Leaderboard

Hey Cleo, I'm so glad you had fun, and I think you did a wonderful job as an interviewee... I can honestly say that it's one of the best segments I've ever had on the show, and I've heard from quite a few people who think it's the best interview we've ever done on Sex Brains & Money. I've always said that, if people knew what the sex industry was really like, there wouldn't be nearly as much stigma and the stereotypes wouldn't be nearly so pervasive. That's part of the reason I wanted to start the show in the first place, and I'm really happy that you were able to share a different perspective on what being a sex worker is all about. Just a little confession - you looked so hot during the segment that I almost forgot the questions at least a couple of times, and I had trouble keeping the proper distance! ;) Luckily my professionalism helped me overcome my naughtier thoughts, otherwise it would have ended up being a very different kind of video! :p For everyone who checked out the segment, and commented on this thread, thank you so much for your positive feedback - I'm really looking forward to doing more segments like this in the future, perhaps with other SPs who'd like to join me as well. Also, if there are any clients who are feeling particularly bold, and might want to join me for a segment, let me know! I'd love the chance to help the public realize that stereotypes about clients are just as false as those about sex workers, and I think it would make for a really great interview to talk about why you enjoy seeing these lovely ladies. Just a thought, anyways. :) Thanks again everyone, and if you'd like to know more about the show, check out www.sexbrainsmoney.com for all the details, and all the other segments as well. :)

Just kidding! But I did recently have the great pleasure of meeting the lovely Nikki Thomas and of being interviewed on her show 'Sex, Brains and Money'. Hope you like it!

Love this! Seriously, as long as she gives you her all, who cares how many people she sees?

Well, I can't comment on that without knowing what the problems are supposed to be, and how frequent they are, and what the evidence is for either a statistical or a causal link between that and vaccination. From the links you provided, they appear to be the standard bunch of conspiracy-theorists. Do you have any links to any peer-reviewed studies on this? So... what? There's money in healthcare? The companies that make drugs are profit-making corporations? This isn't news. FWIW, vaccination isn't anywhere close to being the biggest sector of the market - that goes to treating the chronic diseases of the affluent and aging West. Have a look at which drugs really rake in the $$$... they aren't vaccines. Of course it's plausible. Why do you think drug licensing exists? Why do you think new drugs aren't allowed to be sold without approval? This isn't just bureaucracy for the sake of it. It has no purpose other than to combat this tendency. Unfortunately, this is where the conspiracy-theorists demonstrate their utter lack of understanding of how science works. They equate "plausible" with "proven". If you're going to do that, please remember that your arguments, such as they are, are equally valid when applied to the food you eat, the water you drink, and even the air you breathe. The fact that a company wishes to sell more of its products does not prove that those products kill people. Er... no. People who are well informed about science know damn well that it can be wrong, and sometimes is, and that the quest for knowledge is by no means over. They understand that not every paper or every author is trustworthy, or independent. That's why peer-review and the disclosure of conflicting interests are considered so critical. However, they also know that science, imperfect as it is, is vastly better than unproven rumour. I won't deny that this has happened. But again, this is what the conspiracy theorists get so wrong: they fail to see the difference between "it happened once" and "it happens all the time". Which is why it's important to look at the data and the methodology, of course. "so many"? I'd dispute your characterization of that. You seem to have conflated