Half hour or one hour

[boomer01 5544]

Just wondering , setting aside the obvious donation difference , what you think about the proper amount of time for a first encounter . I'm traditionally a half hour kind of guy , for many reasons lol. I'd love to hear from both sides of the biz . Also after that initial encounter is it then more acceptable to do just a half hour. A lot can be accomplished in that time , and lastingvbeyond that duration can be tough especially at my age.

[Meaghan McLeod 179664]

My preference is always to start with the longer time for a first encounter. It gives us an opportunity to get to know each other. The ensuing encounters can be for a shorter time frame as we've already met.

[Exotic Touch Danielle 31677]

I totally agree with Meaghan....first time meeting should be a longer encounter to get a chance to not only enjoy each other but to get to know one another and build some type of chemistry... i do prefer an hour or more because it does give us more time but hey sometimes life happens and you only have a certain amount of time to meet....its whatever works for the both of you

[roamingguy 300291]

Well and speaking for me given the choice between 30 minutes or an hour, I'd go with a minimum of two hours...and I'm usually partial to three or four hours.

Encounters aren't about how long you can last. In fact with legalities in this day and age all it's about ;-) is time and companionship. So a longer encounter allows time to make a connection, time for conversation over drinks, maybe have dinner out etc etc etc.

So my two cents is for longer dates

 

RG

[EmilyRushton 253346]

I agree with the other ladies have posted, the fist date should be longer 60-90mins at least. It allows for time to getting to know one another as well as time for the date to flow. First dates can have some nerves that the extra time helps calm down and it also helps with knowing you can take time to relax.

[50 Shades Raven 31380]

Very much in agreement with the other ladies on this.

 

A half hour really isn't enough time to get to know someone, their likes/dislikes etc.

It's always been better for me when a first encounter with someone is an hour or longer.

 

Any further encounters can be in a shorter time frame, but really, think about it, how much can you really do in 30 minutes?

 

It's nice to chat, get into the mood, rather than just getting down to it.

[Guest **cely***r***ne]

As a first date I find it important to have more time. As suggested already it does allow for any nervousness to be calmed in order to be fully engaged. Personally I like to take my time and devour my guest..this can't really be done to my enjoyment (and yours too of course) in a short period of time.

 

However, I am not putting a shorter date down..after all I do understand some people are on time constraints, I just prefer to take our time.

[mrgreen760 37785]

30 minutes is my preference but will book an hour if I must but ready to split at about 45 minutes. I understand that from a fee basis longer bookings would be preferred or as some one put it to me recently....worth their while.

 

Peace

MG

[conquistador 18487]

For me, it would be 1hr to start and then go from there...30mins just seems rushed.

[Samurai 7678]

Well reviewed Gfe???...Min 1 hour for sure. Risky back page venture hoping for diamond in the rough but always risky???...1/2 hour.

 

That's always worked for me!!

[Midnite-Energies 110563]

Honestly, the only opinion that matters here is your own. You have to decide what you want from companionship and go from there. Some look for a connection so want a longer encounter (this can be both provider and client) and some are more about pleasure of the moment. If you prefer shorter encounters focused on pleasure alone, then you'll want to find someone who enjoys or caters to that as some do not. If you are looking for more, a connection, conversation, cuddling etc. than of course a longer appointment would fit the bill.

 

Only you can determine what your needs are. Good luck with your search.

[boomer01 5544]

I'm lucky in that I have met two very nice woman , both in their mid to late thirties on BP. Our sessions although labelled half hour really aren't governed by a clock. Sones sessions depending on me. ....lol.....can go 20 minutes and some can go 40 minutes. I love that flexibility that they both afford me. For us its an " encounter" not a specific time frame. Now in saying that I don't take anymore advantage than that but honestly I don't think they would mind as they both really enjoy themselves too.

I don't mean to generalize but I find ladies closer to my age tend not to be clock watchers.

I so love that , I know time is time and time is money but its about building a solid clientele built around mutual respect.

