Star - 6267

[Sunny boy 4]

Has anyone seen her?? 
https://www.leolist.cc/personals/female-escorts/nova-scotia/halifax_brand_new_girl-11178186

 

[Markwalburg 2]

I have met star multiple times now .  clean,friendly, no rush service. Always has a smile on her face and cracking jokes lol she is definitely worth the price she’s asking for. If I’m being honest I think she could be charging morre … I’m definitely going to be visiting her regularly . I recommend seeing her 

[stevenwilson 113]

yeah idk about that fresh review from a fresh new account LOL

[Jaxon 146]

21 minutes ago, stevenwilson said:

yeah idk about that fresh review from a fresh new account LOL

Agreed

[Markwalburg 2]

5 hours ago, stevenwilson said:

yeah idk about that fresh review from a fresh new account LOL

I’m not a fake account , star asked me to write her a review so I made this account. I’m sorry if now I made her look bad that was never my intention. She’s a very sweet girl

[Cjthomas 1608]

13 hours ago, stevenwilson said:

yeah idk about that fresh review from a fresh new account LOL

Weren’t you new once? The ego some of you have.To think you have the right to throw shade on any member who doesn’t align with your thinking or because their posts aren’t of a certain age. I’d be more questionable towards people like you whose comments are always negative towards the locals here and only positive towards those travelling. What’s your motive? Have you noticed lately that all these best of posts are made by new members. Yet  there’s no questioning towards their posts or motives. That I find interesting. I’ve said it before, this forum needs renaming. As it’s more comedy than discussion .Some of you never disappoint.

[MsManda 25949]

1 hour ago, Cjthomas said:

Weren’t you new once? The ego some of you have.To think you have the right to throw shade on any member who doesn’t align with your thinking or because their posts aren’t of a certain age. I’d be more questionable towards people like you whose comments are always negative towards the locals here and only positive towards those travelling. What’s your motive? Have you noticed lately that all these best of posts are made by new members. Yet  there’s no questioning towards their posts or motives. That I find interesting. I’ve said it before, this forum needs renaming. As it’s more comedy than discussion .Some of you never disappoint.

Right? 

 

We claim to want more activity here, which also requires new members to be active, yet they get shat on for posting 🤦

 

 

[Skilled Hands 191]

On 2/13/2026 at 9:43 AM, Cjthomas said:

Weren’t you new once? The ego some of you have.To think you have the right to throw shade on any member who doesn’t align with your thinking or because their posts aren’t of a certain age. I’d be more questionable towards people like you whose comments are always negative towards the locals here and only positive towards those travelling. What’s your motive? Have you noticed lately that all these best of posts are made by new members. Yet  there’s no questioning towards their posts or motives. That I find interesting. I’ve said it before, this forum needs renaming. As it’s more comedy than discussion .Some of you never disappoint.

Say it louder for the people in the back. 

[Coco1 106]

Well sorry to burst anyone's bubble here, but stevenwilson and jaxon were bang on, Markwalburg has to be a fake. 
 

Against my better judgement I paid her a visit today and I landed in the midst of a disgusting drug den. To call the place a pig sty would be an insult to pigs. The place was a filthy mess and the girl looks like she's been on a bad drug bender for months. I handed her a $20 for her troubles and fled fast as I could. 

[BenDover 337]

15 minutes ago, Coco1 said:

Well sorry to burst anyone's bubble here, but stevenwilson and jaxon were bang on, Markwalburg has to be a fake. 
 

Against my better judgement I paid her a visit today and I landed in the midst of a disgusting drug den. To call the place a pig sty would be an insult to pigs. The place was a filthy mess and the girl looks like she's been on a bad drug bender for months. I handed her a $20 for her troubles and fled fast as I could. 

what area ?  you can usually tell these places from the street / address 

 

[Skilled Hands 191]

1 minute ago, BenDover said:

what area ?  you can usually tell these places from the street / address 

 

 

18 minutes ago, Coco1 said:

Well sorry to burst anyone's bubble here, but stevenwilson and jaxon were bang on, Markwalburg has to be a fake. 
 