two things here. The first is the normal progress of science: since you did statistics at university I'm sure you'll appreciate the vast improvement in knowledge provided by the millions of samples we get from real-life use of a drug, rather than the few hundred that exist in a clinical trial. Yes, giving a new drug to more people enables us to find out more about it. If you want certain knowledge and absolute safety, you won't get it; there will be no further advances in medicine if we adhere to that impossible standard. Secondly, there's the cases where adverse findings are covered up. This is rare (I can't think of an example off the top of my head, although I know it's happened), and this isn't about science; it's about common-or-garden criminality. My sympathies to her. But I suspect your grandmother was more right about this than you... back when this happened, did they use a fresh, sterile needle for every new patient? Her calling it a 'dirty' needle may well be exactly correct. Like what? Please read my earlier explanation in this thread of how the 'flu virus works and why it sometimes doesn't, with particular reference to the existence of many 'flu strains and the problems of trying to predict which ones will be important a year in advance. It's not perfect; it's better than nothing. For the same reason that I also eat food that I have not personally grown and prepared. I think most of us do this. I trust the likes of the FDA and the CDC because I have no reasonable choice in the matter; I don't have time to learn how to prepare vaccines from scratch and actually do so. Neither do I have time to carry out clinical trials myself. Also, when I visit a restaurant, I don't stand in the kitchen and personally ensure that the chef washes his hands while he prepares my meal. I knocked this one down in a previous post. The reason for this is that they MUST, by law, report anything which is reported by patients who have had the vaccine. This includes symptoms reported by very small numbers. Or a cold. Which the patient may have already been incubating before they got the shot. And yes, it's possible that they did get these symptoms as a result of exposure to the dead virus in the vaccination... in which case I really dread to think what will happen to them when they're exposed to the real thing. I guess this is why 'flu has a mortality rate. Yes, that's why they always ask you to wait 15 mins after getting the vaccine before you leave. Er, no. You can look at the published evidence, and gauge its credibility. This is why the double-blind trial and peer-reviewed publishing are so important, why it's so important for researchers to declare conflicts of interest and funding sources, and why not all the 'data' you may find is equal. Which, incidentally, brings me back to the MMR vaccine/autism thing. I said in a previous post that the doctor who was responsible for this bit of junk science was banned from practice. Please note, however, that he wasn't banned for being wrong; people being wrong and having theories disproved is just part of the normal progress of knowledge. He was banned for funding conflicts of interest, for falsifying data, and for abuse of children in his care. Trust the corporation? Of course not. But as I explained earlier, I do trust that they want to continue to be profitable. And I'm afraid I simply don't buy that everyone who works in the regulatory agencies has been completely bought up by the drug companies... although I guess this is why they're called "conspiracy" theories :) Er... ALL attempts at health improvement have a placebo effect. This is well understood. If you meant to say that 30% have no effect beyond the placebo... you may well be right - but please bear in mind that "attempts at health improvement" also includes things like magic crystals and homeopathy. While I'm on the subject, note that the FDA and similar organizations don't just assess the safety of a new drug before licensing it; it won't be licensed unless it's safe AND effective. That's why they don't approve many things that simply do no harm. This is pretty much par for the course for the conspiracy theorists, alas. Sure you can! Welcome to the Internet!

