all, rip the first time you wear them and are not true to the size labelled. Are we just suppose to accept that Hey someone poured there life savings into designing those pants, who are you to say they arent any good. My point being.... While i agree that women should be able to set there own prices and restrictions and worth , there is definitely a problem with fake advertising. How many times do i have to meet someone new that claims to offer GFE and charges high end prices and then i show up to someone who looks nothing like the pictures and delivers a terrible service . Theres nothing wrong with sharing our opinions on this forum with how an experience went . Any provider whos doing there clients right wouldnt have an issue with that
-
1 pointYou made the right call. There are some service providing locations in this city where multiple girls are working out of at the same time, so you can have a very awkward moment of clients meeting each other as they arrive or leave.
-
1 point@Drax88 Book with confident, they are good with newbee, be open in what you like, dislike, wish to try, limites, etc ... try it its a nice feeling !!!
-
1 pointHey Gents! I was able to score an Incall for tonight, Iâm not sure when the next time will be that Iâll be able to offer Incall so if youâve been waiting to see me tonight is the night! 902-400-3220 To Book! XO Alyssa đ
-
1 pointYour arguments are both futile. Do either of you think that you're changing anyone's opinion here? News flash! The answer is no. The most precious resource anyone in this universe has is time. And you've both wasted not only your own, but all of ours. Move. On.
-
1 point
-
1 pointPut it in another thread then! This thread started out as a YFL discussion until you decided to make it about yourself. No one wants to read it and I bet they haven't read it. I read about one paragraph at the start and skipped through the rest.
-
1 pointAs if I was supposed to stay quiet while someone makes a whole thread questioning whether a woman is âworth itâ because she charges more or calls herself elite? She could call herself a goddess, a queen, a unicorn, and charge $100K if she wants. Who TF are we to tell her sheâs not âworthâ that? Itâs her body. Her time. Her brand. Her rules. No oneâs forcing anyone to book her. But the moment you start publicly debating if her rate is âjustifiedâ just because you personally wouldnât pay it, thatâs not a discussion. Thatâs entitlement, ego, and internalized misogyny. This isnât about arguing. This is about defending the basic right every woman has to set her value without being picked apart like sheâs on sale. If that makes some of you uncomfortable, good. That means it needed to be said.
-
1 pointI will never be told to stay quiet when it comes to respect for women in this industry. I will always speak up when someone degrades us, because our safety, dignity, and autonomy are non-negotiable. This isnât about âarguing.â This is about calling out behavior that puts women down and encourages others to do the same. If that makes people uncomfortable, good. It means the conversation is needed. Open your eyes to the bigger picture.
-
1 point
-
1 pointYouâve now shifted the conversation from rates and value to tax IDs and terminology. Not because youâre making a point, but because youâre grasping for control after your own words betrayed your mindset. For the record, âservice modelâ vs. âbusiness modelâ is a distinction without a difference in this context. Anything that involves compensation for time, energy, and skill is a business, whether independent or agency-supported. Sex work doesnât lose legitimacy because itâs often labeled as a âservice.â It still involves boundaries, strategy, marketing, client relations, and yes, business decisions. But none of this sidesteps whatâs been at the center of this the entire time. You exposed how you truly view providers. Reduced a human being to a transactional product, and everything since then has been an attempt to backpedal and reframe. Youâre not asking for clarity. Youâre dodging accountability. You donât need a GST number to respect someoneâs boundaries. And you certainly donât need to redefine vocabulary to justify a post that, at its core, questioned whether women are âworth itâ for charging more. Each response youâve posted has only confirmed what was obvious from the start.
-
1 pointHello everyone, Just to clarify: all of the ladies make their own decisions regarding their donations and where they choose to tour. As booking assistants, we can offer guidance based on our experience and knowledge, but ultimately, the final choices are entirely theirs. For those in the Maritimesâjust a heads-upâit's become quite rare to find anyone offering rates below $300 in the rest of Canada, even in cities like Montreal. The typical range in most other provinces now tends to be between $350 and $550. Of course, there are different types of providers, and while all the ladies are beautiful, it's up to each companion to decide what "elite" means to them. That said, we encourage respect and avoid judging whether someone is "worth" a certain rate. We might even take out the term elite and just keep the donation set on each page. As for Halifax touring: yes, it's become more challenging for many ladies to visit Halifax due to the high cost of flights and increasingly expensive hotels. New Brunswick is accessible by car and has more affordable accommodations. If anyone in Halifax has suggestionsâsuch as reasonably priced hotels or short-term rentalsâor is willing to contribute toward expenses to help bring a particular provider to the area, please donât hesitate to reach out. Every bit helps and is truly appreciated đ Thanks for your understanding and continued support!
