Leaderboard

While I understand we all have our own opinions....I strongly disagree with your statement, only because, I am an sp with ONE rec (been on here since November 2009)....and I do not believe its because I provide a shitty service and/or do not deserve one, because believe me...I DO!!! I truly think the reason for this is because a) the men I see do not bother with recs at all and/or b) are embarassed to post a rec which would indicate thier love for bigger ladies. I am able to back this claim up because I have quite a few friends from this site who have returned and/ or are ongoing. I realize my shape is not every one's cup of tea, so I fully admit my client base is smaller than most...BUT the clients I do see are happy, and highly doubt they are holding back on providing me with a rec because my service is whack...... I have learned to deal with this, because after all what I appreciate the most is when they return, and what I LOVE is the lovely notes they send to me privately, after it's all said and done :grin: Others have also said " if nothing is said on here about someone,it must be because there is nothing good to say' this too I feel is uncalled for, because it can give the impression that it's true, when clearly it is not. Not trying to be a Negative Nancy, so my apologies if I come off as rude. I just wanted to indicate the other side to why some ladies may not have any recs. Vanessa

I am overwhelmed that a majority of men who hang out on a review board are voting conservative. Not only the politician are hypocrites I guess! Did Leanna VIP provoked a new election... No, franchement. What did it?: 1. Limited access to information to journalists and public; 2. The Cons refusing to share important numbers with the elected members of Parlement; 3. The Cons wanting to make it a 'free market" the American style so that next time there is an economic crash, we really fall into a black whole with our neighbour down south. Why the Conservatives should not be elected: 1. For all of the above 2. For their crazy relationship with the Evangelist movement 3. For their wish to abolish gay equality 4. For their wish to limit abortion rights 5. For their wish to criminalize clients of sex workers 6. For their wish to lock up more and more citizens for minor crimes like drug possession and prostitution with your taxe money 7. For the G20 and all the crazy spendings and the powers that were giving to the police 8. Because Harper is an idiot - such as his team - seriously who wishes to be rule by people like Maxime Bernier, Bev Oda, Cops, Cops and more Cops, André Arthur and Gary Goodyear.... 9. Because before being a federal politician, Harper got to Supreme court of Canada to fight against public health, which he lost -thanks. 10. Because they have been found guilty of plenty of corruption and electoral fraud since they are in power 11. Because against police department wish all over Canada, they want to abolish the gun registry. 12. Because they like to create a bigger gap between the terrible big cities and a the real people living in the villages. 13. Because of their obsession over military. It is true that when some member of a party believe that gay equality is like terrorism for society, anything justify more and more money to defend yourself from all serious threats.................. I have an idea. Since I can't wait to be govern by a gang that will take us back to middle age, I will practice this weekend. Wou hou, i am so excited, !!! I will dress up like a Middle Age lady, I will invite all the neighborhood kids to act as if they were mine, I will play it submissive and dumb (you know, as if i had no education and could hardly read), I will go to the Church on Sunday than I will fake my death due to an abortion gone bad because you know, I had to do it myself cause it is not legal to do so.

When writing a pm, email or texting, please do not send one liners! Many times, it come across as being rude. Ive been on the recieving end of this threw txting, hence the reason why I do not text anymore to make a 1st appointment! WE can not hear your tone of voice, so when you send something like this: "WHEN CAN I SEE YOU?" It just sounds rude. First off, INTRODUCE yourself! Say hello, how are you, I am Mr.XXX. The reason why you are emailing or pm'ing: I am interested in meeting with you on this date and time for this long. A little about yourself, if your comfortable saying anything, some ladies actually request that you do, some don't. Then sign off... Looking forward to hearing from you, Until we meet, or what ever. When you write an actual pm or email, we WILL respond! When I see something that is not like the above described, I dont even want to put in the effort to respond, since you did not take the effort to say more than 3 or 4 words to me! And I am sure I am not the only lady that feels like that! And most importantly!! Read her Ads, website and profile!! They are very imformative. Hence the reason why we put so much effort into them! The effort your going to put in by pm'ing "Whats your rates?", "What time do you start?", or the big question, "What do you look like?" will be alot less than clicking your mouse on the link to her website/profile! You just look very lazy and disrespectful! We are not asking you to write an autobiography about yourself or a novel! 5-6 lines is not asking for much! I know some men are men of very few words, but if you cant take a few minutes to learn about us and say more then a few words, then imagin how we think the encounter will go with you?! Starting an email/pm politely can and will get you a better or if any encounter with your choosen SP/MA! ****************** I've searched and could not find a thread about etiquette on pm'ing, but found this thread, which only shows you how to START a pm: http://cerb.ca/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=15861 If I missed it someone let me know and Ill ask the Mod to add this post to it! Thanks, Tiffany Amber xoxo

Getting tired of etasman2000's corny one-liners ? Does seeing his PM in your Inbox give you a bad case of rash ? You can now do something! 1. Browse to the member's Profile page. (Search/Search Members) 2. Under the member's handle just beside Send Message is the User Lists drop down. Click on the User Lists and select Add to Ignore List 3. Click "Yes" and you are done. Alternative: 1. Click User CP on the top left hand corner of the Forum. 2. Under Settings & Options click on Edit Ignore List 3. Type in member's handle, partial matches will show a drop down list. Go ahead practice with etasman2000. 4. Click "OK" and you are done.