And did you notice how vague it was? This is entirely deliberate. The tricky thing about making a commercial vaccine is making sure that it remains useful for a reasonable lifetime between the factory and the clinic. Most of those weird-sounding ingredients are preservatives and stabilizers, rather than things that have any biological effect. And some of those ingredients, and the cocktails of them that are used, are jealously-guarded commercial secrets, which is why the CDC don't get to publish (or possibly even know) the details of them. So, to answer the obvious next question: we know they're safe because of the clinical trials that are run. They've been tested in humans under controlled conditions; before that they were thoroughly tested in animals (I know many people don't like the idea, but it's the law) and before anything even gets as far as a lab cockroach it's been extensively tested for effectiveness and toxicity on cell cultures. They don't want to, no. But they have to :) The companies you mention, like all publicly-traded companies, are ultimately responsible to their shareholders. That means they need to make money. And they don't make money by letting their customers die, or by screwing up and producing unsafe products that result in their customers suing them. They make money by selling their customers a product that works, so those customers (that's us, by the way) can survive to buy more of their products in the future. They don't sell us working medical products because they're nice, or altruistic; they do it because that's where their profits come from. They don't invent new drugs out of a sense of social responsibility or charity; they do it because they want to continue to be profitable. I wouldn't, because I don't think anything fundamental has changed. What HAS changed is that these things are far more widely recognized and better understood than in the past, and therefore now diagnosed far more often. It's not that more kids have autism or ADHD today; it's just that they're actually being diagnosed with these conditions and helped, rather than just labelled as "a bit weird" or "an absolute little shit". I consider this to be a thoroughly good thing. And since you've raised this in the context of a thread about vaccination, I really must take the time to mention that the link between the MMR vaccine and autism that was publicized a lot in the UK (and elsewhere) has been completely debunked. It's bullshit. It always was, despite the scaremongering. The doctor who kicked the whole shitstorm off has been barred from practicing medicine as a result of his dishonesty. If you genuinely believe that there's any kind of link between the conditions you mentioned above and any vaccine, please do share the evidence. I'd be very interested to see it. No, they don't. Quite the opposite, in fact. We are all exposed to far fewer viruses and other pathogens than in the past, and one of the big reasons for this is that vaccination exists, and it works. Provided enough people take advantage of it to eliminate the breeding-grounds for disease, of course. A small amount of dead 'flu virus put into your arm is a lot less of a viral load than exposure to someone who's succumbed to the real thing. The allergies thing is fascinating, and one of the problems with it is that nobody really has a clue what's happening. Yes, allergies seem a lot more common. We don't know why. However, I don't propose to derail this thread to discuss it... but if you start another one I'll see you there :) No, people are not sicker now... and no, it's not up for debate. Look at the statistics. Look at mortality rates and life expectancies. The numbers don't lie. We are healthier for longer than ever before. Please bear in mind that one of the big reasons so many of us die of cancer or heart disease at eighty is that we didn't die of polio or smallpox at ten, and that's because of vaccination. There have certainly been many changes. But they're not all bad. As I explained previously, this decision doesn't just affect you personally. It affects the society you live in. Also, if you're really concerned about these things, don't ever read the labels on the food you eat, or the bottles of stuff you put on yourself in the bathroom. Just to return to that CDC list: did you happen to notice how many of those exotic-sounding ingredients are also in your food? Preservatives and stabilizers aren't just useful for keeping vaccines fresh. If you're serious about not putting these things into your body, I'd recommend that you quit modern society and move to a hunter-gatherer or subsistence-farming lifestyle. The problem of how to fund our aging population is undoubtedly a tricky one... and again, a subject for another thread. It has nothing to do with vaccination.