Do you agree ??

[NotchJohnson 214071]

I always take the 1 hour booking because I want to get to know the lady before we get down and dirty sort of speak. I have booked 2 hour with some ladies that traveled and were well reviewed and I was happy I did.

 

I have booked a 1hr session with a lady once from Montreal and believe it or not I was in and out in less then 15 minutes because she wanted to get things done fast. This is a completely other story.

 

So the deal is I always book a minimum of 1 hour when seeing a lady.

[someguy 67067]

Split the difference do the 45 minute options :)

 

http://www.lyla.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=64685

 

I usually do a 1 hr session with MA's and 45 minutes with companions as I find that time and budget just right for me.

[spud271 47779]

I always go for an hour. 30 minutes just feels to rushed for my liking. An hour gives me way more time to explore and both parties have a chance to enjoy each other's company.

[NotchJohnson 214071]

Many times I see the difference between 30 minutes and 1 hr is like $20-$40, this by itself tells me that the lady prefers to be with the gentleman for the hour instead of the 30 minutes.

 

Just saying....

[boomer01 5544]

Not to be argumentative but if it was just 20 to 40 bucks in the difference then yes it would be a no brainer . I think that cost difference is pretty rare. I find it to be more like an 80 to 100 dollar difference.

Again that's been my experience. I guess I need to know who these 2 to 40 gals are .

[Liv Waters 52360]

I don't want too say much, because this stuff is really subjective and different session durations make sense to different people for different reasons, both on the client's and the companion's end.

 

For me, 30 minute encounters would leave me anxious...not leaving enough time to establish a comfort level before diving in...to talk and flirt and set a nice pace. Also, I specialize in a more holistic, and, shall we say, reciprocal pleasure oriented experience, which is extremely hard to achieve in 30 minutes.

[boomer01 5544]

I've come to the conclusion like most things it really is a personal choice.

Thanks for everyones input.

[nsguy73 180]

30 minutes is certainly a bit more fast paced than an hour...but considering most SP's seem to want to get you in, do the deed, and get you out so they can quickly move on to their next client...I question the amount of quality time that extra 30 mins would actually give a person.

 

Meeting an SP who can't seem to separate their hand from their phone for texting during any kind of meet, has got to be one of the most annoying things ever.

[Midnite-Energies 110563]

If that's your experience then perhaps you are meeting the wrong providers. I know many who limit the number of clients, don't book back to back and allow time so they are not rushed. Who enjoy the time spent learning about someone and making the connection.

 

If you are finding those who cannot remove their cell from the encounter, it may be time to adjust who and what you're looking for and do more research. It's sad that you question quality time.

[redmana2 2754]

For the first time yesterday I actually had an SP refuse to give me an hour appointment. She said she caps new clients at 30 minutes for the first date. I was willing to give her twice the donation for back to back 30 minute dates but she declined the extra money. I've never done a 30 minute appointment before. I generally want M**G, and squeezing that into such a small window sounds thoroughly unenjoyable. I politely declined the half hour.

[Triple HHH 12345]

From my experience in the short time I have being here I enjoy having my first visit a hour and a half. This had given both parties time to chat, get a

good vibe going towards a fun time for both:)

[minuteman06 518]

This may be digging up an old thread but here goes: I recently had my first experience with an SP and as a newbie I choose to book more than 1 hour. For me I had an idea of what I thought I would like to do and then do again! I knew I would be nervous for the first time and I was but the extra time definitely helped to slow things down and enjoy the whole reason why I was there to begin with!

[gogofmagog 655]

Never ... ever commit to 1 hr on a first session!

 

What if she is a hobbit with the personality of a house fly?

 

I am not there to get in touch with my feelings and chat. I am there for one reason ... and one reason only. And that only takes 30 mins.

 

Chemistry is established by our pheromones not any witty conversation. Some of the best sex of my life have been with escorts I have hardly talked to and just got right into it with.