Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/24/11 in all areas
-
2 pointsSafety?? LOL! If only it were that simple, that all we had to do is shave down there and we would be disease free. This is dangerous misinformation to spread. Shaving has nothing to do with disease or hygiene. You can catch an STD or STI regardlesss of your pubic hair situation. With regard to hygiene, just shower and wash with a mild soap once a day and you'll be fine. There is nothing unhygienic about having hair.
-
2 pointsI am trimmed (no landing strip), not shaved and I practice good hygiene and I am free of disease. A clean, well shaven area does not guarantee the person is disease-free. I am not sure how you drew that conclusion.
-
2 pointsI love being hairless and my pussy is definitely 100% woman. I have no desire to look like a preteen girl, I just don't like hair between my legs. There is no reason to make a link to prepubescence. Do you think that men who shave their faces look like little boys? Hardly!
-
1 pointBig problem in Winnipeg from what I have been told... and from the responses I get I understand why. You make a date through a "booking agency" or with a "receptionist" and the provider who shows up is not the one described to you... or worse you seen their photo online or in a magazine and it's 100% not the same person. Either way your immediate reaction is "I have been scammed". So what do you do? Do you suck it up and pay the provider then bad mouth the agency online the next day? Do you actually pay the "agreed on" price and go through with the date? Do you send them off and say "sorry, but I think a mistake has been made" and try again with a different booking agency or independent? Well if you did not send the provider away then you just gave the agency more reason to continue to bait and switch customers and you just gave the prodivder a reason to continue to work for the corrupt agency. Congratulations you just made the problem even worse! We know Winnipeg has at least 3 agencies who bait and switch customers, they use different phone numbers, emails, names, etc so we can not police this for you! You know the bait and switch agencies and scammers read this site right!!? Your fooling yourself if you think they don't. Of course they do! They may not contribute but you know they are reading the posts. Hell, they may be contributing as well. You can usually point them out, they are the ones bad mouthing the independents that you had a good time with and for some reason you feel no obligation to step in and let people you had a good time with that person - of course if they feel no way about bait and switch then you know they have no problem with a few fake bad reviews to slow down the competition - usually we spot them and delete them right away but we need your help! If you have a good time with someone LET OTHERS KNOW!!! You want to know how you can stop this? Forget bad mouthing the providers who work for these agencies, you all seem to know who they are so start letting others know of "THE GOOD" agencies or independents! Every time you post about the GOOD ones you loose business for the BAD ones as people will read these posts. We have 4000+ visitors a day log into Lyla and read the posts!! Sure, only a dozen new threads appear in Winnipeg each month right now but this will change if you post good content (Recommendations of good experiences) Just look at the views on some of the threads in Winnipeg, some have been viewed 1500 times! People are reading the site so let them know who they can visit and get a good service (honest service) from. The purpose of this site is not to bash the escorts! ... and it's definitely not to spread rumours! It's the responsibilities of the guys and the escorts to clean up the problems in Winnipeg! Let's get the Winnipeg part of this site rocking!! We have the visitors reading the posts lets see some good strong recommendations here!! Let's let all the new people and current members know who offers the best services in the city!!
-
1 point
-
1 pointThe following article clearly states that (Ottawa) police is not really interested in cracking down on incalls and almost solely concentrates on street level prostitution where drugs or public complain is involved. Here is a related part: And here is the full article http://www.ottawasun.com/2011/06/04/mean-streets-for-hookers In another article that I also find, sex workers were encouraged to contact the police in case somebody is hurting them (so please do so if you need help without fearing arrest based on this article) and here is full article http://www.ottawasun.com/2011/06/05/cash-rolls-in-for-sex
-
1 pointAn "incall" is anywhere a companion, massage provider or other sex worker receives clients. And if she sees clients there habitually--which can be as few as two times--the place becomes a "common bawdy house." Those of us who work out of our homes or out of apartments we use for business purposes are operating bawdy houses even if we're the only one working there or we share the place with another worker who may or may not live there full-time. If a provider rents a hotel room and sees clients there, the first one she sees is considered to be a private visit. It is only when she sees more than one person in that room, for business purposes, that the place becomes a bawdy house and the hotel must evict her if there's a problem. If the hotel knowingly tolerates a prostitute operating on their premises, they are guilty of living on the avails of prostitution. Innkeepers and prostitutes have been in cahoots from the dawn of time. The mutually lucrative arrangement is most likely to break if other hotel guests are inconvenienced. Noise, traffic and late hours are the problems most likely to alert other guests and the hotel management.