Perhaps this page might be useful? http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html

I never thought about this until I saw other providers posting in their ads-I'm not a revolving door, refering to high volume as a bad thing. Perhaps this is why some men may think this as well. Really making any assumptions about this business and those in it is not a good idea as eveyone works, advertises,charges, plays differently. There are many days I've put up an ad then decided not to work, there are days when I don't have to advertise because I've been booked ahead of time. Some days I'll see 3 men other days 1. Some nights 2 some 4. It all depends on my energy levels, horniness and wether or not I have things going on in my personal life. I don't like it when anyone presumes that because someone advertises on "lesser" sites, once a day or once a week, perhaps isn't as articulate as some, is older, younger, has a little or alot of reco's, that they may be this or that. After all you never know someone until you meet them, experience them and hear their story, even then there may be more to learn. Everyone deserves a chance to blossom in their own way and do" this" their own way, without criticism and assumptions.

I apologize for the links. It was late last night when I came upon this thread and I didn't have any handy.. although I should save them up. This discussion comes up every year. I have gotten lazy and relied on mercola.com and the site was down for maintenance last night. Also the problem with some of the articles I provided linked to sites that had moved pages.. this time I checked many of the links and they're current. So.. here we go. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/05/15/australia-bans-flu-vaccine.aspx toddler dies less than 12 hrs after vaccination. Several others have been admitted to hospital with convulsions in Australia. http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/toddler-ashley-jade-epapara-2-dies-after-flu-vaccination/story-e6freon6-1225857803417 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17701480 http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/10/31/flu-vaccination-epa-safety-limit-for-mercury.aspx http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/08/more-proof-flu-shots-dont-work.aspx http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/06/24/swine-flu-experts-were-paid-by-drug-companies.aspx There are no peer-reviewed double-blind studies available that the flu vaccine works. It's a crap-shoot every year. They take the top 3 possible major offenders to make each new vaccine. If that were it.. I wouldn't have such a problem with the concept. It's actually homeopathic in nature. However homeopathics are made with either alcohol preps or lactose powder. Vaccines are inserted via needle (or occasionally nasal spray - the live version) and use several very toxic preservatives. The claim on the preservatives already mentioned is that the does are extremely small. They're big enough for me. I wouldn't in my right mind inject formaldehyde, mercury, msg etc into my body any more than I would knowingly ingest it. This is enough for my already sensitive immune system to have damage to cause a weakening to create a cold, flu or worse. That is the main issue for me. You may not find the articles helpful. Long are gone the days where I'm going to go the trouble of researching a paper directly myself to prove what I already believe and know. Again that's the crux of it. You can't back up what you know and believe by saying the links don't support the evidence.. but you conveniently ignore the claims of deaths I provided.. Not important enough to consider? I know.. that's hard to prove too eh? soooo many people are coming forward claiming within days that their kids have developed autism.. never mind that one scientist evidence was nullified. Same is true with HPV.. The flu vaccine may not have the same severity..but there are so many other ways to prevent getting the flu.. take care in what you eat (and actually I do prepare virtually all of my own food at home.. rather than eat out), make sure you're getting enough vit D, there are several herbs you can take.. I can spend some time searching more articles.. but the movies are easier. In north america we have the highest incidence of cancer in the world. Cancer is a huge money making industry. View http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/pre-2007/files/health/cancer/ Wendy Mesley did an expose after getting cancer and getting her blood tested for several toxins she was surprised to have in her blood. Here's an interesting link from the same site on where to look for common carcinogens in what you eat and use in your everyday household products http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/pre-2007/files/health/cancer/whatyou.html actually.. that reminds me. A few years ago I heard on the radio that Harper (and I forget who else. McGuinty?) had blood tests that showed several of the same toxins and then never heard a thing about it. I couldn't and still can't find a shred of this online. Anyone know where it is? We all have them. If people really understood how poisoned we are they'd be up in arms. Media won't allow it. Watch for aspartame (speaking of Donald Rumsfeld's involvement in another great toxic scheme) a movie called sweet misery: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0UDeydlEDM the flu vaccine is not an exception the pharmaceutical drug cartel industry.. it's the norm. As for the above mentioned monsato issue.. it's paramount right now. oh yeah.. and then there's the fluoride issue.. several documentaries about both of them right now. GMO and fluoride are banned in several other countries.. not because there are few conspiracists out there like me.. but because they woke up! genetic roulette.. on GMO's (but there are several other movies out now) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ao_Hs2nNQDA Additional Comments: well now! this is extremely interesting to me. It was mentioned the Dr. Andrew Wakefield was debunked re: MMR and autism. I urge you all strongly to watch this video... called Selective hearing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fusaNwT22iQ

I was looking for a new adventure last night, and I was pleasantly surprised! I tried new girl Thalia who has been advertising on BP and DL. The agency that she works for were very professional and answered all of my questions. Thalia works outcalls only and arrived on time (a big plus for me). My first very pleasant surprise is that she looks exactly like her photos (kudos to her agency - I hate fake photos). It didn't take long for us to get comfortable and chatty. She's very interesting - not shy at all, and was very good at setting me at ease (I'm not immediately trustful of new people). Conversation soon turned to some of the most affectionate making out I've ever had from an SP. Guys, Thalia is a great kisser! Even if she may be acting - she's very natural. This evolved into a really nice massage - her fingers are magic! It also helps that she likes to kiss every inch as she goes. Thalia gets as good as she gives, and loves to be touched and kissed - she told me that she really enjoys the attention. Sex was unrushed, and she likes to vary the tempo from soft GFE style to intense, spank my ass, talk dirty to me you bad boy! We had no problem using up our whole hour, and Thalia does not seem to be a clock watcher. It was a joy to give her a tip, and she's almost as much fun to watch get dressed as get undressed. She's VERY clean, smells great, and does absolutely everything she can to make sure that I felt like THE MAN. In short - Highly Recommended