Against my better judgement I paid her a visit today and I landed in the midst of a disgusting drug den. To call the place a pig sty would be an insult to pigs. The place was a filthy mess and the girl looks like she's been on a bad drug bender for months. I handed her a $20 for her troubles and fled fast as I could. 

That breaks my effing 💔 

[Skilled Hands 191]

On 2/13/2026 at 11:37 AM, MsManda said:

Right? 

 

We claim to want more activity here, which also requires new members to be active, yet they get shat on for posting 🤦

 

 

Ms Manda we may have to eat crow on this one 

[MsManda 25949]

9 hours ago, Skilled Hands said:

Ms Manda we may have to eat crow on this one 

Nah the principle remains the same.. We still can't bully (new) members if we want more activity here

 

I didn't claim to know who is a fake acct or not 🤷 

[Cjthomas 1608]

I think questioning any post is an incumbent aspect of doing one’s research. As is using one’s intuition along with reading a members post history, if they have any. In saying that, a members post history isn’t a validation or an invalidation to them being reliable, honest or accurate. We all get to choose who and what we believe. Yet if you want this forum to have credibility and thrive then posting sarcastic assumptions, throwing shade towards and mocking long standing or new members isn’t the way to go. 

[DaveM2 207]

The reason this board is dead is because every thread devolves into this same tedious tone policing exercise. This thread is a perfect example, you have a painfully obvious shill review, somebody points that out, then they get attacked for it. Then somebody else decides to take the chance, and confirms its fake. Then the people who were wrong double down and still insist they were right somehow, because its about the tone he used rather than the content of the message. Most of us are on here to get accurate info, its far preferable to have a small community of actual real clients than a large community of fakes. And personally, I would rather talk with somebody who is mildly rude (i think thats a stretch honestly but whatever) but gives good advice than someone who is polite but convinces me to go into a drug den.

[NSGuy14 1268]

You're both right, and that's ok in this case (except for the drug den part, wtf!!). 

 

As DaveM2 indicated, the post had big scammy vibes.  I dismissed it immediately, as did many others, likley.  It coming from a new poster was an obvious red flag, among others. 

 

But to CJT's point, everybody needs to start at "1".  It's the job of each of us to determine how much trust we put in new members. But for real, that one definitely read as scammy.

[addictedone 188]

If you want review board credibility as a newbie, don’t start with an overly positive review of an SP never reviewed before (and claiming she should and could be charging more…WTF?). This rule of thumb should be added to the newbie guide and there should be an entrance exam before you are permitted to write your first review on this forum. 

[addictedone 188]

14 hours ago, BenDover said:

what area ?  you can usually tell these places from the street / address 

 

The name of the area begins with an S and ends with a d. 

[Cjthomas 1608]

1 hour ago, DaveM2 said:

The reason this board is dead is because every thread devolves into this same tedious tone policing exercise. This thread is a perfect example, you have a painfully obvious shill review, somebody points that out, then they get attacked for it. Then somebody else decides to take the chance, and confirms it’s fake. Then the people who were wrong double down and still insist they were right somehow, because it’s about the tone he used rather than the content of the message. Most of us are on here to get accurate info, it’s far preferable to have a small community of actual real clients than a large community of fakes. And personally, I would rather talk with somebody who is mildly rude (i think thats a stretch honestly but whatever) but gives good advice than someone who is polite but convinces me to go into a drug den.

I apologize for not having the time to read all the posts as you’ve claimed to have done, so I can’t comment to your opinion as to why this board is dead. As far as me being wrong, what was I wrong about? That new members should be given a chance or that Stevens posts are redundant in their negativity? I never claimed that the posters recommendation was valid or invalid. I made the point that a members validity shouldn’t be solely based on their join date and to automatically write them off because they are new is unfair. If you see that as an attack or doubling down then perhaps you’re too sensitive and biased to be here. If any poster can convince you to see someone  just because they say you should might be another reason this forum isn’t for you. I think it’s best for anyone to do their own research and take the opinions of others with a grain of salt. Unless of course you have a way of confirming the validity of a poster aside from meeting them in person,  that you’d like to share.