-
1 pointHi all, Are there any tantra massage providers in Halifax or in Nova Scotia? There used to be a few in Halifax and I dearly miss them. Any info would be greatly appreciated, Thanks,
-
1 pointThis isnât Walmart. The customer isnât always right. Obviously itâs a business, anything generating revenue and paying taxes operates under a business model. That doesnât mean you get to treat people like products or assume every experience should be âworth itâ by your standards. Common sense really isnât that common, clearly.
-
1 pointIâve already explained it clearly. Iâm not going to repeat myself for the fourth time. Stop saying Iâm putting words in your mouth when everyone here can literally read what you wrote. That tactic doesnât work. At this point, itâs not a lack of explanation, itâs a lack of understanding. I can explain it to you, but I canât make you understand it. And Iâm not going to waste more energy trying. Youâve told on yourself, and thatâs on you for exposing yourself publicly. âIâm paying for a service, not youâ tells me everything I need to know. That one sentence proves exactly the point Iâve been making this entire time. You donât see the provider as a person offering an experience. You see her as a product you pay for, which is exactly why your question came across as dehumanizing from the start. You can say you ârespect womenâs choicesâ all you want, but the language you keep using contradicts that completely.
-
1 pointYou're contradicting yourself. You literally asked if itâs âworth itâ to book an elite provider when âall YFL girls are equally beautiful and offer the same service.â That is questioning a woman's worth, whether you want to admit it or not. I didnât redirect the topic, I quoted your own words. Just because these women work under the same agency doesnât mean theyâre clones. Theyâre all human, each with their own personality, energy, boundaries, and vibe. By questioning the idea that theyâre unique, you're basically telling on yourself, youâre viewing them as interchangeable objects instead of individuals. You need to realize itâs a personal choice how someone advertises herself, her photos, her rates, her availability, and how she defines her experience. No one owes you a breakdown or justification. Rates are based on what she feels her time, energy, and presence are worth, not what you think they âshouldâ be based on other women in the same agency. The only way to know if itâs âworth itâ to you is to book and experience what she uniquely offers. As a client, you're not just paying for a standard service, youâre paying for an experience with a real human being. If itâs not in your budget, thatâs totally fine, but move on respectfully without reducing women to categories and price points to make sense of what you donât understand.
-
1 pointQuestioning the worth of a woman because you believe they're "all equally beautiful and offer the same standard GFE service" is exactly the issue here. Youâre not booking a copy-paste product. you're engaging with a real human being who shares her time, energy, and intimacy with you. A providerâs rate reflects far more than appearance or a service label, it includes her boundaries, experience, emotional labor, safety, and how she chooses to value herself. Every woman is unique, even if you think the service is "the same." That mindset is disrespectful and dehumanizing. Respect the individuality and autonomy of every provider
-
0 pointsI actually have an entire thread already posted that explains how to properly screen a provider before booking her. Nowhere have I said to blindly book someone whose ad seems too good to be true. At some point, clients need to take responsibility for their own choices and safety. Iâve also said Iâm not against reviews, as long as theyâre done tastefully, respectfully, and not written like porn scripts. Some providers prefer a no-review policy, and that should be respected too. But there are plenty of ways to screen someone before seeing them. Hereâs the link: https://www.lyla.ch/topic/214084-how-to-screen-an-indĂŠpendant/ The issue I raised is not about reviews. Itâs about the disrespect of asking whether a woman is "worth it" just because she charges more or calls herself elite. This thread wasnât a review of one person. It was a collective complaint targeting women who charge higher rates, an entire group of professionals being questioned for valuing themselves. As I said before: if you want to know if someone is "worth it," book her. Then leave a classy, respectful review. But dragging women publicly because their rates donât match your expectations? Thatâs not feedback, itâs entitlement.
-
Newsletter