With Donald Rumsfeld having a stake in marketing a flu "remedy" to as many people as possible, I'm leery of any corporate involvement in flu prevention/treatment. That guy's scary! And yes, I know Tamiflu is not a vaccine, but it's in the flu vein, so what the hell. Donald Rumsfeld makes $5m killing on bird (swine, etc.) flu drug I'll trust Mother Nature before I trust megacorporations: Madre Labs, Immune Punch with AHCC and Epicor I think the corporation is one of the biggest threats facing our existence (Monsanto with PCBs & glyphosate & GM foods, TEPCO with a nuclear disaster worse than Chernobyl which is still ongoing, etc.). But there are probably too many of us humans on the planet anyway, and sooner or later Mother Nature will cull us down to a manageable size with some crazy new hyper flu which science will be helpless against, and when it's time for me to be culled, pass me the bottle and let's go! ;-)

Mowed the lawn last weekend, and after doing so I sat down and had a couple nice cold beers. The day was really quite beautiful, and the brew facilitated some deep thinking on various topics. Finally I thought about an age old question: Is giving birth more painful than getting kicked in the Nuts? Women always maintain that giving birth is way more painful than a guy getting kicked in the nuts. Well, after another beer, and some heavy deductive thinking, I have come up with the answer to that question. Getting kicked in the nuts is more painful than having a baby; and the reason is simple. A year or so after giving birth, a woman will often say, "It might be nice to have another child." On the other hand, you never hear a guy say, "You know, I think I would like another kick in the nuts." I rest my case.......

Both of those articles don't have any outside supporting documentation. They contain links to other articles on the same website, except for one that links to yahoo, which when followed is a broken link. You can't make a claim and support it with another made-up claim, unless it is purely anecdotal. At some point there needs to be factual evidence to back it up, or it's not credible.

This kind of thread upsets me.. because people who think they are well informed about science believe it can't be wrong... when it's often manipulated to make sure that drugs get passed through the FDA that aren't fit for consumption never mind safe. I learned early on in my university days when studying in my statistics course how you could skew data easily to make an outcome in your favor. Why do you think so many FDA drugs are approved only later to be proven unsafe and so many drug companies sued as a result. More and more whistle blowers come forward all the time at great personal and professional expense whilst many stay silent. Follow the money trail. Thankfully the internet has disseminated more information that you can be lead more often to the truth. But to quote some people on here who denigrate those who are anti-vaccine as blindly being led.. I feel exactly the same way about you. re: small pox vaccine. My paternal grandmother was blinded by it.. and also given shingles. You may think it's a small price to pay for her 'dirty' needle as she called it. I sure don't. You may not get the flu from the flu vaccine but you sure as hell can get a lot of other illnesses from it. AND that's not even true. Many many peope will tell you they have only gotten the flu after receiving the vaccine. THe standard answer to that is that it's a killed vaccine and you just received it too late. I say hogwash. Stopped getting the vaccine and haven't gotten the flu since. You who take it.. do so blindly on pure 'faith' that those who have made it have your best interests at heart. I see more 'faith' there than I do in religious zealots. Why would you take it unless you sat there and watched how it was made?? yikes! That's a hell of a lot of trust. But then again.. you must trust the FDA and CDC. I know I sure don't. google HPV vaccine deaths.. there are plenty. More and more evidence to support autism as a result of vaccination. SAFE? hell no.. neurological disorders from swine flu vaccine.. http://www.garynull.com/home/terra-daily-finland-vows-care-for-narcolepsy-kids-who-had-sw.html http://www.naturalnews.com/033816_swine_flu_vaccines_neurological_disorders.html also note on the CDC website.. trying to cover their butts no doubt. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/vis/downloads/vis-flu.pdf state that mild symptoms may include fever, aches, cough, headache..hmm. sounds pretty similar to a flu to me! Life-threatening allergic reactions from vaccines are very rare. If they do occur, it is usually within a few minutes to a few hours after the shot. oh.. well in that case.. stay close to the hospital.. just in case eh?

Well now that Jason has opened the floor to sarcastic smilies...

I like when you say the word "fuck". Hot.

http://www.informedchoice.info/cocktail.html Heres a link of whats in the most common vaccines.. Call me crazy, but I am not convinced that billion dollar drug companies have my personal best interest in mind when they are trying sell me on the idea of having antifreeze , fermeldahide, aluminum along with other well known neurotoxins.. And then using scare tactics and public fear to pressure uninformed people into believing that they need their drugs..