-
1 pointIt's their turn...couldn't do worse than men have...and frankly we're exhausted. Capable, smart, kind and tough as nails. I'm in!! Some might argue they already are :) Peace MG
-
1 pointWhat is the point in raising anxiety about the theoretical possibilities of being arrested for seeing an independent paid companion? I really don't understand this at all. We do not live in a repressive, totalitarian dictatorship. Big Brother is not watching your every move. As long as you're engaging in activities with competent adults (that is, adults who are capable of giving consent freely), in private, without disturbing the neighbours, you have nothing to worry about. Paid companions are not enemies. The overwhelming majority of us are not here to upset anyone's life; out them to their spouses, families or employers; or to rob, coerce or blackmail them. We are businesswomen making a living. Setting up clients to get caught by law enforcement agents is simply bad for business. No matter how important you are, or imagine that you are, with few exceptions, the police are not very interested in how you're spending your time. Really, they're not. If you're a major politician who needs to have the RCMP around you most of the time, you probably won't spend a lot of time with paid companions on a regular basis, not because of the legalities, but because your privacy is significantly limited by your role in public life. Otherwise, unless you're part of an international drug cartel, a suspected terrorist or someone whose activities are likely to put the public at risk, the police are not camped outside your residence, watching you. They haven't bugged your car, your landline or your cell phone. Everyone wants to feel important, but the fact is that most people are only important to those with whom they have direct, personal contact. So relax. Get over yourself. Don't let your ego run away with you. Independent paid companions are very rarely raided. Why? Because the police tell us that they're not interested in what we're doing as long as no one complains about it! Keeping a low profile while being careful about whom we entertain, how many we see and how late at night makes all the difference. You are more likely to be arrested for being found in a common bawdy house if you're visiting a massage parlor staffed by women who speak little English. When the authorities receive enough complaints about those places, they may raid them, particularly if they consider the management to be involved in human trafficking or if they appear to be employing underage women. Established, reputable massage parlors are very, very rarely raided. This is not because everything that goes on in them is legal, but because for various reasons the police elect to ignore what happens as long as the neighbours don't complain too much. Seeing an independent massage provider is no riskier than seeing an independent paid companion. Instead of finding things to be upset about--and ways to distress others--why not focus energy on finding ways to ensure that your encounters with companions are as unique, satisfying and rewarding for both parties as possible? The karma police will be happier!
-
1 pointThe important thing is that my retinas are now seared with that image.
-
1 pointThis is a a tough topic. Like Capialman mentions though, boundaries. This is a word that goes out to the water for a few. I have regular clients I really like, a few I'm fond of. However, when too many boundaries are crossed I do encourage that person to move on. I'm pretty open about who I am and don't mind personable, within our personal boundaries as we are all different. There's so many great Ladies and Gents on board here. What we provide and share should be explored and not held too dearly. If it's no longer fun and if it becomes too emotional, it's no longer sexy.
-
1 pointI prefer shaved, or a well trimmed landing strip. That is mostly because I like to do DATY. I would never do DATY on a woman who is not shaven down there. It is a safety issue for me. A clean well shaven area shows good hygiene and that the person is free from any disease.