I've tried to avoid being drawn into this discussion, but I can't resist. There are so many issues, about tarsands, pipelines, and other environmental questions; about the dangers of social conservatism; about the contempt of Parliament, and about governmental irresponsibility; and on and on. The last straw was the CBC report about students being excluded from Con rallies because of the contents of their facebook pages. That degree of oversight and control terrifies me, for one. No thanks to the Cons.

I'm speculating somewhat here... but I do get the feeling there's more of this going on than most of us would care to admit to. Seriously, guys, we're not insecure fifteen-year-olds any more. Nobody is going to judge you on the basis of who you had a good time with, or what you did while having a good time with them. At least, not here. They might on other boards, but not here, from what I've seen.

God help us if these guys win a majority..... It was Bruce Carson, Bev Oda...... rather than Leanna (an easy target) that tarnished this conservative government. Not to mention the closed protected manner of campaigning and PM's refusal to answer reporters and kicking out two students, .....among other things. What else remains to be done to convince the nature of this government, to declare a martial law lol!!!!. Lol... The following list was so long it took my PC quite a while to load it lol (list of conservative scandals and misdeeds since they took office in 2006): http://exile.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/scandals-conservative-party-of-canada-2006-2011-always-under-construction/ God help us al if they win a majority lol!!!.

I can't see how dressing provacatively could be considered dressing like clowns? A huge part of this is dealing with the idea that how a woman can dress can effect the way she "deserves" to be treated. Posted via Mobile Device

I don't get the need for any sort of registration for anyone who provides sexual services. Only rules and zoning for businesses of importance size need these If someone can work from home as a researcher, a painter, an accounter, why not a independent provider? If one opens a big place, the owner registers his buisiness, not his employees. Why would he? Do bars register their waitresses, likewise for the resto? Hell no! Why us then? Great idea, let's abolish the gun registry and create a sex worker one instead! If we don't register, harper can throw us in one of his new jails. Why should i do time in jail if I don't register? Are the construction workers sent to jail when they work without permits? Hell no! Are they valuable reasons for a permit to work in the construction business? yes! Is there one for escorting? I can't find one! We don't need to change the laws, we need to abolish them. Just like New Zealand.

In Thunder Bay, the SP's here have their work name, and if someone else tries to use that name, they'll usually get a call saying that name is already in use. (unless its travelling girls) How does it work in other cities? is it the same thing? Or do girls add on to the name they want? or does it matter? just curious.

What do you do to relieve your stress and care for yourself? Lately, I've found that going out to a night club and dancing my butt off relieves so much stress and tension! I've decided to make it a weekly thing! Also, laughing my butt off works too, usually... Can't wait to hear about all of yours! Sky

I am sorry Shortcake but I beleive we don't get our information at the same place. The Liberals are the one who introduced it, not the PC. The PC platform for that last 6 years involves abolishing it. The NDP wants part of it to be abolish or part of it change. Harper was in Québec this week saying that if he has majority, it is one of the first thing he will do. It was saved lately because Layton could manage to convince some of his elected members to keep it. They were no "ligne de partie" to follow when they voted on that issue. If it costs so much, it should be relooked at to make it costs less but not abolish. I know that problems with arm won't all be solved with it but all cops association around Canada are saying that it does help them in their work and that it prevents casulties or death of both the population and the cops. For me, a gun is a gun, no matter if it can shoot 17 at a time or 1.

Pretty Angelic Shortcake Eats Treats :icon_smile: ASTRB

Good points, but I have a suspicion that if we come out with another Conservative Minority, Ignatieff will either step aside or be pushed by the Liberals, paving way for leadership convention (and everyone might remind Ignatieff that he has tried to distance himself from the idea of a Coalition during the campaign). I don't see the Liberals forming a Coalition without a leader. And Jack may also step aside for health reasons, allowing the NDP to look for some fresh blood. Besides, I think he's taken the NDP as far as he can. And even Mr. Harper's job may not be safe if he failed to lead the Conservatives to a majority in his third try. The Left is sufering from the same problem the right did during Jean Chretien's years. Chretien was elected to three consecutive majorities while conservative voters split their votes between the PC and Reform and then the PC and Alliance.

It would be nice if some people cleared their voice mail box when they have clients coming. Can't leave a message if its full. And if you know your going to be more than 10 minutes late give us a call.

If a politician isn't doing it to his wife, then he's doing it to his country. Amy Grant If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates. Jay Leno I love a dog. He does nothing for political reasons. Will Rogers Everything is changing. People are taking their comedians seriously and the politicians as a joke. Will Rogers Carry on, back to the thread folks ;)

This is me ... 30000. http://www.cerb.ca/vbulletin/member.php?u=30000

Liberal, Tory- Same old story.