Hi all, ... saw this on CL in the Therapeutic section on two separate occasions (the first one I was is down already) with no contact info except for the CL email ... Essentially late night massage (after 9pm) and it looks straightforward but I emailed twice (a week apart) and got no response . Is it spam or someone just phishing for email addresses ? Does anyone have any info ? thanx nominis

hypothetically Speaking, because this has never happened /wink wink. If you had a date set up and for some reason you had a feeling you where not going to be able to preform is a hardener helper at all wrong? Would a SP want to know your on some enhanced meds before you get there or say something when you arrive? I suppose it wouldn't be wrong, but when would you want it to kick in? Would you want to walk thru a door saluting the flag, or would you want it to kick in 20 minutes after getting there? Not that it should be taken to pound away for the full duration of the visit, that would just get boring and probly get you a 1 way ticket to "NO" for a repeat date imo. floors open for discussion, really curious to opinions and or experiences.

I was just in one of the local shopping centres here in Ottawa and I was sickened to see multiple stores putting up their Christmas stocks/decorations/advertisements. When did Christmas start in the middle of November, let alone October? It's getting utterly rediculous. Not only are we encroaching on Remembrance Day, Hallowe'en has now been erased by the most "loved to hate" season of the year! C'mon men, what man has ever truely had a "Merry" Christmas? We've had tolerable ones, ok ones, even entertaining ones. Is there anyone who really wants to see actual Christmas displays in October? I for one am sick of it and I am making it a point to speak to the managers of all the stores that start this early and informing them that I won't be shopping there for the coming year. I hope you will all join me. End public rant. Slammer Posted via Mobile Device

I accept the premise that if someone should not assume that someone who advertises a lot is a "high volume provider" or anything like that. But is it any of my business, if I would prefer to see a lady that doesn't see many people, to consider that if she advertises that? Heck yes!!! That is a decision I can make based upon that factor, or whether I like their ad, their postings on cerb, their photos, their dress, lipstick, cologne, etc., etc., etc.. And I do prefer to see ladies that limit their visits because for me ... personally ... I have had much better visits with ladies that dont see many clients per day. Frankly, I have had some downright bad experiences, in years past, especially with agencies that seem to move their ladies through visits with all the subtlety of a busy airport. Whether a lady chooses to advertise that she is a low volume, or high volume for that matter, provider, or remains silent on the issue is their own choice, and I respect that. And it certainly will never be the only factor, but I consider it a plus.

Well, HD66, I can only say that your public posts are very revealing. You haven't been on this site long enough maybe to understand why both the sps and the clients use this site, as opposed to review sites. On this board or behind the scenes, there is no reason to tell anyone at all about services that are not advertised, especially if they are not offered to all. There is in fact a very good chance this reliable source is lying to you, whether it is you providing the info or receiving it. You say you book based on back room information, but the sp herself did not offer, advertise nor agree to have the info shared, but you will expect to receive it when you show up, otherwise you wouldn't book her based on her advertised services, only the rumoured ones? And you don't see the conflict in that, plus you want to justify not just doing it, but expecting others to agree lol. Every time someone tells another potential client about an sp providing services she doesn't want known publically, or doesn't want to be asked about or doesn't want to have to provide to everyone who shows up, they are telling those guys her wishes are unimportant. They are telling her that he is indiscreet and a gossip. It makes him unattractive as a client, and chances are if she finds out, and she will find out the minute guy #2 acting on info given to him by pm, contacts her and asks for or about it. It is really up to the client to do his own work, contact the sp and allow her to answer, privately and only 'first hand' what his real expectations on arrival should be. It isn't up to a 3rd person to disclose 2nd hand information about what he claims happened. We have no insight as to the circumstances around getting or not getting certain services, advertised or not. We don't know if they were coerced, tricked, paid extra, freely offered, or even if they were offered or received at all. We don't know the source has an axe to grind, or is just super special and unique that he gets what others are denied.