-
1 pointHa. And since when has the strict letter of the law mattered? LE are quite capable of sending letters, arresting people, and then mysteriously failing to ever actually press charges. If you want an example in a completely different context, using your cellphone to take pics or video of police doing things - in a public place, where there's no expectation of privacy - that they may not like made public is a good way to get your phone (or camera) confiscated. This is completely illegal on their part, and if you press the issue you'd probably get your phone and/or camera back... although you'd be likely to find that any material relating to LE doing anything they shouldn't had been mysteriously erased. Back to the matter at hand... yes it's entirely possible that sufficiently over-zealous LE might send 'Dear John' letters to people they suspected but couldn't actually prosecute. After all, where's the harm in callously screwing up someone's relationship with their SO? If they're suspected of having been in a suspected bawdy-house they clearly deserve it, right? Apologies for the rant, but the point is that the finer points of the law won't stop LE making your life miserable if they choose to do so. Having said that, I'm inclined to agree with Megan: unless you're unfortunate enough to be on the premises when somewhere is busted, nothing is likely to happen; LE just aren't that bothered unless something seriously criminal (drugs, minors, people-trafficking) is going on. If you're seeing another consenting adult (or two :) ) then the risk is so small as to be minimal. If you're that paranoid, you'll probably never make it to anyone's incall because it's far too dangerous crossing the road on the way there :)
-
1 pointI personally find it sort of unnerving that guys love the prepubescent look. I feel like, I've waited for years to grow into my fur and I really like it! When I see myself down there with it I LOVE it! Makes me feel really sexy and verry womanly! Almost every fella I see comments on how I have such a cute little bush, a really nice compliment.
-
1 pointWell I for one enjoy Egg nog so the sooner it comes out the better wish it was out year round Posted via Mobile Device
-
1 point
-
1 pointThe strong liking (also interpreted as love by many) that happens so often between men and women who get to know one another fairly well can happen regardless of how you meet one another and the fact that it is inconvenient for one or both won't usually matter much to either if it's mutual. The very nature of this particular business means it's more likely than not that it will be an unwelcome situation for one or the other or both people. If it's mutual and both people are emotionally available and mature enough to cope with the inevitable unique problems they'll encounter, more power to them to explore it if they want to. If not, I think most would agree with you birdboy that they should savor the great memories and move on.
-
1 point
-
1 pointI miss Jewel247 from Kingston, ON. I only have superlatives about her, no adjectives can describe being with her. She was an absolute sweet heart, with a great body, and boy, could she deliver in the bed. She would always leave me breathless and weak in my legs. Worst part was that I would dream about her for days after. She stopped posting in February this year. Hope everything is well with her.
-
1 pointI don't really like these types of statements, they mostly feel like sexism phrased as enlightenment. I don't think we should pick our leaders based on their genitals. Is that really how you guys think? Do you see that USA's economy sucks and say "Oh, the crappy economy must be because of Obama's weak sensitive balls, they should elect Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann to be President because their strong vaginas will provide superior knowledge of economics."? Really? I think we should look for the best leaders regardless of their sex, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. I'm also not big on considering somebody an admirable leader just because he/she seized a lot of power and made a lot of things happen. That would mean giving respect to every two-bit dictator on the planet and that's just not my style. I value the quality of the things a leader does, not the scope or the quantity.
-
1 pointHoly Cow! I'm almost speechless! Roxxxi is a dash of hot sauce on your bland cornflakes or favourite salsa. I swear you can feel the heat bubbling from her at 20 paces. What a knockout. A fresh, young lady in her early 20s, kind of face and sweet of disposition. She will charm the socks (and nearly everything else) offa' you. If you see her, you may notice she has a few tasteful tats. Ask her about 'em and I think she'll proudly show them off. Better yet, you should explore them up close and personal for yourself :icon_biggrin: She has some girl meat on her bones and carries it extremely well...oh lordy does she carry it well. The girl has some serious skills. Fun conversation, even funner massage. Well spoken, educated and smiles are free. What a sweetie...an absolute gem - go see her! A home run for AT. P.S - Can you tell I'm enthused?
-
1 pointPardon me for being so blunt, but any agency that holds back money and charges fines isn't an agency... it`s a pimp. An agency works for the provider not the other way around. Much like an agent for an actor, musician or author; they are responsible for getting their client`s name out there and booking them work. If the lady doesnt want to work she doesn't have to. If the agent is unsuccessful in providing work then the provider should fire the agent. Good for you for going indy!
-
1 point
-
1 pointLana is a fine easy going young lady who gave me the best massage i ever had. Time with Lana is time well spent and i look forward to seeing her again the next time she is in town.
-
Newsletter