The hypocrisy involved is that the Cons posed as the guardians of public morality, as if we've forgotten the Mulroney legacy, and now the new scandals, which ought to undermine their credibility.

Most definitely an interesting and well written article by Dan Gardner. I don't see fault in his presentation of the facts. I question, however, his assertion that the finding of contempt is not a political game. I'm of the opinion that a majority of Canadians consider the toppling of the government over this issue to be just that, political maneuvering. The fact that it is the first time that a commonwealth government has been found in contempt is likely more an indication of circumstance than anything else. This minority government was opposed by three parties who have considered toppling it a number of times, merely waiting for what they perceived to be the right time. Not many forget the coalition proposed between the Liberals, the NDP, the Bloc. Personally, I highly doubt that there were no transgressions of contempt by the sitting governments of Jean Chretien, Brian Mulroney or Pierre Trudeau. The major difference between those three prime ministers and today's being the majority benefit that they enjoyed. Doc.

Your time can intimate regardless if the lady is an Indy or working for an agency. I have seen a lady working for PK for 6 weeks, and the passion is there just as much if she was on her own, or in fact the same passion I have had with other Indy ladies. It takes 2 to tangle in the bedroom and make the time together worth while, it really does not matter if the lady works for an agency or herself. This can also can be said about visiting a MA who is own her own or going to a massage parlor to visit a lady, it is how you enjoy yourself with a lady, there is no real difference, other perhaps maybe location ie residence Vs. hotel. I like the reality of it, and that is the BEST OF BOTH WORLDS being able to see ladies that are independant or working for an agency.

I hope this is not for you because your breasts are perfect the way they are.

I live well outside any city. I have enough land to feed myself, and currently do produce a lot of my own food. I have enough food stored to eat for probably six months without leaving my house if I had to. I could survive if water or electricity was no longer provided. I have barterable items to use as currency in case of (the inevitable) collapse of the dollar. In other words, I'm the one everyone is going to come looking for if the shit hits the fan. And I'm prepared for that too.

super sexy, very artistic and very inviting!!!

This is the Capital of Canada, we will SlutWalk, proudly! On a side note, it really is too bad that some don't feel the relevance in SlutWalk Ottawa. I am going to try my best to stay positive and see that side as well, and as much as this is a forum of opinions and reviews we share..Some are up for discussion and some like this one should be supported in a positive light and left at that. SlutWalk, is a serious and meaningful event for everyone. See you there

The Ottawa police have the lowest rates in all of Canada for investigating sexual assault allegations. Last summer the Carleton University administration issued a statement on the rape of a student in 2007 saying that she should have taken precautions to ensure her own safety and therefore it was not the University's fault. Just a couple of months ago there was an incident in which the Ottawa Police called a 16-year-old girl's allegation of sexual assault a "hoax" Everyday in Ottawa, 50 women are turned away from women's shelters. Now, if the Slutwalk is not relevant in Ottawa, I don't know where it is relevant. As someone who works as a sexual assault support worker, I can assure you that this event is very relevant here. I can see how it's hard to make the connection here, but it's relevant nevertheless. Sky

This is the one that I was trying to post before which photobucket didn't like.

When I was a public servant, I spent the first hour of each day catching up on lolcats. I was very productive :b some of my faves:

Argh! See, this is why I know where my vote is going. The issues are being lost behind the deliberate misdirection about coalitions and election costs. Where do you think that $300million is spent? In our economy. Consider it a democratically motivated economic stimulus package. I hope the swell turns towards issues that actually matter instead of fictional boogeyman stories of impending coalitions, cost exaggerations and attack ads that quote without context stuff that was said three years ago. It's making a mockery of our political system. In case you haven't noticed, I'll be playing in the poll. ;)

There was one ting touched on in a previous post about the pay of MP's. Regardless of what one thinks, 155K is still pretty generous and more than any firefighter, police office, peace keeper or paramedic makes. Those are the people on the front who protect us and safe lives, often at their own peril. Personally, it turns my stomach a little to see any politican making more than a fire fighter who charges into a burning building to save a child or a police officer who has takes a bullet in the line of duty.

Personally I don't believe the Bloc, nor the PQ for that matter really want an independent Quebec. An independent Quebec would turn into a Third World country, but while a province of Canada, threatening independence, look at how the feds capitulate to alot of their demands. Quebec is more powerful as a province in Canada than as an independent country At least that's how I see it RG

I know for sure who I am Not voting for ! " a directive went out to public servants late last year that "Government of Canada" in federal communications should be replaced by the words "Harper Government.".... None would speak on the record for fear of retribution " :icon_eek: (fear of leader, In canada, Nah) His head is getting too big for his shoulders. Cult of Personality ? What's next ?, huge posters on the sides of bulidings of our great leader ??? http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Politics/20110303/harper-ruling-110303/