In Ottawa for example, because there are so many SPs, sometimes we may post that we are available say from 9 am until 6 pm, but that does not mean we are busy the entire time. I am a low volume provider and sometimes I have to be available 12 hours in order to get 1 or 2 calls. So, I agree. Don't make assumptions.

Does anyone here own a Vitamix blender? If so, how do you find it? Any problems to speak of?

- I never considered frequent ad posting or shout outs a quantity booking thing but more of a smart marketing idea and also a timing thing...I know very well many of you gals are studying hard ;) or have jobs. For me your frequent posts and shout outs tell me more about you and your personalities and what you like ... this = me wanting you that much more :) - High volume doesn't concern me in the slightest.... I just don't want to meet the next guy at the door. - SEX IN PERSONAL LIFE !! That exists ??? ha ha My assumption Nat ! - by the way you post and shout out you are an intelligent, remarkable, sexy, frisky and energetic young lady that I would luv luv luv to spend time with.....and I don't care who and how many you were with before me. It's all about you and me when we are together.

Great thread Nathalie, The posting of ads or shout out could be simply as you say, getting per-bookings and set a schedule, that should be done as a provider, it shows to myself a organized individual once contact is made that she has set her schedule and is proactive about it. The other marketing tool used " is a web site " I venture to say there is more than 85% of ladies that have one, on the site is her " schedule" especially if it is updated regularly. I have no issue about the higher/lower volume of clients a lady might say other than this, IF she is to entertain 8 clients in a day, she really does need the mental break in between, plus the time for her to get ready/hygiene complete for next visitor. Yes sex is great and yes it is none of my business of how many she may see in a day, but if she is offering in calls the issue becomes a discretion issue with a steady flow of traffic that may lead to noisy neighbours or possibly LE. There is so many ways of marketing for ladies today, to get in contact with her, web sites,boards,cell phones, it is an actual bonus, when I started seeing ladies I was using a pay phone, and they were accepted calls, today they are not ( is there still pay phones around ?) now we have a shout box for quick contact. It's all good, and as they say never "assume" .

I agree! And this also includes clients speaking negatively about their wives or ex-wives and how they are such a bitch. It's really none of my business and it just makes the client look bad and how much lack of respect they have for women. Just sayin...

Eight more stinking yard waste bags to continue the battle of cleaning up the leaves. My property is always clean just wished the lazy ass neighbour get off his arse and clean up his leaves!

I love kissing almost as much as sex! Passionate kissing is a must for any girl I'm with.

I didn't say I believed he was LE, just that because he had done nothing but lurk for six years, I had no idea what he was like and could even be LE for all I knew. If had a posting history, I could form some kind of opinion about him. Besides, it's not just him. There are lots of brand new members whose first posts are requests for info to be sent to them via PM. There's no way they'll ever get that from me until they've posted for a while. Additional Comments: I take it you've never read a review board, as opposed to a recommendation board. If you advertise a service, you should expect clients to share information about it. Besides, if I share details of my experience with a lady, whether in public or via PM, how is that gossip? It's only gossip if we spread information that is not first hand. Since you seem so concerned about "discretion", shouldn't you be happy that some clients only share via PM? Also, on CERB, we're not even allowed to post publicly about crappy service from SPs, unless they're obvious ripoffs. So, we often have to resort to PMs to share important information.

and tell me you wouldn't like to be between any of these ladies ;) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAjFoVLW680&feature=related

In all likelihood, what I'm about to mention as a subject to avoid has already been addressed. However, reminders always serve a purpose, and some things bare repeating. I think it's incredibly important to avoid talking negatively about other providers when you're with someone. Although I'm fine with a patron speaking positively about other providers, I don't want details about your experience. It's none of my business. I recognize comparisons happen at times, but they shouldn't be vocalized during an encounter and I don't find it flattering to be compared to other ladies in the business. I much rather be judged by my own merits. I know it happens, and when you click with someone it's normal to want to share your experiences with them, but please keep in mind that this is an incredibly small industry. In all likelihood, you're talking about one of my friends. How awkward!

The snow and winter is here !!! Any of you ladies wanna frolick in the snow ??

Really great advice. Hormones never 'cause' anything, they simply enhance what's already there. Being stressed, distracted, or depressed can definitely cause some problems... I think it's great if you're able to have an open and honest conversation with your provider about why that might be happening. This not only creates a safe space for you to (perhaps) move past any anxiety or stress, but it also reassures the provider that there isn't something she should be doing differently. Cialis and Viagra will definitely not give you an uncontrollable instand hard-on. I personally don't think it's necessary to tell your provider your taking medication unless you think it's relevant and want her to know for whatever reason.

It is not how someone looks but it is bad hygeine that's just an overall mood killer and not to mention nauseating. Basic hygeine is essential and if you expect us to be freshly showered and clean, I expect the same in return.

Very true but when men get kicked in the nuts, it doesn't last for 9 months! ;)

It would not surprise me that probably 50% of clients over the age of 40 have prescriptions to ED meds like viagra, cialis or levitra. Frankly it's nobody's business should I choose to go that route; I would not feel any need to advise the sp that I had taken a blue pill prior our session. Not sure why it would matter, or why she would really care one way or the other.. Cialis or viagra will address the issue of bloodflow back from the penis, but it is NOT an aphrodisiac.. If you're stressed out, distracted or depressed, no amount of ED meds will give you an erection. Follow the instructions on the prescription. Usually, it will advise you to take it an hour before sexual activity; so, duh, take it an hour before your visit.. It is not going to give you an uncontrollable instant hard on, so don't fret about it..

Only happenned once to me. I answered "according to her profile, no but you can ask her any further questions(posts or PM), as long as you're respectfull she's friendly." Really not my place to spread info about a lady, except via recommandation and i don't get too explicite there. =p

Exactly my thoughts, Frank! Check out this story: Flu shot linked to higher incidence of flu in pandemic year Maybe the immune system is like our muscles or brain; it needs to be regularly exercised so that it's ready to tackle the big stuff when it comes along. I don't get sick very often, but when I do I just tough it out.

Ah, here we go, again. Jason, we got into this two years ago and I am not about to rehash the argument. If you want to believe whatever is out there on the internet, that's your choice. However that website lists very little documentation to support its claims, and it still lists the MMR vaccine as having a link to autism. Not the most scientifically accurate source of information.

Firstly I can't believe you actually read the list. Aspartame? MSG? It may give you a headache, (based on anecdotal evidence), but a one time shot causing long term effects? Not happening. Another great website from conspiracy theorists and crackpots who corrupt real science. Did you notice the reference to Small pox vaccine in that list? They couldn't get an adequate sample because it is not used anymore. Why? Because the vaccine basically eradicated what was a very contagious and virulent disease. Too bad these companies didn't have your best interests in mind.

This one as got beautiful abs but her hands are huge, judging by the size of her gloves and she only has 3 fingers and a thumb per hands.

7 am, i hop on the bus to get to work. A guy sits next to mebut smelling like he's been marinating overnight in perfume... wich gave me a major headache and my day isnt started yet!

My old cat puking up a couple of times today on the carpet. This is the fourth time I've had the steam cleaner out today! Poor cat is likely on his way out at the age of 16 :(

Hello gentlemen. I am a pregnant service provider, here, at your service. Juliexxx 613 816 1988

I can't speak to TV/home phone, but for internet, try Teksavvy.

As a male, I have to say that I find the "penetrative sex" rather boring too. I think most of the fun is in the foreplay! ;)

Because, of course, everyone knows that SPs only ever become more hygienic overnight, when they're visited by the SP-cleaning-fairy (who is the tooth-fairy's cousin, btw) and given a thorough overhaul and tune-up while they sleep. It's nothing to do with soap and mouthwash and mundane stuff like that. Oh no.

I have to say that whenever someone contacts me about my ad to ask for "more info" (usually all answered on my site) or to ask questions which have already been answered on my site or ad, it is a HUGEEEEE turn off! I try to remain positive as much as I can but it really irks me. Thank you to those who don't do this though, it makes me really happy and it automatically makes me feel that more comfortable with you if we're meeting for the first time! xo Sky